PO.CL01.03 · 临床研究
基于单细胞空间转录组学的胃癌来源三级淋巴结构评分及其在泛癌种中对免疫治疗响应的验证
Gastric cancer-derived tertiary lymphoid structure score from single-cell spatial transcriptomics with pan-cancer validation for immunotherapy response
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:胃癌(GC)是癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一,晚期患者5年生存率较差,突显了对指导免疫治疗的生物标志物的需求。肿瘤微环境中的三级淋巴结构(TLSs)已被证明与良好预后和免疫检查点阻断响应相关,但胃癌来源的TLS转录特征的特异性及其在不同肿瘤类型中的适用性仍不清楚。我们使用单细胞分辨率的空间转录组学构建了一个胃癌来源的TLS评分,并在GC和泛癌种队列中评估了其预后和免疫治疗预测价值。
方法:在100例GC患者的队列中,通过H&E、免疫组化和多重免疫组化在手术标本上评估TLS的存在和成熟度。20例新鲜GC肿瘤的子集接受了高分辨率CosMx单细胞空间转录组学,以绘制TLS阳性与TLS阴性区域中免疫和基质细胞的分布。这些空间数据用于鉴定TLS区域、定义主要细胞群,并推导出一个78基因TLS特征,据此构建了胃癌来源的TLS评分。将该评分应用于泛癌种bulk转录组数据集和抗PD-1黑色素瘤队列,以评估其预后和免疫治疗预测性能。在huCD34⁺ HSC-NCG小鼠中建立患者来源异种移植(PDOX)GC肿瘤,并用抗PD-1/CTLA-4抗体处理,以检验与TLS评分的功能关联。
结果:患者被分层为TLS阴性、未成熟TLS和成熟TLS组。CosMx空间转录组学解析出10个主要细胞群,并绘制了它们在TLS区域与非TLS区域的分布。从成熟TLS区域,我们推导出一个78基因特征并构建了胃癌来源的TLS评分。在多种肿瘤类型中,包括低级别胶质瘤、黑色素瘤、NSCLC、转移性黑色素瘤和转移性GC,较高的评分与改善的生存和更好的免疫检查点阻断响应相关(AUC最高达0.857);在黑色素瘤免疫治疗队列中,高评分患者始终具有更优的总生存。在人源化GC PDOX模型中,高TLS评分肿瘤对抗PD-1/CTLA-4显示出增强的响应,伴有肿瘤细胞凋亡增加以及更高的T细胞和B细胞浸润,可能增强了抗肿瘤免疫。
结论:我们利用单细胞分辨率的空间转录组数据开发了首个胃癌来源的TLS评分,并在多种肿瘤类型和一个人源化GC模型中验证了其性能。这一高分辨率评分始终与免疫检查点阻断后改善的响应和生存相关,支持将其用作跨癌种的患者分层和免疫治疗指导的精确生物标志物。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, with poor 5-year survival rates for advanced stages, emphasizing the need for biomarkers to guide immunotherapy. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in the tumor microenvironment have been linked to favorable prognosis and immune checkpoint blockade response, but the specificity of GC-derived TLS transcriptional signatures and their utility across tumor types remain unclear. We used single-cell-resolution spatial transcriptomics to construct a GC-derived TLS score and evaluated its prognostic and immunotherapy-predictive value in GC and pan-cancer cohorts.
Methods: In a cohort of 100 GC patients, TLS presence and maturation were assessed on surgical specimens by H&E, immunohistochemistry, and multiplex immunohistochemistry. A subset of 20 fresh GC tumors underwent high-resolution CosMx single-cell spatial transcriptomics to map immune and stromal cell distribution in TLS-positive versus TLS-negative regions. These spatial data were used to identify TLS regions, define major cell populations, and derive a 78-gene TLS signature, from which we constructed the GC-derived TLS score. The score was applied to pan-cancer bulk transcriptomic datasets and anti-PD-1 melanoma cohorts to assess its prognostic and immunotherapy-predictive performance. Patient-derived xenograft (PDOX) GC tumors were established in huCD34⁺ HSC-NCG mice and treated with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 antibodies to test functional associations with TLS score.
Results: Patients were stratified into TLS-negative, immature TLS, and mature TLS groups. CosMx spatial transcriptomics resolved 10 major cell populations and mapped their distribution in TLS versus non-TLS regions. From mature TLS regions, we derived a 78-gene signature and constructed a GC-derived TLS score. Higher scores were associated with improved survival and better response to immune checkpoint blockade across multiple tumor types, including low-grade glioma, melanoma, NSCLC, metastatic melanoma, and metastatic GC (AUCs up to 0.857); in melanoma immunotherapy cohorts, high-score patients consistently had superior overall survival. In the humanized GC PDOX model, high TLS score tumors showed enhanced response to anti-PD-1/CTLA-4, with increased tumor cell apoptosis and higher T- and B-cell infiltration, potentially enhancing anti-tumor immunity.
Conclusions: We developed the first GC-derived TLS score using single-cell-resolution spatial transcriptomic data and validated its performance across multiple tumor types and in a humanized GC model. This high-resolution score was consistently associated with improved response and survival after immune checkpoint blockade, supporting its use as a precise biomarker for patient stratification and immunotherapy guidance across cancers.
利益披露 Disclosure
W. Zhu, None..
H. Shen, None..
H. Wang, None..
B. Liu, None..
X. Li, None..
K. Chen, None.