PO.BCS01.09 · 生物信息与计算
一款用于系统识别潜在不良药物-药物相互作用的循证工具
An evidence-based tool to systematically identify potential adverse drug-drug interactions
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:联合治疗在肿瘤学中很常规,但可能与不良药物-药物相互作用(DDI)相关。基于机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)的工具已应用于该问题,然而它们往往缺乏预测依据。我们利用已发表数据(包括FDA药物标签信息),创建了一款基于规则的工具,旨在基于共享的基因机制、机理影响和支持性临床证据来识别和分类潜在的药物-药物相互作用候选。
设计:从338种已批准药物(271种小分子和67种生物制剂)的FDA药物标签中开发和整理了一个专有数据库,捕获药物-基因和药物-药物相互作用的详细信息。随后基于共享基因机制、机理影响和支持性临床证据开发了一款基于规则的药物-药物相互作用(DDI)评估工具。该工具的性能在2个独立数据集中进行评估。
结果:该工具首先使用一组经整理的已知DDI阳性和DDI阴性药物对进行测试(20个DDI阳性,10个DDI阴性),达到100%的准确率。随后评估了基于机理模型(Cellworks)预测具有疗效的544个药物对,其中6.8%的药物对(37/544)被预测为DDI阳性。其中,34对共享一个共同基因并显示出明确的受害者-加害者关系,表明存在可能相互作用的强机理关联,而另外3个DDI阳性药物对(氟尿嘧啶、奥沙利铂;卡铂、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇;曲妥珠单抗、紫杉醇)在缺乏共享基因的情况下显示出相互作用的临床证据。对ClinicalTrials.gov的评估显示,其中7对(18.9%)因毒性相关发现而在临床开发中失败。460对(93%)DDI阴性药物对缺乏共享基因通路、机理关系和临床佐证。
结论:该工具专为肿瘤学应用而开发,将FDA标签数据和与癌症治疗相关的临床信息与机理见解相结合,提供了一种预测和减轻药物联合所引发毒性风险的方法。未来研究将旨在前瞻性验证该工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Combination therapy is routine in oncology, although it may be associated with adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Machine-learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) based tools have been applied to this problem, however they often lack predictive rationales. We have leveraged published data, including FDA drug label information, to create a rule-based tool designed to identify and classify potential drug-drug interaction candidates based on shared gene mechanisms, mechanistic impact, and supporting clinical evidence.
Design: A proprietary database was developed and curated from the FDA drug labels of 338 approved drugs (271 small molecules and 67 biologics), capturing detailed information on drug-gene and drug-drug interactions. A rule-based Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI) assessment tool was then developed based on shared gene mechanisms, mechanistic impact, and supported clinical evidence. The performance of the tool was evaluated in 2 independent data sets.
Results: The tool was first tested using a curated set of known DDI-positive and DDI-negative drug pairs, (20 DDI-positive, 10 DDI-negative) yielding 100 percent accuracy. A second set of 544 drug pairs predicted to have efficacy based on a mechanistic model (Cellworks) was then assessed, with 6.8% pairs (37/544) predicted to be DDI-positive. Of these, 34 pairs shared a common gene and showed a clear victim-perpetrator relationship, indicating a strong mechanistic link for possible interactions, while the 3 additional DDI-positive pairs (Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin; Carboplatin, Nab-Paclitaxel; Trastuzumab, Paclitaxel) showed clinical evidence of interaction in the absence of shared genes. Evaluation of ClinicalTrials.gov showed that 7 of these pairs (18.9%) had failed clinical development due toxicity-related findings. 460 (93%) of the DDI-negative drug pairs lacked shared gene pathways, mechanistic relationships, and clinical corroboration.
Conclusions: Developed specifically for oncology applications, the tool couples FDA label data and clinical information relevant to cancer treatment with mechanistic insights, providing a method to predict and mitigate toxicity risks arising from drug combinations. Future studies will aim to prospectively validate the tool.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Sinha,
Cellworks Employment.
A. Kumar,
Cellworks Employment.
R. K,
Cellworks Employment.
V. Nair,
Cellworks Employment.
L. Behura,
Cellworks Employment.
D. Lala,
Cellworks Employment.
J. Wingrove,
Cellworks Employment, Stock Option.