PO.CL01.19 · 临床研究
用于NF1相关周围神经鞘瘤分型的循环蛋白质组学特征
Circulating proteomic signatures for subtyping NF1 associated peripheral nerve sheath tumors
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
目的:由于临床症状不敏感、标准诊疗影像学特异性有限以及侵入性组织活检的阴性预测值有限,1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)相关周围神经鞘瘤恶性转化的早期检测与干预具有挑战性。新型的非侵入性、不依赖肿瘤部位的监测检测方法为早期诊断和干预提供了可能,尤其是在由组织病理学定义的、从良性丛状神经纤维瘤(PN)向恶变前非典型神经纤维瘤(AN)的关键转化阶段。我们假设血浆中的循环蛋白能够准确区分PN、AN与恶性周围神经鞘瘤(MPNST)的疾病谱。
方法:使用邻近延伸分析(PEA)平台针对1461种蛋白(Olink)对来自NIH就诊的79名患者的118份血浆样本(健康者n = 10,PN n = 29,AN n = 25,MPNST n = 54)进行分析。采用一对多比较方法鉴定独特的蛋白特征:PN对全体(PvA),对PEA输出的归一化蛋白表达(NPX)数据进行方差分析(ANOVA)及事后Tukey诚实显著差异(HSD)检验。显著蛋白需满足NPX差异≥1.2且p adj<0.05。使用约登指数(Youden's index)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估单个蛋白的性能。鉴于PN在NF1中的高患病率及所鉴定蛋白的高特异性,出于临床实用性考虑,PN特异性预测特征被优先用于下游分析。使用支持向量机学习模型(SVM)并采用留一法交叉验证对单个PN相关蛋白特征进行整合(NPX差异≥1.2且p adj<0.05)。
结果:114种蛋白在PvA比较中具有显著性。PvA中单个蛋白的性能中位AUC为0.64(IQR:0.62-0.67),中位敏感性为0.38(IQR:0.33-0.47),中位特异性为0.97(IQR:0.86-1.0)。SVM显著提高了PN特征的性能(AUC:0.954)、敏感性(0.69,20/29 PN)和特异性(0.99,一例AN被误分类为PN)。整合后的PN蛋白特征能够高置信度地预测患者的肿瘤负荷是仍为PN,还是已转化为AN或MPNST(PPV:0.95,NPV:0.91)。
结论:本试点研究表明,循环蛋白质组学可非侵入性地区分NF1中的PN与恶变前及恶性疾病状态。PN蛋白谱显示蛋白表达、蛋白-蛋白相互作用及生物学通路存在显著失调。最后,PEA每份样本仅需40 μL血浆,从而能够从单管血液中整合非侵入性正交生物标志物,如无细胞DNA。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Purpose : Early detection and interception of malignant transformation in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) associated peripheral nerve sheath tumors are challenging due to insensitive clinical symptoms, limited specificity of standard of care imaging, and the limited negative predictive value of invasive tissue biopsy. Novel non-invasive and tumor site-agnostic surveillance assays provide potential for early diagnosis and intervention, especially during the critical transformation from benign plexiform neurofibromas (PN) to pre-malignant atypical neurofibromas (AN), defined by histopathology. We hypothesize that circulating proteins in the plasma accurately distinguish the spectrum of PN, AN, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).
Methods : 118 plasma samples (Healthy n = 10, PN n = 29, AN n = 25, and MPNST n = 54) from 79 patients seen at the NIH were analyzed using a proximity extension assay (PEA) panel for 1461 proteins ( Olink ). Unique protein signatures were identified using a one-versus-all comparison: PN-versus-all (PvA) with ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) of normalized protein expression (NPX) outputs from PEA. Significant proteins had an NPX difference ≥ 1.2 and p adj <0.05. Individual proteins' performances were assessed using Youden's index and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Given PN's high prevalence in NF1 and the high specificity of the identified proteins, a PN-specific predictive signature was prioritized for downstream analysis due to its clinical utility. Individual PN-associated protein signatures were integrated using a Support Vector Machine Learning Model (SVM) with leave-one-out cross-validation (NPX difference ≥ 1.2 and p adj <0.05).
Results: 114 proteins were significant for PvA comparisons. Individual protein's performance for PvA had a median AUC of 0.64 (IQR: 0.62-0.67), median sensitivity of 0.38 (IQR: 0.33-0.47), and median specificity of 0.97 (IQR: 0.86-1.0). SVM significantly improved the PN-signature's (AUC: 0.954),sensitivity (0.69, 20/29 PN), and specificity (0.99, one AN was misclassified as PN). The integrated PN protein signature predicts with high confidence whether a patient's tumor burden remains PN or has transformed to AN or MPNST (PPV: 0.95, NPV: 0.91).
Conclusions : This pilot demonstrates that circulating proteomics non-invasively distinguish PN from pre-malignant and malignant disease states in NF1. The PN protein profile shows significant dysregulation of protein expression, protein-protein interactions, and biological pathways. Finally, PEA uses just 40 μL of plasma per sample, enabling the integration of non-invasive orthogonal biomarkers, such as cell-free DNA, from a single tube of blood.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. M. Sachs, None..
A. M. Gross, None..
B. C. Widemann, None..
J. F. Shern, None..
R. T. Sundby, None.