LBPO.CL01 · 临床研究 · Late-Breaking
由循环肿瘤DNA确定的前列腺癌表型与177Lu-PSMA-617治疗的结局相关
Prostate cancer phenotypes determined from circulating tumor DNA associate with outcomes to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)是一种致死性疾病,在识别延长生存期的治疗药物和预测治疗应答的生物标志物方面存在重大的未满足临床需求。前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)放射性配体177Lu-PSMA-617(177Lu-PSMA)已被证实可提高总生存期(OS),但应答差异很大。对来自液体活检的游离DNA(cfDNA)进行分析,为无创地描绘肿瘤基因组学和表型特征、并识别可预测177Lu-PSMA结局的标志物提供了一个窗口。
方法:我们研究了一个由140例符合177Lu-PSMA治疗临床指南的mCRPC患者组成的真实世界前瞻性队列。我们通过全基因组测序分析了治疗前和治疗中的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA),以定量ctDNA丰度并评估肿瘤来源的基因组特征,如拷贝数改变、体细胞突变和结构重排。我们还采用了一种名为Proteus的新型计算工具,该工具利用ctDNA片段组学谱来确定单个基因的表达以及构成一系列相关肿瘤表型的表达程序,这些表型包括mCRPC谱系亚型、增殖评分和缺氧特征,它们可能合理地影响对177Lu-PSMA的应答。肿瘤表型特征与PSMA-PET和SPECT影像学结果相整合,并评估其与临床结局的关联。
结果:治疗前ctDNA分数与OS密切相关(多变量HR=2.19,P=0.002),独立于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)应答,并与PSMA-PET和FDG-PET的总肿瘤体积呈正相关(分别为R=0.59和R=0.69)。应答不佳者的特征是基线ctDNA分数更高、基因组不稳定性及总体肿瘤突变负荷更高。DNA修复基因ATM中的有害改变与OS改善相关,而MYC扩增与生存较差相关。源自ctDNA的肿瘤表型特征,包括细胞周期增殖评分、神经内分泌分化以及8号染色体上的复杂拷贝数变异,均独立地与临床结局相关。
结论:我们的发现表明,基线ctDNA分析可为接受177Lu-PSMA治疗的mCRPC患者提供预后信息。ctDNA分数和数量,连同特定的基因组改变和肿瘤表型特征,代表了有前景的、可无创获取的生物标志物,可用于指导患者选择、改善治疗监测,并进一步剖析177Lu-PSMA耐药的基因组机制。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a lethal disease with a major unmet clinical need to identify therapeutics that extend survival and biomarkers that predict treatment responses. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand, 177 Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA) is documented to increase overall survival (OS), but responses are highly variable. Analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsies offers a non-invasive window to profile tumor genomics and phenotypes, and identify markers predictive of 177 Lu-PSMA outcomes.
Methods: We interrogated a real-world prospective cohort of 140 patients with mCRPC meeting clinical guidelines for 177 Lu-PSMA treatment. We analyzed pre-treatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by whole genome sequencing to quantitate ctDNA abundance and assess tumor-derived genomic features such as copy number alterations, somatic mutations, and structural rearrangements. We also employed a novel computational tool termed Proteus that uses ctDNA fragmentomic profiles to determine the expression of individual genes as well as expression programs that comprise a spectrum of relevant tumor phenotypes including mCRPC lineage subtypes, proliferation scores, and hypoxia signatures that may plausibly influence responses to 177 Lu-PSMA. Tumor phenotype characteristics were integrated with PSMA-PET and SPECT imaging findings and evaluated for associations with clinical outcomes.
Results: Pre-treatment ctDNA fraction was strongly associated of OS (multivariate HR=2.19, P =0.002), independent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and correlated positively with PSMA- and FDG-PET total tumor volume (R=0.59 and R=0.69, respectively). Poor responders were characterized by higher baseline ctDNA fraction, genomic instability, and overall tumor mutational burden. Deleterious alterations in the DNA repair gene ATM were associated with improved OS, whereas MYC amplifications were associated with poorer survival. Tumor phenotype features derived from ctDNA including cell cycle proliferation score, neuroendocrine differentiation, and complex copy number variation on chromosome 8 independently associated with clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that baseline ctDNA analysis provides prognostic information for mCRPC patients undergoing 177 Lu-PSMA therapy. ctDNA fraction and quantity, alongside specific genomic alterations and tumor phenotype features represent promising, non-invasively acquired biomarkers to guide patient selection, improve therapeutic monitoring, and further dissect genomic mechanisms of resistance to 177 Lu-PSMA.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. P. McDeed, None..
R. Patton, None..
R. Gulati, None..
L. Owens, None..
P. Galipeau, None..
P. Chandra, None..
A. Pawar, None..
W. Hanson, None..
R. Dumpit, None..
A. Iravini, None..
A. Ghodsi, None..
D. Chen, None..
M. T. Schweizer, None..
R. Raychaudhuri, None..
M. Haffner, None..
G. Ha, None..
P. S. Nelson, None.