PO.CL01.03 · 临床研究
体细胞DDR突变作为转移性胰腺癌铂类获益的潜在预测性生物标志物
Somatic DDR mutations as potential predictive biomarkers of platinum benefit in metastatic pancreatic cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:二代测序(NGS)促进了胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中遗传改变的广泛鉴定。胚系DNA损伤修复(DDR)突变,包括BRCA1/2、PALB2和ATM,可预测对一线铂类化疗(CTX)的敏感性。然而,体细胞DDR突变的预测作用仍不明确。
方法:我们回顾性识别了2018年1月至2025年6月期间在Dan L Duncan综合癌症中心(休斯顿, TX)接受治疗、携带体细胞DDR突变(sDDR)的转移性PDAC(mPDAC)患者。排除胚系DDR突变或MSI-high肿瘤患者以及接受<2个周期CTX的患者。评估最佳应答(RECIST 1.1)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。OS定义为从CTX开始至死亡、临终关怀入组或末次随访之间的间隔。使用Fisher精确检验比较队列内接受一线铂类与非铂类CTX的sDDR患者的结局。使用单样本二项检验(ORR)和指数生存假设下的单样本χ²检验(PFS、OS)将接受一线铂类CTX的sDDR患者的结局与未经选择的PRODIGE对照进行比较。
结果:18例患者符合纳入标准;14例(77.8%)为初发mPDAC,4例(22.2%)为切除术后复发。sDDR突变包括ATM(11例,61.1%)、BRCA2(5例,27.8%)、BRCA1(1例,5.6%)和PALB2(1例,5.6%)。12例患者接受一线FOLFIRINOX(5-氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂):4例(33.3%)部分缓解,4例(33.3%)疾病稳定,4例(33.3%)疾病进展,客观缓解率(ORR)为33.3%,疾病控制率(DCR)为66.6%。其余6例患者接受非铂类CTX(n=6):5例(83.3%)疾病稳定,1例(16.7%)疾病进展,ORR为0%,DCR为83.3%。铂类组中位PFS为13个月,非铂类组为16个月(p=0.5),中位OS分别为27对31个月(p=0.6)。与PRODIGE中接受FOLFIRINOX的未经选择人群相比,我们队列中接受铂类CTX的sDDR患者ORR相当(33.3%对31.6%,p=1.0),但PFS更长(13对6.4个月,χ²=70.6,p<0.001),OS更长(27对11.1个月,χ²=87.5,p<0.001)。
结论:在这项探索性单中心队列中,与PRODIGE中接受FOLFIRINOX治疗的未经选择患者相比,接受FOLFIRINOX治疗的sDDR突变mPDAC患者PFS和OS更长。在我们的小型sDDR队列中,铂类与非铂类CTX的结局无统计学优势。这些产生假设的发现受限于样本量小、回顾性设计以及倾向于完成≥2个CTX周期患者的选择偏倚。需要更大规模的研究来阐明sDDR突变是否可预测mPDAC结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has faciliated widespread identification of genetic alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Germline DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations, including BRCA1/2, PALB2, and ATM, predict sensitivity to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX). However, the predictive role of somatic DDR mutations remains undefined.
Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) harboring a somatic DDR mutation (sDDR) who were treated at the Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center (Houston, TX) between January 2018 and June 2025. Patients with germline DDR mutations or MSI-high tumors and those who < 2 cycles of CTX were excluded. Best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. OS was defined as the interval between CTX initiation and death, hospice enrollment, or last follow-up. Outcomes for sDDR patients receiving first-line platinum vs non-platinum CTX within our cohort were compared using Fisher's exact test. Outcomes for sDDR patients receiving first-line platinum CTX were compared with unselected PRODIGE controls using a one-sample binomial test (ORR) and a one-sample χ² test under exponential survival assumptions (PFS, OS).
Results: Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria; 14 (77.8%) had de novo mPDAC and 4 (22.2%) had recurrences post-resection. sDDR mutations included ATM (11, 61.1%), BRCA2 (5, 27.8%), BRCA1 (1, 5.6%), and PALB2 (1, 5.6%). Twelve patients received first-line FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin): 4 (33.3%) had partial response, 4 (33.3%) had stable disease, and 4 (33.3%) had progressive disease, yielding an overall response rate (ORR) of 33.3% and disease control rate (DCR) of 66.6%. The remaining 6 patients received non-platinum CTX (n=6): 5 (83.3%) had stable disease and 1 (16.7%) had progressive disease, yielding an ORR of 0% and DCR of 83.3%. Median PFS was 13 months in the platinum group versus 16 months in the non-platinum group (p=0.5), and median OS was 27 vs 31 months (p=0.6). Compared to the unselected population who received FOLFIRINOX in PRODIGE, sDDR patients who received platinum CTX in our cohort demonstrated a comparable ORR (33.3% vs 31.6%, p=1.0), but longer PFS (13 vs 6.4 months, χ 2 =70.6, p < 0.001) and OS (27 vs 11.1 months, χ 2 =87.5, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this exploratory single-institution cohort, PFS and OS were longer in sDDR-mutated mPDAC patients treated with FOLFIRINOX compared to unselected patients treated with FOLFIRINOX in PRODIGE. Within our small sDDR cohort, outcomes were not statistically superior with platinum versus non-platinum CTX. These hypothesis-generating findings are limited by small sample size, retrospective design, and selection bias toward patients completing ≥2 CTX cycles. Larger studies are needed to clarify whether sDDR mutations predict mPDAC outcomes.
利益披露 Disclosure
E. L. Low, None..
A. Shah, None..
E. Jo, None..
A. Lackan, None..
S. Hilsenbeck, None.
B. L. Musher,
Revolution Medicines Independent Contractor.
Merus Independent Contractor.
Gnubiotics Sciences Independent Contractor.
AstraZeneca Other, Expert testimony.
BARD1 Life Sciences Expert testimony.
Lokon Pharma ).
Diakonos Research ).