PO.MCB01.01 · 分子与细胞生物学

小分子抑制剂对多种哺乳动物物种CDK/Cyclin复合物疗效的生化比较评估

Comparative biochemical evaluation of small-molecule inhibitor efficacy on CDK/Cyclin complexes across diverse mammalian species

海报缩略图:小分子抑制剂对多种哺乳动物物种CDK/Cyclin复合物疗效的生化比较评估
编号 1902 展板 10 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 20 主讲 Andreas Gericke
分会场 Cell Cycle
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Andreas Gericke1, Frank Totzke1, Constance Rademann2, Carolin Heidemann-Dinger1, Daniel Mueller1

1Reaction Biology Europe GmbH, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany,2Reaction Biology Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)及其相关的周期蛋白(cyclin)是细胞周期进程和转录调控的核心调节因子。CDK/Cyclin复合物的失调是许多癌症的标志性特征,可驱动不受控制的增殖和肿瘤发展。因此,这些复合物已成为肿瘤学中的关键靶点,其中CDK4/6抑制剂已确立为治疗例如激素受体阳性乳腺癌的基石,并正在研究用于其他恶性肿瘤。CDK抑制剂的早期临床前开发依赖于生化筛选试验来鉴定能够抑制CDK/Cyclin活性的小分子。这些试验常基于激酶活性测定,可对化合物库进行高通量评估,并为抑制剂的效力和选择性提供重要见解。这些方法对于合理药物设计是必需的,可指导先导化合物的优化以提高疗效并减少脱靶效应。尽管这些早期筛选策略在预测细胞和体内反应方面存在明显局限性,但它们对于塑造当前一代CDK及其他激酶靶向治疗药物具有重要作用。在后续开发阶段,采用细胞和体内模型系统来验证抑制剂活性并评估药效学和毒性。许多此类模型基于非人类哺乳动物物种,例如鼠类或灵长类系统。这些研究对于弥合生化筛选与临床应用之间的差距至关重要,可确保候选分子在进入人体试验之前证明其疗效和安全性。然而,尽管此类数据具有重要意义,但在早期生化筛选中很少评估人类与非人类试验结果是否一致。对候选药物对不同物种激酶靶点效应的潜在差异进行此类早期生化评估,可为选择最相关的细胞或体内模型系统用于后续药物开发提供有价值的见解。在此,我们展示了针对来源于人、大鼠、小鼠、犬和灵长类的CDK/Cyclin复合物测试的后期开发或已获批CDK抑制剂的生化比较数据,重点关注CDK4/CycD1。值得注意的是,观察到几种化合物具有不同的抑制效力,包括palbociclib,其对人类和鼠类酶的CDK4/CycD1抑制之间存在约十倍的差异。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their associated cyclins are central regulators of cell cycle progression and transcriptional control. Dysregulation of CDK/Cyclin complexes is a hallmark of many cancers, driving uncontrolled proliferation and tumor development. Consequently, these complexes have become critical targets in oncology, with CDK4/6 inhibitors already established as a cornerstone in the treatment of e.g. hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and under investigation for other malignancies. Early preclinical development of CDK inhibitors relies on biochemical screening assays to identify small molecules capable of inhibiting CDK/Cyclin activity. These assays, frequently based on kinase activity measurements, enable high-throughput evaluation of compound libraries and provide essential insights into inhibitor potency and selectivity. These approaches are mandatory for rational drug design, guiding the optimization of lead compounds toward improved efficacy and reduced off-target effects. Despite their obvious limitations in predicting cellular and in vivo responses, these early screening strategies are instrumental in shaping the current generation of CDK- and other kinase-targeted therapeutics. In subsequent development stages, cellular and in vivo model systems are employed to validate inhibitor activity and assess pharmacodynamics and toxicity. Many of these models are based on non-human mammalian species, such as murine or primate systems. These studies are essential for bridging the gap between biochemical screening and clinical application, ensuring that candidate molecules demonstrate efficacy and safety before entering human trials. However, despite the importance of such data, it is rarely assessed in early biochemical screening whether results from human and non-human assays are consistent. Such early biochemical evaluation of potential differences in the effects of drug candidates on the kinase target from different species could generate valuable insights to select the most relevant cellular or in-vivo model systems for advanced drug-development. Here, we present comparative biochemical data for late-stage development or already approved CDK inhibitors tested against CDK/Cyclin complexes from human, rat, mouse, dog and primate origin, focusing on CDK4/CycD1. Notably, differential inhibitory potency was observed for several compounds, including palbociclib, which showed an approximately ten-fold difference in CDK4/CycD1 inhibition between human and murine enzymes.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Gericke, Reaction Biology Europe GmbH Employment. F. Totzke, Reaction Biology Europe GmbH Employment. C. Rademann, Reaction Biology Europe GmbH Employment. C. Heidemann-Dinger, Reaction Biology Europe GmbH Employment. D. Mueller, Reaction Biology Europe GmbH Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索