PO.MCB06.01 · 分子与细胞生物学
重激活逆转座子在鳞状癌中引发固有免疫的同时保护正常组织
Retrotransposon reactivation to elicit innate immunity in squamous cancers while sparing normal tissues
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
转座子占人类基因组的40%以上,虽然大多数无活性,但少数逆转座子仍能够跳跃,从而促成突变和遗传变异。鳞状细胞癌(SCC),包括来自头颈部、食管、肺、宫颈、肛门生殖器部位和皮肤的鳞癌,在所有分析的癌症中表现出特别高的逆转座子活性,然而其致病机制和治疗潜力仍知之甚少。
我们通过使用一种在成年小鼠皮肤中缺乏内源性逆转录病毒(ERV,一种类似逆转录病毒的逆转座子)关键表观遗传抑制因子的遗传模型来应对这些挑战。在我们的模型中,我们观察到强烈的ERV诱导,伴随逆转录病毒肽的产生和病毒样颗粒的组装,导致干细胞耗竭和脱毛表型,这些表型可通过抑制逆转录酶的抗病毒药物在体内逆转(Lyu Y等,Ge Y。Cell。2024)。
在本研究中,我们剖析了宿主约束和响应ERV重激活的机制,并利用这些通路在保护正常组织的同时抑制SCC。逆转座子重激活在肿瘤中引发宿主抗病毒反应,即所谓的病毒模拟,我们在皮肤中重现了这一现象。有趣的是,我们观察到ERV与SINE(短散在核元件,另一类逆转座子)引发的两条在遗传和生化上分歧的通路,它们分别负责皮肤致病和肿瘤进展。此外,尽管逆转座子重激活在癌症患者中普遍与抗病毒反应相关,但这种相关性仍依赖于环境背景,其解偶联常常发生却无法解释。我们在模型中观察到逆转座子诱导与抗病毒反应之间有趣的解偶联现象。我们进一步注意到,不同的异染色质抑制因子协同作用,不仅决定不依赖逆转座子的抗病毒反应,还能在存在逆转座子重激活的情况下削弱抗病毒反应。最后,我们提出了与逆转座子相关的SCC特异性弱点,这些弱点可在保护正常组织的同时加以攻克。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Transposons make up over 40% of the human genome, and while most are inactive, a few retrotransposons remain capable of jumping, contributing to mutations and genetic variation. Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) including those from the head and neck, esophagus, lung, cervix, anogenital sites and skin show particularly high retrotransposon activity among all cancers analyzed, yet their pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic potential remain poorly understood.
We tackle these challenges by using a genetic model lacking a crucial epigenetic repressor of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs, a type of retrotransposons resembling retroviruses) in the adult murine skin. We saw in our model robust ERV induction, accompanied by retroviral peptides production and viral like particles assembly, leading to stem cell exhaustion and hair loss phenotypes, which can be reversed in vivo by antiviral drugs that inhibit reverse transcriptase (Lyu Y et al, Ge Y. Cell. 2024).
In the current study, we dissect host mechanisms restraining and responding to ERV reactivations, and leverage these pathways to inhibit SCCs while sparing normal tissues. Retrotransposon reactivation elicits host antiviral responses in the tumors, known as viral mimicry, which we recapitulated in the skin. Interestingly, we observed two genetically and biochemically diverging pathways elicited by ERVs versus SINEs (short interspersed elements, another type of retrotransposons), that are responsible for skin pathogenesis and tumor progression. Moreover, while retrotransposon reactivations are widely associated with antiviral responses in cancer patients, such correlations remain context dependent, and their decoupling often occurs unexplained. We saw intriguing decoupling of retrotransposon induction and antiviral response in our model. We further noted that distinct heterochromatin repressors cooperate to not only dictate retrotransposon-independent antiviral responses, but also blunt antiviral responses despite the presence of retrotransposon reactivations. Finally, we propose retrotransposon related SCC specific vulnerabilities that can be tackled while sparing normal tissues.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Xue, None..
Y. Lyu, None..
Y. Ge, None.