PO.ET03.02 · 实验与分子治疗
Midasin抑制破坏sumoylation轴,通过改变转录网络损害乳腺球体稳定性
Midasin inhibition disrupts the sumoylation axis to impair mammosphere stability through alteration of transcriptional network
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
内分泌耐药仍是有效治疗雌激素受体阳性(ER+)乳腺癌的主要障碍,这就需要识别维持肿瘤生长、可塑性以及癌症干细胞(CSC)相关表型的分子驱动因素。Midasin(MDN1)是核糖体生物发生的关键调控因子,在内分泌耐药肿瘤中升高,但其对芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)耐药的作用尚不明确。在此,我们研究了在2D和3D培养中AI敏感的AC-1细胞和AI耐药的LTLT-Ca细胞对MDN1抑制的差异性反应。基础特征分析显示AC-1细胞中芳香化酶(1.2倍)和ERalpha(1.6倍)表达较高,而LTLT-Ca细胞的EGFR和HER2分别升高7倍和3.85倍,在3D乳腺球体中EGFR和HER2进一步扩增(最高达4倍)。虽然在2D条件下AC-1细胞中MDN1水平较高,但MDN1在LTLT-Ca乳腺球体中富集,将升高的核糖体生物发生与耐药、干细胞样表型联系起来。用MDN1抑制剂Rbin-2(18 µM)处理可显著降低MDN1表达,并破坏两种模型中的球体结构。AC-1球体表现出中度体积缩小(第12天时由1010.5 µm²降至731.7 µm²),而较大的LTLT-Ca球体(1204.5 µm²)变得碎裂且不规则(1539.3 µm²),提示结构崩解而非缩小。吖啶橙/溴化乙锭染色显示AC-1中活/死荧光比值下降65%,而LTLT-Ca为14%,与敏感细胞中广泛的退化和耐药球体中的不稳定性一致。球体侵袭实验显示在Rbin-2处理后,AC-1和LTLT-Ca的基质外生均有中度减少。LTLT-Ca乳腺球体表达升高的OCT4和SOX2,在MDN1抑制后分别下降49%和45%,提示MDN1参与维持CSC转录网络。SUMO化动力学分析显示耐药细胞中SUMO2/3固有较高,Rbin-2处理后进一步升高,与midasin相关细胞死亡减少一致。相反,同样在耐药细胞中升高的去SUMO化酶SENP3,在两种细胞系中均被Rbin-2降低。SUMO2/3升高伴随SENP3下降反映了MDN1依赖性的稳态破坏,并与ALDH1A1减少和CSC特性丧失相符。总体而言,这些发现确定了一条SUMO2/3-SENP3-MDN1调控轴,该轴支持AI耐药乳腺癌的干性和侵袭性,并证明MDN1抑制可破坏该轴,从而损害乳腺球体完整性、削弱CSC程序并抑制侵袭。这项工作确立了MDN1作为克服AI耐药的一个有前景的治疗性脆弱靶点。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Endocrine resistance remains a major barrier to effective treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, necessitating identification of molecular drivers that sustain tumor growth, plasticity, and cancer stem cell (CSC) associated phenotypes. Midasin (MDN1), a key regulator of ribosome biogenesis, is elevated in endocrine-resistant tumors, yet its contribution to aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance is not well defined. Here, we examined differential responses to MDN1 inhibition in AI-sensitive AC-1 and AI-resistant LTLT-Ca cells cultured in 2D and 3D. Basal characterization showed higher aromatase (1.2-fold) and ERalpha (1.6-fold) expression in AC-1 cells, while LTLT-Ca cells exhibited 7-fold and 3.85-fold increase in EGFR and HER2, respectively, with further EGFR and HER2 amplification (up to 4-fold) in 3D mammosphere. Although MDN1 levels were higher in AC-1 cells under 2D conditions, MDN1 was enriched in LTLT-Ca mammosphere, linking elevated ribosome biogenesis to the resistant, stem-like phenotype. Treatment with the MDN1 inhibitor, Rbin-2 (18 µM) significantly reduced MDN1 expression and disrupted spheroid architecture in both models. AC-1 spheroids displayed moderate size reduction (1010.5 µm² to 731.7 µm² by day 12), whereas larger LTLT-Ca spheroids (1204.5 µm²) became fragmented and irregular (1539.3 µm²), indicating structural collapse rather than shrinkage. Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide staining revealed a 65% decrease in the live-to-dead fluorescence ratio in AC-1 versus 14% in LTLT-Ca, consistent with extensive degeneration in sensitive cells and instability in resistant spheroids. Spheroid invasion assays showed modest reduction in matrix outgrowth in both AC-1 and LTLT-Ca after Rbin-2 exposure. LTLT-Ca mammospheres expressed elevated OCT4 and SOX2, which decreased by 49% and 45% respectively, following MDN1 inhibition, implicating MDN1 in sustaining CSC transcriptional networks. Analysis of SUMOylation dynamics revealed intrinsically higher SUMO2/3 in resistant cells, with a further increase upon Rbin-2 treatment, consistent with decreased midasin associated cell death. Conversely, the deSUMOylase SENP3, also elevated in resistant cells, was reduced by Rbin-2 in both lines. This increase in SUMO2/3 coupled with decreased SENP3 reflects MDN1-dependent disruption of homeostasis and aligns with reduced ALDH1A1 and loss of CSC properties. Collectively, these findings identify a SUMO2/3-SENP3-MDN1 regulatory axis that supports, stemness and invasiveness in AI-resistant breast cancer, and demonstrate that MDN1 inhibition disrupts this axis to impair mammosphere integrity, attenuate CSC programs, and suppress invasion. This work establishes MDN1 as a promising therapeutic vulnerability for overcoming AI resistance.
利益披露 Disclosure
B. Banjara, None..
A. Ohemeng, None..
A. Hudson, None..
A. M. Davidson, None..
J. L. Pope, None.