PO.PS01.05 · 人群科学

代谢综合征与癌症之间的关联:一项系统评价

The association between metabolic syndrome and cancer: A systematic review

海报缩略图:代谢综合征与癌症之间的关联:一项系统评价
编号 2355 展板 21 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 36 主讲 Rebecca Mattson, PhD;RN
分会场 Epidemiology: Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Patterns, and Methodology
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Rebecca Mattson1, Mary Barger2, Arjan De Van Der Star1, Uduak George1

1San Diego State University, San Diego, CA,2University of San Diego, San Diego, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:代谢综合征(MetS)是中心性肥胖、高血压、血糖异常、高甘油三酯血症和低HDL胆固醇的集合,已被认为是肺癌发病率和死亡率的一个可能决定因素。 目的:评估MetS与肺癌发病率和死亡率之间的关联,并检查各研究间异质性的来源。 方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价。检索了CINAHL、Web of Science和PubMed,时间范围为2000年1月至2025年3月,纳入报告了MetS(按NCEP ATP III、IDF或类似标准定义)与癌症结局关系的成年人研究的校正效应估计值。两名评价者独立筛选研究、提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。进行了叙述性综合和随机效应meta分析,并按性别、吸烟状况、地理区域和MetS定义进行亚组分析。使用I²统计量和Cochran's Q评估异质性,使用Egger检验检查发表偏倚。 结果:在筛选的2,607条记录中,11项研究符合纳入标准。在肺癌发病率的meta分析中,合并风险比为1.18(95% CI 1.04-1.33,p=.010),表明MetS个体的肺癌风险更高。异质性显著(I²=97.6%,p<.001)。 结论:所评价的研究表明MetS与肺癌发病率增加存在关联。对MetS进行临床评估可能识别出癌症风险升高的个体,为早期肺癌筛查和预防策略提供支持。进一步的研究应确定将癌症预防纳入MetS管理是否影响长期癌症结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of central adiposity, hypertension, dysglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol, has been identified as a possible determinant of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Objective: To evaluate the association between MetS and lung cancer incidence and mortality, and examine sources of heterogeneity across studies. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. CINAHL, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched from January 2000 through March 2025 for studies in adults that reported adjusted effect estimates for the relationship between MetS, defined by NCEP ATP III, IDF, or similar criteria, and cancer outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Narrative synthesis and random effects meta-analysis were performed, with subgroup analyses by sex, smoking status, geographic region, and MetS definition. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic and Cochran's Q, and publication bias was examined using Egger's test. Results: Of 2,607 records screened, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis of lung cancer incidence, the pooled hazard ratio was 1.18 (95% CI 1.04-1.33, p =.010), indicating a higher hazard of lung cancer among individuals with MetS. Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 97.6 percent, p < .001). Conclusions: The reviewed studies indicate that MetS has an association with increased lung cancer incidence. Clinical evaluation for MetS may identify individuals at elevated cancer risk, supporting early lung cancer screening and preventive strategies. Further research should determine whether integrating cancer prevention into MetS management influences long-term cancer outcomes.
利益披露 Disclosure
R. Mattson, None.. M. Barger, None.. A. De Van Der Star, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索