PO.CL01.08 · 临床研究
转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中的血浆游离 DNA 核小体足迹
Plasma cell-free DNA nucleosome footprints in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:转录因子(TF)活性可通过血浆游离 DNA(cfDNA)低深度全基因组测序(lpWGS)中的核小体足迹来测定。缠绕在核小体周围的 cfDNA 受到保护而免于酶切降解,TF 在其结合位点周围诱导相位化的核小体定位,从而导致振荡性的测序覆盖度以及在开放染色质区域的优先耗竭。在此,我们量化了数百个 TF 结合位点处的核小体占据情况,评估了这些功能性读数在取自 CARD 前瞻性随机试验(卡巴他赛 [CAB] 对第二种雄激素受体通路抑制剂 [ARPI])受试者血浆中的临床效用。
方法:使用血浆 cfDNA lpWGS(中位覆盖度约 1.6x)来推断 682 个 TF 的 TF 结合位点(TFBS)处的核小体足迹。总体而言,217 名 CARD 试验受试者构成测试队列,174 名在 FIRSTANA 和 PROSELICA 前瞻性试验中接受紫杉烷治疗的患者构成验证集。104 名健康参与者的 cfDNA lpWGS 用作对照。使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算风险比(HR)。使用 Logistic 回归计算比值比(OR)。使用线性混合效应模型研究基线与后续时间点之间的纵向变化。所有分析均针对肿瘤分数进行了校正。
结果:在 682 个具有可用结合位点注释的 TF 中,357 个持续产生至少 2:1 的信噪比并被进一步分析。开展了利用技术重复(不同样本;同一时间点)和生物学重复(不同样本,在基线和筛选时相隔数周采集)的分析验证,确定了这些 TF 在每个 1000 TFBS 处的动态范围。为每个 TF 确定了测序覆盖度和肿瘤分数的检测限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)。在 357 个 TF 中,相对于健康对照,244 个与 mCRPC 显著相关(Wilcoxon 检验,校正 p 值 < 0.05),包括 AR、NKX3-1、E2F1、MYC、MYCN 和 MAZ。CARD 中的预测分析显示,基线时 UBP1 结合位点处的可及性与紫杉烷相对 ARSI 的敏感性相关(OR 1.44,95% 1.07-1.95,p 值 < 0.05)。此外,平均 FOXP1 可及性评分在进展时升高(平均升高 1.76,SE 0.49,p 值 0.02),同时 AR(平均升高 1.16,SE 0.49,p 值 0.02)和 GRHL2 评分(平均升高 1.33,SE 0.53,p 值 0.01)也升高。这些源自血浆的数据提示患者在进展时伴随 AR 信号传导增强。
结论:使用 lpWGS 评估 TFBS 处的核小体足迹是一种稳健的方法,可识别有价值的药物敏感性功能性生物标志物。此类研究提供了通过系列临床样本探究疾病进展的机会,而在其他情况下表型分析是不可行的。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Transcription factor (TF) activity can be determined by nucleosome footprints in low-pass whole genome sequencing (lpWGS) of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). cfDNA wrapped around nucleosomes is protected from enzymatic digestion, and TFs induce phased nucleosome positioning around their binding sites, which results in oscillatory sequencing coverage and preferential depletion at open chromatin regions. Herein, we quantify nucleosome occupancy at binding sites for hundreds of TFs, evaluating the clinical utility of these functional readouts in plasma taken from subjects treated on the CARD prospective randomized trial of cabazitaxel (CAB) vs second androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI).
Methods: Plasma cfDNA lpWGS (median coverage ~1.6x) was used to infer nucleosome footprints at TF binding sites (TFBS) of 682 TFs. Overall, 217 CARD trial subjects comprised a Test cohort and 174 patients receiving a taxane on the FIRSTANA and PROSELICA prospective trials comprised a validation set. cfDNA lpWGS of a cohort of 104 healthy participants was used as a control. Hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox proportional hazards models. Odds ratios (OR) were computed using logistic regression. Longitudinal changes between baseline and subsequent timepoints were investigated using linear mixed effect models. All analyses were adjusted for tumor fraction.
Results: Out of 682 TFs with available binding site annotations, 357 consistently yielded signal-to-noise ratios of at least 2:1 and were further analyzed. Analytical validation utilizing technical replicates (different samples; same time point) and biological replicates (different samples, taken at baseline and screening, weeks apart) was pursued, determining the dynamic range for these TFs at 1000 TFBS each. Assay limits of detection (LOD) and limits of quantification (LOQ) for sequencing coverage and tumor fraction were determined for each TF. Of 357 TFs, 244 were significantly mCRPC associated (Wilcoxon test, adjusted p-value < 0.05) relative to healthy controls, including AR, NKX3-1, E2F1, MYC, MYCN, and MAZ. Predictive analysis in CARD showed accessibility at UBP1 binding sites at baseline was associated with taxane sensitivity over ARSI (OR 1.44, 95% 1.07-1.95, p-value < 0.05). Furthermore, average FOXP1 accessibility scores increased at progression (average increase 1.76, SE 0.49, p-value 0.02), alongside AR (average increase 1.16, SE 0.49, p-value 0.02) and GRHL2 scores (average increase 1.33, SE 0.53, p-value 0.01). These plasma-derived data suggest patients progress with increased AR signaling.
Conclusions: Evaluating nucleosome footprints at TFBS using lpWGS is a robust approach that identifies valuable functional biomarkers of drug sensitivity. Such studies offer the opportunity to interrogate disease progression through serial clinical samples, where phenotype profiling is otherwise unfeasible.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Bogdan, None..
J. Rekowski, None..
G. Seed, None..
C. Bertan, None..
J. Goodall, None..
G. Fowler, None..
P. Flohr, None.
C. Geffriaud-Ricouard,
Sanofi Employment.
M. Chadjaa,
Sanofi Employment, Stock.
S. Mace,
Sanofi Employment.
I. Lazzeri, None..
E. Heitzer, None..
S. Carreira, None..
W. Yuan, None.