PO.CL01.01 · 临床研究
一种从组织病理切片计算得出的、可稳健预测晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌免疫检查点抑制临床结局的标志物
A robust predictive marker of clinical outcomes to immune-checkpoint inhibition in advanced squamous head-and-neck cancer calculated from histopathological slides
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂,即程序性死亡-1(PD-1)抑制剂,可延长晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的生存期。联合阳性评分(CPS)指导治疗选择,但其预测价值有限,凸显了在该领域开发准确且实用的生物标志物的必要性。ENLIGHT-DP可直接从苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片扫描图预测靶向和免疫治疗的临床结局。我们此前已表明ENLIGHT-DP可预测接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的HNSCC以及其他适应症的结局。在此,我们使用交叉验证(CV)在一个HNSCC病例队列上训练和测试ENLIGHT-DP生物标志物,并进一步在两个独立队列上进行验证。
方法:我们获取了来自国立阳明交通大学(NYCU)89例接受一线PD-1抑制剂±化疗的晚期HNSCC患者的治疗前肿瘤H&E切片高分辨率扫描图。所有病例均有应答数据(RECIST v1.1),其中65例有长期随访。使用该数据集,我们以留4法交叉验证训练了一个预测应答的模型。该模型包括:(1)将切片分割为256x256像素的图块,(2)使用深度学习模型提取图块特征,(3)使用多层感知机预测图块状态,(4)使用基于注意力的多示例学习将图块状态汇集为全切片状态,(5)使用线性层从汇集状态预测应答。我们报告了该数据集上的CV结果,以及同一模型在两个先前报道的队列——Hadassah医学中心(Hadassah,n=25,Oral Oncology 2025)和玛格丽特公主癌症中心(BIO2,n=14,JITC 2019,ASCO 2025)上的性能。
结果:该模型对NYCU队列中的ORR具有预测性,ROC AUC为0.67,并能够分层无进展生存期(PFS,HR:0.943,p=0.017)。将该模型应用于Hadassah队列得到ROC AUC为0.76,并可分层PFS(HR:0.89,p=0.023),而该队列可获得的CPS则无预测能力(AUC=0.47,PFS关联无统计学意义)。将该模型应用于BIO2队列同样得到ROC AUC为0.76,并显示出PFS预测的无统计学意义的趋势。CPS在应答预测方面表现出弱得多的效应,AUC为0.56,且与PFS无显著关联。
结论:ENLIGHT-DP IO生物标志物可直接从全H&E切片图像扫描图预测免疫治疗应答,并在预测HNSCC对PD-1抑制剂±化疗的ORR方面表现出高预测能力。尽管该模型在相对较小的队列上、仅使用应答标签进行训练,但在应答和PFS方面均取得了显著结果,并能很好地推广至两个独立队列,在这些队列上其性能优于常用的PD-L1 IHC标志物。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, namely programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, prolong survival in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The combined positive score (CPS) guides treatment selection but has limited predictive value, underscoring the need for development of accurate and practical biomarkers in this space. ENLIGHT-DP predicts clinical outcomes to targeted and immune therapies directly from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide scans. We previously showed that ENLIGHT-DP is predictive of outcomes in HNSCC treated with PD-1 inhibitors and in other indications. Here, we train and test an ENLIGHT-DP biomarker on a cohort of HNSCC cases using cross-validation (CV), and further validate it on two independent cohorts.
Methods: We obtained high resolution scans of pre-treatment tumor H&E slides of 89 advanced HNSCC patients from National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitors +/- chemotherapy. Response (RECIST v1.1) was available for all cases, and long-term follow up for 65 of them. Using this dataset, we trained a model to predict response, in leave-4-out-CV. The model consists of (1) splitting the slides into tiles of 256x256 pixels, (2) extracting tile features using a deep learning model, (3) predicting tile states using a multi-layered perceptron, (4) pooling the tile states into a whole slide state using attention-based multiple instance learning, and (5) Predicting the response from the pooled state using a linear layer. We report the CV results on this dataset, as well as the performance of the same model on two previously reported cohorts from Hadassah Medical Center (Hadassah, n=25, Oral Oncology 2025) and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (BIO2, n=14, JITC 2019, ASCO 2025).
Results: The model is predictive of ORR in the NYCU cohort with ROC AUC of 0.67 and was able to stratify progression free survival (PFS, HR: 0.943, p=0.017). Applying the model to the Hadassah cohort resulted in ROC AUC of 0.76, and stratification of PFS (HR: 0.89, p=0.023), while CPS, which was available for that cohort, exhibited no predictive power (AUC=0.47, insignificant PFS association). Applying the model to the BIO2 cohort also resulted in ROC AUC of 0.76 and showed an insignificant trend for PFS prediction. CPS exhibited a much weaker effect for response prediction, with an AUC of 0.56, and insignificant association with PFS.
Conclusion: The ENLIGHT-DP IO biomarker predicts response to immunotherapy directly from whole H&E slide image scans and demonstrates high predictive power for ORR to PD-1 inhibitors +/- chemo in HNSCC. Although the model was trained on a relatively small cohort and using only response labels, it achieves significant results in terms of both response and PFS and generalizes well to two independent cohorts, on which it outperforms the commonly used PD-L1 IHC marker.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Kinar,
Pangea Biomed Employment, Stock Option.
G. Dinstag,
Pangea Biomed Employment, Stock Option.
R. Aharonov,
Pangea Biomed Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock Option.
J. Arnon, None..
A. Elia, None..
C. Park, None..
C. H. Lopes, None.