PO.IM01.10 · 免疫学
重塑免疫排斥型肿瘤微环境:Vactosertib/抗PD-1/VEGF抑制剂三联疗法在CRC中重建抗肿瘤免疫
Rewiring the immune-excluded tumor microenvironment: Vactosertib/anti-PD-1/VEGF inhibitor triplet therapy reinstates antitumor immunity in CRC
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)取得了临床成功,但占结直肠癌(CRC)大多数的微卫星稳定(MSS)肿瘤仍对抗PD-1疗法耐药。虽然VEGF/VEGFR靶向联合疗法可提供部分缓解,但它们无法充分重建免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境(TME)。TGF-beta信号传导在CRC中诱导免疫排斥和基质纤维化,导致对VEGF和PD-1阻断的耐药。在本研究中,我们探讨了在具有PD-1耐药性的CT26 CRC模型中,vactosertib(Vac,一种TGF-beta I型受体抑制剂)与抗PD-1和VEGF抑制剂联合给药时能否克服这种耐药性。
方法与结果:为建立具有临床意义的PD-1耐药模型,将最初对抗PD-1疗法有应答但后来根据RECIST标准进展的CT26肿瘤连续传代,以建立CT26-alphaPD-1/R2细胞系。进展期间维持的PD-1抗体结合表明耐药并非由于靶点结合减少所致。对荷瘤的BALB/c小鼠给予FDA批准的泛VEGFR抑制剂呋喹替尼(Fru)、抗PD-1抗体和/或Vac。Vac增强了Fru(TGI 10%→47%)和抗PD-1(TGI 17%→42%)单药的疗效。三联联合疗法显示出20-33%的完全缓解率,展现出比抗PD-1与抗VEGF双重阻断(TGI 50%)显著更强的抗肿瘤效应(TGI 86%)。随后的RNA-seq分析显示,三联联合疗法是唯一诱导强效瘤内免疫应答的治疗。具体而言,三联疗法激活了T细胞并上调了涉及髓系活化、吞噬作用和抗原呈递的基因,同时还增加了B细胞活化。TIL分析显示,与Vac+Fru、抗PD-1+Fru和Vac+抗PD-1联合疗法相比,三联疗法使IFNgamma⁺CD8+ T细胞分别增加了6.0倍、12.6倍和3.9倍。活化的CD4+ T细胞和M1/M2巨噬细胞的比例显示出相似的模式。此外,三联疗法优先增强了效应记忆T细胞,提示持久且富含记忆的适应性免疫。在使用VEGFR2选择性抑制剂的第二次试验中,Vac同样改善了VEGFR2抑制剂加抗PD-1疗法的疗效(TGI 39%→63.3%)。
结论:在PD-1耐药的CRC中,使用Vac、抗PD-1抑制剂和VEGFR抑制剂的三重阻断相比所有其他双联疗法实现了更优的抗肿瘤疗效和广泛的免疫激活。这些结果表明,TGF-beta抑制对于克服免疫抑制性TME中的治疗耐药至关重要,支持在难治性CRC中对该三联组合进行临床评估。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Despite the clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors, which account for the majority of colorectal cancer (CRC), remain resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy. While VEGF/VEGFR-targeted combination therapies can provide partial remission, they fail to sufficiently reconstitute the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). TGF-beta signaling induces immune exclusion and stromal fibrosis in CRC, contributing to resistance to VEGF and PD-1 blockade. In this study, we investigated whether vactosertib (Vac), a TGF-beta receptor type I inhibitor, could overcome this resistance when administered in combination with anti-PD-1 and VEGF inhibitors in the CT26 CRC model with PD-1 resistance.
Methods and Results: To establish a clinically meaningful PD-1 resistance model, CT26 tumors that initially responded to anti-PD-1 therapy but later progressed according to RECIST criteria were serially passaged to establish the CT26-alphaPD-1/R2 cell line. Maintained PD-1 antibody binding during progression indicated that resistance was not due to reduced target engagement. BALB/c mice bearing tumors were treated with the FDA-approved pan-VEGFR inhibitor fruquintinib (Fru), an anti-PD-1 antibody, and/or Vac. Vac enhanced the efficacy of Fru (TGI 10% → 47%) and anti-PD-1 (TGI 17% → 42%) monotherapy. Triple combination therapy showed a complete response rate of 20-33%, demonstrating a significantly greater antitumor effect (TGI 86%) than dual blockade of anti-PD-1 and anti-VEGF (TGI 50%). Subsequent RNA-seq analysis revealed that the triple combination therapy was the only treatment that induced a robust intratumoral immune response. Specifically, the triplet activated T cells and upregulated genes involved in myeloid activation, phagocytosis, and antigen presentation, while also increasing B cell activation. TIL analysis showed that the triplet increased IFNgamma⁺CD8 + T cells by 6.0-, 12.6-, and 3.9-fold compared to Vac + Fru, anti-PD-1 + Fru, and Vac + anti-PD-1 combination therapy, respectively. The ratios of activated CD4 + T cells and M1/M2 macrophages showed a similar pattern. Furthermore, the triplet preferentially enhanced effector memory T cells, suggesting persistent and memory-rich adaptive immunity. In a second trial using a VEGFR2-selective inhibitor, Vac similarly improved the efficacy of VEGFR2 inhibitor plus anti-PD-1 therapy (TGI 39% → 63.3%).
Conclusions: Triple blockade using Vac, an anti-PD-1 inhibitor, and a VEGFR inhibitor achieved superior antitumor efficacy and broad immune activation compared to all other dual combination therapies in PD-1-resistant CRC. These results suggest that TGF-beta inhibition is essential for overcoming treatment resistance in an immunosuppressive TME, supporting the clinical evaluation of this triple combination in refractory CRC.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Patent.
D. Kang,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
H. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
S. Yoo,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
J. Bae,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
J. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
M. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
J. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
J. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
Y. Kim,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
J. Lee,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.
K. Yoon,
MedPacto, Inc. Employment.