PO.TB02.02 · 肿瘤生物学
几何形态与朝向对microCT新型高通量骨成像盒系统中射束硬化的影响
Geometry and orientation influences beam hardening in a new high-throughput bone imaging cassette system for microCT
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
原发性和转移性骨癌可显著改变骨结构和成分。使用高分辨率microCT对骨形态和骨矿物质密度变化进行可视化和定量,是疾病进展和治疗疗效的关键诊断指标。测量小鼠骨内部结构微小变化所需的扫描质量,要求较小的视野和跨大量样本的更长成像时间。此外,骨还需单独扫描,以确保数据质量不因射束硬化而受损——射束硬化是一种众所周知的microCT伪影,可降低校准密度测量的准确性。在本研究中,我们发现视野内多个骨的几何形态及相应朝向对确保皮质骨的准确定量至关重要。通过结合Quantum GX3 microCT(Revvity, Inc.)的快速扫描速率和高容量(18个)骨夹持器,我们报告了一种高分辨率/高通量(6 μm,40 s/骨)microCT成像方法,同时不因射束硬化而牺牲皮质骨定量的统计学显著性。为确认最佳配置,将从年龄匹配、皮质骨平均HU值相近的小鼠采集的健康骨,使用低密度塑料支架,以不同方式(2/3/6个骨)排列在定制的3D打印骨夹持器中。作为参照,将相同的骨单独扫描,以比较射束硬化衰减对皮质骨(定义为>3000 HU)的影响。使用每根骨皮质组织的平均HU值来评估一个(对照)、两个、三个和六个骨的几何形态影响。每种配置均在相同视野(18 mm)、时间(4分钟)和分辨率(6 μm)下,于软(70 kV,160 μA,1.0 mm Al滤片)和硬(85 kV,140 μA,0.5/0.06 mm Al/Cu)X射线条件下扫描。使用计算得到的HU值(Analyze 15)以及载物台和孔径尺寸,设计并3D打印了三个互锁盒,每个可容纳六根骨,每幅图像共18根。在硬X射线和软X射线图像中均观察到平均HU值的可测量差异,证实射束硬化的影响直接受夹持器内骨几何形态的影响;然而,与对照相比,在硬X射线和软X射线条件下,任一骨的最大差异分别仅为4%或5%。我们的结果显示了在Quantum GX3 microCT上对高分辨率骨扫描进行高通量、准确定量的潜力。未来工作将聚焦于优化盒的设计以改善样本装载、评估节省的时间、提高样本类型的灵活性,以及与AI赋能的分割工具实现无缝软件集成。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Primary and metastatically derived bone cancers can significantly change bone structure and composition. Visualization and quantification of changes in bone morphology and bone mineral density using high-resolution microCT is a key diagnostic measurement of disease progression and treatment efficacy. The scan quality needed to measure small changes within internal bone structures of mice requires a smaller field of view and longer imaging times across high quantities of samples. Bones are also individually scanned to ensure data quality is not corrupted by beam hardening, a well-known microCT artifact that can reduce the accuracy of calibrated density measurements. In this study, we found that the geometry and corresponding orientation of multiple bones within the field of view are crucial to ensure accurate quantification of cortical bone. By combining the fast-scan rates of the Quantum GX3 microCT (Revvity, Inc.) and a high-capacity (18) bone holder, we report a high-resolution/high-throughput (6 µm, 40 s/bone) microCT imaging methodology, without sacrificing statistical significance in quantification of cortical bone due to beam hardening. To confirm the optimal configuration, healthy bones harvested from age-matched mice with similar mean HU values for cortical bone were arranged in different patterns (2/3/6 bones) in a customized, 3D printed bone holder using low a density plastic scaffold. As a reference, the same bones were scanned individually to compare the effect of beam hardening attenuation in cortical bone (defined as >3000 HU). The mean HU values for each bone's cortical tissue were used to assess the effect of the geometry of one (control), two, three and six bones. Each configuration was scanned in the same field of view (18 mm), time (4 mins) and resolution (6 µm) at soft (70kV, 160 µA,1.0 mm Al filter) and hard (85 kV, 140 µA, 0.5/0.06 mm Al/Cu) x-ray conditions. Calculated HU values (Analyze 15) and the dimensions of the stage and bore were used to design and 3D-print three interlocking cassettes, each with a capacity of six bones for a total of 18 per image. In both hard and soft x-ray images measurable differences in mean HU values were observed, confirming the influence of beam hardening is directly influenced by the geometry of the bones in the holder; however, when compared to the control, a maximum of 4% or 5% difference was observed for any bone in hard and soft x-ray conditions, respectively. Our results show potential for high-throughput and accurate quantification of high-resolution bone scans in the Quantum GX3 microCT. Future work will focus on refining the cassette's design to improve sample loading, evaluating time savings, increasing flexibility in sample type, and providing seamless software integration with AI-enabled segmentation tools.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Tseng,
Revvity Employment.
M. Harlacher,
Revvity Employment.
A. Allphin,
Revvity Employment.
J. D. Peterson,
Revvity Employment.
J. Hostens,
Revvity Employment.
T. J. Czernuszewicz,
Revvity Employment.
W. Harrop,
Revvity Employment.
Z. H. Houston,
Revvity Employment.