PO.ET01.01 · 实验与分子治疗
高灵敏度靶向质谱实现HLA提呈抗原的定量,用于TCR-T治疗靶点的发现
High-sensitivity targeted mass spectrometry enables quantification of HLA-presented antigens for TCR-T therapeutic target discovery
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:
人类白细胞抗原(HLA)是适应性免疫的关键介导者,可提呈源自自身和非自身蛋白的抗原肽以供免疫监视。由体细胞突变产生的肿瘤特异性新抗原是免疫识别的关键决定因素,也是靶向免疫疗法开发的核心。免疫肽组学的最新进展已实现对这些肽段的系统性鉴定;然而,准确定量免疫原性表位对于评估其治疗相关性仍至关重要。对(新)抗原丰度的精确测量可为T细胞受体(TCR)疗法以及个性化疫苗和细胞疗法的设计提供依据。因此,能够跨细胞或组织材料对肽段提呈进行分析的高灵敏度定量方法,对于推进精准免疫肿瘤学和免疫调节疗法至关重要。
方法:
目前测量提呈抗原的方法受限于灵敏度低和繁琐的优化流程。为克服这些问题,我们采用了一种靶向质谱方法(FAIMS-PRM),结合一步碰撞能量(CE)优化,如近期一篇文献(Salek等,2024)所述的工作流程,以系统性优化碰撞能量并提高检测灵敏度。这一简化方法能够以最少的输入材料(2500万个细胞或15 mg新鲜冷冻组织)稳健、经济且高效地开发和优化针对免疫肽的靶向检测。引入稳定同位素标记的内标(SIS肽)可实现绝对定量并估算每个细胞的拷贝数。
结果:
为展示优化工作流程的性能,我们在包括SK-MEL-5、Raji和HCT116在内的多个细胞系中定量了HLA I类提呈的(新)抗原。分析组合包括源自公认TCR-T和肿瘤特异性抗原(TSA)靶点(如PRAME、MAGE-A1和NY-ESO-1)的肽段,以及在先前发现研究中鉴定出的候选抗原。与默认设置相比,基于碰撞能量的优化使约50%的靶向肽段的信号强度得到提升。该方法实现了低个位数范围(每个细胞1-3拷贝)的定量下限(LLOQ),能够精确定量低丰度免疫肽。这些结果说明了该工作流程在准确测量临床相关HLA提呈靶点方面的灵敏度和稳健性。
总之,这些进展提供了一种灵敏而高效的工作流程,可用于跨疾病和健康样本对HLA提呈肽段进行定量评估,从而支持免疫疗法开发中有前景靶点的鉴定。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background
Human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are key mediators of adaptive immunity, presenting antigenic peptides derived from self and non-self proteins for immune surveillance. Tumor-specific neoantigens generated by somatic mutations represent key determinants of immune recognition and are central to the development of targeted immunotherapies. Recent advances in immunopeptidomics have enabled systematic identification of these peptides; however, accurate quantification of immunogenic epitopes remains essential to assess their therapeutic relevance. Precise measurement of (neo)antigen abundance can inform the design of T-cell receptor (TCR)-based therapeutics, as well as personalized vaccines and cell therapies. Highly sensitive, quantitative methods for profiling peptide presentation across cell or tissue materials are therefore critical to advancing precision immuno-oncology and immune-modulatory therapies.
Method
Current methodologies to measure presented antigens are hampered by low sensitivity, and laborious optimization procedures. To overcome these issues, we applied a targeted mass spectrometry approach (FAIMS-PRM) combined with a one-step collision energy (CE) optimization, as described in a recent publication (Salek et al. 2024) workflow to systematically optimize collision energy and improve assay sensitivity. This streamlined method enables robust, cost- and time-efficient development and optimization of targeted assays for immunopeptides using minimal input material: 25 million cells or 15 mg of fresh-frozen tissue. Incorporating stable isotope-labeled internal standards (SIS peptides) allowed absolute quantification and estimation of copy number per cell.
Results
To demonstrate the performance of the optimized workflow, we quantified HLA I-presented (neo)antigens in multiple cell lines, including SK-MEL-5, Raji and HCT116. The analysis panel comprised peptides derived from well-established TCR-T and tumor-specific antigen (TSA) targets such as PRAME, MAGE-A1, and NY-ESO-1, alongside candidate antigens identified in prior discovery studies. Application of the collision energy-based optimization improved signal intensity for approximately 50% of targeted peptides compared with default settings. The method achieved lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) in the low single-digit range (1-3 copies per cell), enabling precise quantification of low-abundance immunopeptides. These results illustrate the sensitivity and robustness of the workflow for accurate measurement of clinically relevant HLA-presented targets.
In conclusion, these advances provide a sensitive and efficient workflow for quantitative assessment of HLA-presented peptides across disease and healthy samples, supporting identification of promising targets for immunotherapy development.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Savickas, None..
A. Pfeiffer, None..
A. Viodé, None..
L. Malinovska, None..
O. Bernhardt, None..
V. Laforte, None..
L. Yang, None..
R. Bruderer, None..
D. Redfern, None..
Y. Feng, None..
W. Paes, None.