PO.BCS02.01 · 生物信息与计算

Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone

海报缩略图:Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone
编号 35 展板 20 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 2 主讲 Kim Blenman, BS;MS;PhD
分会场 Agentic AI in Cancer
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Kim Blenman, Ondrej Blaha, Sherry Qiu, Kelly Chen, Kiera Spall, Yiran Liu, Madsion Williams, Marissa Villa, Valeri Vankov, Kwabena Oteng Agyapong, Di Li, Holly Rushmeier

Yale University, New Haven, CT

摘要 Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Differential expression (DE) analysis is the cornerstone of omics evaluation. It is used to identify biomarkers for cancer, therapeutic response, and drug-induced adverse events. DE methods use AI/ML (machine learning). If multiple DE methods could identify the same biomarkers, this would strongly support the biomarker's use as a robust candidate(s) for wet lab validation studies. It is unclear if the top DE methods identify the same biomarkers (i.e., shared). Therefore, we evaluated 4 DE methods for their ability to identify shared serum autoantibodies in cancer patients with and without immune-checkpoint inhibitor induced hypothyroidism (TEAE ThyDis). METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (N=8) or melanoma (N=25) who were treated with durvalumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combination who had TEAE ThyDis (N = 18) or No TEAE (N = 15) were included. Four DE methods (limma, DESeq2, edgeR, randomForest) were used in R. 15,500 pre-treatment autoantibodies with and without ComBat batch correction were evaluated for each patient. RESULTS: In patients with breast cancer, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 201, 109, 158, and 472 biomarkers, respectively (Table 1). However, only up to 53 biomarkers were shared between the 4 DE methods. ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 125 and 484 biomarkers respectively and up to 114 shared biomarkers between the 4 methods. In patients with melanoma, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 198, 244, 568, and 1042 biomarkers respectively with up to 183 biomarkers shared (Table 1). ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 196 and 1088 biomarkers respectively and up to 257 shared. There was no biomarker that was shared in all methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that top AI/ML DE analysis methods identify different biomarkers. As a field, it is time to re-evaluate and re-vamp these tools as well as create new tools to ensure robust reproducible biomarker identifications.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Blenman, CareVive ). O. Blaha, None.. S. Qiu, None.. K. Chen, None.. K. Spall, None.. Y. Liu, None.. M. Williams, None.. M. Villa, None.. V. Vankov, None.. K. Oteng Agyapong, None.. D. Li, None.

在会议检索中打开