PO.CL01.01 · 临床研究
纵向外周血TCR追踪预测免疫检查点抑制剂反应
Longitudinal peripheral blood TCR tracking predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗已彻底改变了肿瘤学,但仍迫切需要可靠的生物标志物来预测临床反应。对T细胞受体(TCR)库进行静态的单时间点分析已被证明不够充分。我们假设对TCR克隆动态的纵向追踪将提供一种更强大、更具预测性的临床结局生物标志物。
方法:为检验这一假设,我们采用了两阶段策略。首先,我们对公开的纵向TCR-seq数据集GSE212217进行了探索性分析,以研究TCR克隆的动态变化是否能够区分反应者与非反应者。基于观察到的时间扩增模式,我们开发了一种新的分类模型,通过量化TCR克隆相对丰度随时间变化的方向和幅度对其进行算法分类。根据应用于其纵向轨迹的特定定量标准,将克隆划分为不同的行为类型:反应型(Response)、超反应型(Super-response)、瞬时型(Transient)和静息型(Quiescent)。其次,我们在一个独立的、前瞻性的晚期黑色素瘤患者试点队列中,使用系列血样的TCR测序验证了该模型。
结果:对公开数据集的分析证实,基线TCR多样性指标无法区分临床反应者与非反应者。相比之下,我们的纵向模型识别出了不同的克隆扩增轨迹。在发现队列中,这一新的反应评分在反应者中显著高于非反应者(Wilcoxon检验,P = 0.011)。关键的是,评分高的患者表现出明显的生存优势(Log-rank P = 0.040),证实了我们动态指标的临床预后价值。在我们独立的黑色素瘤队列中的验证证实了该模型的临床实用性。引人注目的是,疾病进展的患者表现出活跃、扩增克隆的比例较低(5.5%),而获得深度临床反应的患者则表现出明显更高的活跃、扩增克隆比例(10.5%)。
结论:我们开发并验证了一种基于T细胞克隆动态扩增的新型生物标志物,能够有效预测ICI反应和生存。这项工作彻底超越了静态TCR指标的局限性,确立了纵向克隆追踪作为液体活检的一项关键策略。该方法为癌症免疫治疗的实时反应监测和精准分层提供了关键工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized oncology, reliable biomarkers to predict clinical response are critically needed. Static, single-time-point analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire has proven inadequate. We hypothesized that the longitudinal tracking of TCR clonal dynamics would provide a more powerful and predictive biomarker of clinical outcome.
Methods: To test this hypothesis, we employed a two-stage strategy. First, we performed an exploratory analysis on the public longitudinal TCR-seq dataset GSE212217 to investigate whether dynamic changes in TCR clones could distinguish responders from non-responders. Based on the observed temporal expansion patterns, we developed a novel classification model that categorizes TCR clones algorithmically by quantifying the direction and magnitude of change in their relative abundance over time. Clones are assigned to distinct behavioral types, Response, Super-response, Transient, and Quiescent, based on specific, quantitative criteria applied to their longitudinal trajectories. Second, we validated this model in an independent, prospective pilot cohort of advanced melanoma patients using TCR sequencing from serial blood samples.
Results: Analysis of the public dataset confirmed that baseline TCR diversity metrics were unable to differentiate between clinical responders and non-responders. In contrast, our longitudinal model identified distinct clonal expansion trajectories. This novel response score was significantly elevated in responders compared to non-responders in the discovery cohort (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.011). Critically, patients with a high score exhibited a marked survival advantage (Log-rank P = 0.040), confirming the clinical prognostic value of our dynamic metric. Validation in our independent melanoma cohort confirmed the clinical utility of our model. Strikingly, the patient with disease progression exhibited a low proportion of active, expanding clones (5.5%), whereas the patient achieving a deep clinical response demonstrated a markedly higher proportion of active, expanding clones (10.5%).
Conclusion: We have developed and validated a novel biomarker based on the dynamic expansion of T-cell clones that effectively predicts ICI response and survival. This work definitively moves beyond the limitations of static TCR metrics, establishing longitudinal clonal tracking as a crucial strategy for liquid biopsy. This approach provides a critical tool for real-time response monitoring and precision stratification of cancer immunotherapy.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Wang, None..
K. Xu, None..
P. J. Li, None..
D. J. H. Shih, None..
M. K. L. Chiu, None..
J. W. H. Wong, None..
W. Dai, None..
A. El Helali, None.