PO.CTP01.01 · 进行中的临床试验

自体GD2-CAR-T细胞治疗复发性GD2阳性胶质母细胞瘤患者一项正在进行的剂量递增研究的初步临床和实验室结果

Initial clinical and laboratory results of an ongoing dose escalation study of autologous GD2-CAR-T cells in patients with recurrent GD2-positive glioblastoma

海报缩略图:自体GD2-CAR-T细胞治疗复发性GD2阳性胶质母细胞瘤患者一项正在进行的剂量递增研究的初步临床和实验室结果
编号 CT070 展板 1 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 51 主讲 Michael Brown, MBBS;PhD
分会场 Phase I Clinical Trials in Progress
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Michael P. Brown1, Abbey Le Blanc1, Sidra Khan2, Sandy Patel1, Jesikah Logan1, Olivia Franze1, Erica C. F. Yeo2, Nga T. H. Truong2, Tessa Gargett2

1Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,2Centre for Cancer Biology, Adelaide, Australia

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
GD2是一个已验证的癌症免疫治疗靶点,在正常组织中的表达高度受限。临床GD2-CAR-T细胞疗法在高GD2表达的儿童弥漫性中线胶质瘤和神经母细胞瘤中具有活性。我们在Royal Adelaide Hospital启动了KARPOS 1期临床试验,对成人复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者静脉给予递增剂量的自体GD2-CAR-T细胞(www.anzctr.org.au - ACTRN12622001514796)。 研究目的:主要:(i)确立CAR-T制备的可行性;(ii)确定安全性特征和剂量限制性毒性(DLT);(iii)确立最大耐受剂量。次要:(i)评估CAR-T的体内持久性和免疫表型及相关血清细胞因子谱,(ii)评估肿瘤反应,(iii)测定6个月无进展生存期(PFS6)和中位总生存期(mOS)。探索性:研究外周血(PB)中CAR-T和髓系细胞的激活及免疫表型,以及PB细胞因子和单细胞mRNA测序(scRNAseq)谱。 方法:患者按3+3剂量递增设计入组:(i)剂量水平0(DL0)——1×10⁷细胞/m²,无预先淋巴清除(LD)化疗;(ii)DL1——1×10⁷细胞/m²,有预先LD化疗;(iii)DL2——3×10⁷细胞/m²,有预先LD化疗。 PB CAR-T采用定量DNA-PCR检测。PB CAR-T扩增程度采用曲线下面积(AUC)和峰值扩增(Cmax)描述。PB细胞免疫表型分析采用多色流式细胞术。细胞因子谱采用LegendPlex ELISA试剂盒生成。采用Olink蛋白质组学检测测定免疫相关的PB分析物。采用PARSE Evercode WT生成和分析PB细胞scRNAseq数据。 结果:8例患者入组:每个DL 3例,其中1例患者在DL1重新入组。除1例患者需要额外细胞外,所有计划的CAR-T剂量均已制备。无归因于CAR-T的安全性问题。未记录DLT。各剂量队列间的Cmax和AUC值无法区分。3例患者因疾病稳定或缓解被允许重复CAR-T输注。其Cmax和AUC值低于首次输注。 按RANO2.0标准,首次输注后脑MR成像显示3例部分缓解、4例疾病稳定和3例疾病进展。PFS6为33%,mOS为8.3个月。 许多患者基线时血清CCL2和CXCL10升高,可能来源于髓系和/或肿瘤。多数患者输注后血清细胞因子显著升高,部分为效应相关细胞因子,但多数反映可能由髓系和肿瘤细胞产生的调节性细胞因子反应。多数患者输注后PB髓系来源抑制细胞数量增加。 结论:GD2-CAR-T细胞疗法可行且安全。即使无LD化疗,CAR-T也能扩增。观察到有限的临床活性,有短暂肿瘤稳定的证据。CAR-T激活与细胞因子驱动的髓系细胞反应相关,这可能最终限制CAR-T活性。在下一批患者队列中,我们将研究脑室内CAR-T注射并尝试药理学中断髓系细胞反应。
查看英文原文 English abstract
GD2 is a validated cancer immunotherapy target with a highly restricted normal tissue expression. Clinical GD2-CAR-T cell therapy is active in high GD2-expressing pediatric diffuse midline glioma and neuroblastoma. We initiated the KARPOS phase 1 clinical trial of escalating doses of intravenously administered autologous GD2-CAR-T cells in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma at Royal Adelaide Hospital (www.anzctr.org.au - ACTRN12622001514796). Study Objectives: Primary: (i) establish feasibility of CAR-T manufacture; (ii) determine safety profile and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs); (iii) establish maximum tolerated dose. Secondary: (i) assess in vivo persistence and immunophenotype of CAR-T and associated serum cytokine profile, (ii) evaluate tumour responses, (iii) measure progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and median overall survival (mOS). Exploratory: investigate in peripheral blood (PB) the activation and immunophenotype of CAR-T and myeloid cells, and PB cytokine and single cell mRNA sequencing (scRNAseq) profiles. Methodology: Patients were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation design at: (i) Dose Level 0 (DL0) - 1x10 7 cells/m 2 without prior lymphodepletion (LD) chemotherapy; (ii) DL1 - 1x10 7 cells/m 2 with prior LD chemotherapy; and (iii) DL2 - 3x10 7 cells/m 2 with prior LD chemotherapy. PB CAR-T were measured using quantitative DNA-PCR. Extent of PB CAR-T expansion was described using area under the curve (AUC) and peak expansion (Cmax). PB cell immunophenotyping was done by multi-colour flow cytometry. Cytokine profiles were generated using LegendPlex ELISA kits. Olink proteomics assays were used to measure PB analytes of immune interest. PARSE Evercode WT was used to generate and analyse PB cell scRNAseq data. Results: Eight patients were enrolled: 3 at each DL, with one patient re-enrolled at DL1. All planned CAR-T doses were manufactured except one patient required extra cells. No safety concerns were attributed to CAR-T. No DLTs were recorded. Cmax and AUC values were indistinguishable between dose cohorts. Three patients had repeat CAR-T infusions allowed because of stable or responding disease. Cmax and AUC values were lower than for first infusions . By RANO2.0 criteria after the first infusion there were 3 cases of partial response, 4 stable disease, and 3 progressive disease on brain MR imaging. PFS6 was 33% and mOS was 8.3 months. Many patients had baseline elevations in serum CCL2 and CXCL10, which may be myeloid- and/or tumour-derived. Most patients had significant post-infusion rises in serum cytokines with some instances of effector-related cytokines, but most reflected probable regulatory cytokine responses made by myeloid and tumour cells. Post-infusion increases in PB myeloid-derived suppressor cell numbers were seen in most patients. Conclusions: GD2-CAR-T cell therapy was feasible and safe. CAR-T expanded even without LD chemotherapy. Limited clinical activity was observed with evidence of transient tumour stabilisation. CAR-T activation was associated with evidence of a cytokine-driven myeloid cell reaction that may ultimately limit CAR-T activity. In the next patient cohorts, we will investigate intracerebroventricular CAR-T injections and attempt pharmacologic interruption of the myeloid cell reaction.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. P. Brown, Merck, Sharp, and Dohme Other, Honoraria paid to institution for advisory board attendance. Bristol Myers Squibb Other, Honoraria paid to institution for advisory board attendance. A. Le Blanc, None.. S. Khan, None.. S. Patel, None.. J. Logan, None.. O. Franze, None.. E. C. F. Yeo, None.. N. T. H. Truong, None.. T. Gargett, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索