PO.CL12.04 · 临床研究

胸部CT衍生的肌肉指数在肺癌患者中改善了对呼吸功能的预测,优于标准的L3肌少症测量

Thoracic ct-derived muscle indices improve prediction of respiratory function beyond standard L3 sarcopenia measures in lung cancer patients

海报缩略图:胸部CT衍生的肌肉指数在肺癌患者中改善了对呼吸功能的预测,优于标准的L3肌少症测量
编号 2618 展板 9 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 47 主讲 Kayleigh Erickson, MS
分会场 Molecular Imaging, Radiomics, and Theranostics
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Kayleigh R. Erickson, Juan Adrover Claudio, Chi-Chen Hong, Ken Batai, Nicolas F. Schlecht, Sai Yendamuri, Andrew Ray

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景。L3骨骼肌指数(SMI)是评估全身肌少症的CT标准,但它不评估胸部肌肉组织,可能遗漏与呼吸力学和上身功能相关的肌肉形态。本研究评估了胸部肌肉测量是否能在L3 SMI之外,为肺癌患者的功能和肺部表现提供独立或补充信息。 方法。分析了90名新诊断为肺癌、完成了临床指征CT成像和基线治疗前功能评估的成人。在L3和胸部水平(T4、T6、T8、T10)量化SMI。功能结局包括握力(HGS)、步速、坐立试验和6分钟步行距离(6MWT)。肺部结局包括最大吸气压和呼气压(MIP、MEP)、用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼气峰流速(PEF)。结局以连续变量检查,并按临床相关阈值进行二分类:握力低下(男性<28 kg;女性<18 kg)、6MWT受损(<300 m)和呼吸肌无力(男性/女性MIP≤62/83 cmH2O,MEP≤81/≤109 cmH2O)。采用相关分析、多变量线性回归(校正年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟和肿瘤分期)以及logistic回归评估关联;使用ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评估胸部SMI相对于L3的增量预测价值。 结果。胸部SMI与HGS、MIP、MEP和PEF显示中到强相关(r = 0.24-0.63,所有p<0.01)。在校正模型中,胸部SMI仍与HGS(beta = 0.20-0.37,p≤0.007)和若干呼吸测量相关,包括T4/T10的MEP以及T6/T8的FVC和PEF。L3 SMI与MEP、MIP或PEF无独立关联(p>0.10),但与全身活动能力关系更强(TUG和步速,两者p<0.02)。为将功能关联与临床相关性联系起来,针对临床定义的无力或损伤检查了预测性能。对于吸气肌无力,L3 SMI无预测价值(p=0.30;AUC=0.903),加入胸部SMI未改善判别能力(AUC 0.898至0.904)。对于握力低下,L3 SMI无显著性(p=0.42,AUC=0.774),而加入胸部SMI使AUC增加0.06至0.12,其中T8的增益最大(AUC 0.893)。对于6MWT受损,L3 SMI具有预测价值(p=0.039,AUC=0.750),而胸部SMI则无(所有p>0.10),且未显著改善AUC(0.75-0.79)。 结论。胸部CT衍生的肌肉指数在L3 SMI之外提供了领域特异性的价值,改善了对上身力量的预测,但未改善对吸气肌无力或全身耐力的预测。将胸部肌肉指标与标准L3评估相结合,可能增强肺癌功能风险分层和术前康复计划。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background. L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI) is the CT standard for whole-body sarcopenia but does not assess thoracic musculature and may miss muscle morphology tied to respiratory mechanics and upper-body function. This study evaluated whether thoracic muscle measures provide independent or complementary information beyond L3 SMI for functional and pulmonary performance in lung cancer patients. Methods. Ninety adults with newly diagnosed lung cancer who completed clinically indicated CT imaging and baseline pre-treatment functional assessments were analyzed. SMI was quantified at L3 and thoracic levels (T4, T6, T8, T10). Functional outcomes included handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed, sit-to-stand, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWT). Pulmonary outcomes included maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP, MEP), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), and Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF). Outcomes were examined continuously and dichotomized at clinically relevant thresholds: weak HGS (< 28 kg for men; <18 kg for women), impaired 6MWT (<300 m), and respiratory muscle weakness (MIP ≤ 62/83 cmH 2 O and MEP ≤ 81/≤ 109 cmH 2 O in men/women). Correlations, multivariable linear regression (adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, and tumor stage), and logistic regression assessed associations; incremental predictive value of thoracic SMI beyond L3 was evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results. Thoracic SMI showed moderate-strong correlations with HGS, MIP, MEP, and PEF (r = 0.24-0.63, all p < 0.01). In adjusted models, thoracic SMIs remained associated with HGS (beta = 0.20-0.37, p ≤ 0.007) and several respiratory measures, including MEP at T4/T10 and FVC and PEF at T6/T8. L3 SMI was not independently associated with MEP, MIP, or PEF ( p > 0.10), but was more strongly related to whole-body mobility (TUG and gait speed, both p < 0.02). To connect functional associations with clinical relevance, predictive performance was examined for clinically defined weakness or impairment. For inspiratory muscle weakness, L3 SMI was not predictive (p=0.30; AUC=0.903), and adding thoracic SMI did not improve discrimination (AUCs 0.898 to 0.904). For weak HGS, L3 SMI was not significant (p=0.42, AUC=0.774), whereas adding thoracic SMI increased AUC by 0.06 to 0.12, with T8 showing the largest gain (AUC 0.893). For 6MWT impairment, L3 SMI was predictive (p=0.039, AUC =0.750), while thoracic SMI was not (all p>0.10) and did not meaningfully improve increase AUC (0.75-0.79). Conclusion. Thoracic CT-derived muscle indices provide domain-specific value beyond L3 SMI, improving prediction of upper-body strength but not inspiratory muscle weakness or whole-body endurance. Incorporating thoracic muscle metrics with standard L3 assessment may enhance functional risk stratification and prehabilitation planning in lung cancer.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. R. Erickson, None.. J. Adrover Claudio, None.. C. Hong, None.. K. Batai, None.. A. Ray, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索