PO.CL01.08 · 临床研究

跨15种癌症类型和7种亚型的甲基化特征比较

Comparing methylation signatures across 15 cancer types and 7 subtypes

海报缩略图:跨15种癌症类型和7种亚型的甲基化特征比较
编号 2603 展板 22 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 46 主讲 Avery Mickalide, BS;PhD
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 2
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Harry Mickalide, Joel Rodriguez-Medina, Fernando L. Mendez, Murat Can Cobanoglu, Scott Dashner, Yuqian Jiang, Kevin Chan, Joshua N. Burton, Trupti Kawli, Johannes G. Reiter, Matthew Rabinowitz, Alexey Aleshin

Natera, Inc., Austin, TX

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
差异甲基化区域(DMR)是指在肿瘤基因组与非肿瘤基因组之间具有不同甲基化模式的区域,可作为癌症检测的准确生物标志物。本研究比较了15种癌症类型和7种癌症亚型中的DMR。在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了来自832例患有15种不同癌症类型患者的组织样本,包括胃肠道(GI)、泌尿生殖系统(GU)、妇科、乳腺、肺、黑色素瘤以及头颈部癌症,以测定基因组区域的甲基化水平。晚期腺瘤(AA)作为结直肠癌的重要前驱病变,也被纳入作为GI适应症之间的比较对象。基于与健康样本甲基化水平的比较,在每种癌症类型中鉴定了DMR集合。通过计算两两重叠度,比较了各癌症类型和亚型间的DMR特征。在全部15种癌症类型中,共享DMR的重叠度范围为13%(黑色素瘤对比胃癌)至61%(食管癌对比胃癌)。值得注意的是,我们发现GI适应症之间存在强烈的重叠,该组包括食管癌、胃癌、小肠癌、肝癌、胰腺癌和结直肠癌以及AA。与非GI癌症相比,GI适应症中DMR的两两重叠度平均高17%。此外,AA与结直肠癌之间共享的DMR占65%,这代表了本分析中任何两两比较中最高的共享DMR重叠度。在乳腺癌和肺癌样本中,我们比较了亚型,发现重叠度强烈但存在差异。例如,在乳腺癌的四种主要亚型中,我们发现亚型间的重叠度范围为53%–68%。在三种肺癌亚型中,重叠度范围为34%至44%。在本研究中,我们证明了尽管不同癌症类型的DMR特征之间存在一定重叠,但每种癌症的DMR特征最终是独特的,可用作癌症检测的生物标志物。对共享和独特DMR特征的深入研究可能为癌症发生的潜在生物学机制提供见解。例如,GI癌症之间DMR特征的高度重叠提示存在某些共享机制;同样,虽然预期同一癌症亚型间的DMR特征相似,但对每种亚型独特模式的研究可能有助于解释临床预后和治疗反应中观察到的差异。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the regions that have a different methylation pattern between tumor and non-tumor genomes, can serve as accurate biomarkers for cancer detection. Here we compare DMRs across 15 cancer types and 7 cancer subtypes. In this retrospective study, tissue samples from 832 patients with 15 different cancer types, including gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), gynecological, breast, lung, melanoma, and head & neck cancers, were analyzed to measure methylation levels across genomic regions. Advanced adenoma (AA), an important precursor to colorectal cancer, was also included as a comparator among GI indications. Sets of DMRs were identified in each cancer type based on comparison with methylation levels of healthy samples. DMR signatures were compared across cancer types and subtypes by calculating pairwise overlaps. Across all 15 cancer types, the overlap of shared DMRs ranged from 13% (melanoma vs gastric cancer) to 61% (esophageal cancer vs gastric cancer). Notably, we found strong overlap among GI indications, a group including esophageal, gastric, small intestine, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer, as well as AA. Compared to non-GI cancers, the pairwise overlap of DMRs in GI indications was, on average, 17% higher. Moreover, 65% of DMRs were shared between AA and colorectal cancer, which represented the highest overlap of shared DMRs in any pairwise comparison in this analysis. Among breast and lung cancer samples, we compared subtypes and found strong, but variable, overlap. For instance, among four major subtypes of breast cancer, we found overlaps ranging 53%-68% between subtypes. Among three lung cancer subtypes, overlaps ranged from 34% to 44%. In this study, we demonstrate that each cancer's DMR signature is ultimately unique and can be used as a biomarker for cancer detection even though there is some overlap between DMR signatures of different cancer types. A deeper study of the shared and unique DMR signatures may provide insights into underlying biological mechanisms of cancer development. For example, the high overlap of DMR signatures among GI cancers suggests some shared mechanisms; similarly, while DMR signatures are expected to be similar between subtypes of a cancer, investigation into the patterns unique to each subtype may help resolve observed differences in clinical prognosis and treatment response.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Mickalide, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. J. Rodriguez-Medina, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. F. L. Mendez, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. M. Cobanoglu, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. S. Dashner, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. Y. Jiang, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. K. Chan, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. J. N. Burton, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. T. Kawli, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. J. G. Reiter, Natera, Inc. Employment, Stock, Stock Option. M. Rabinowitz, Natera, Inc. Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option, ), Travel, Patent, Consulting/Advisory Role. MyOme Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option, ), Travel, Patent, Consulting/Advisory Role. Marble Therapeutics Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option, Consulting/Advisory Role. A. Aleshin, Natera, Inc. Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索