PO.CL01.16 · 临床研究

NRF2通路激活预测喉癌的不良放疗反应:来自一项大型蛋白质基因组学表征研究的见解

NRF2 pathway activation predicts poor radiation response in laryngeal cancer: Insights from a large proteogenomic characterization study

海报缩略图:NRF2通路激活预测喉癌的不良放疗反应:来自一项大型蛋白质基因组学表征研究的见解
编号 3942 展板 17 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 48 主讲 Kelly Gaudian, BS
分会场 Prognostic Biomarkers 2
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Kelly Gaudian, Harit Panda, Emily Wilkerson Zarbock, Kate Zhao, James Sun, Benjamin Wahle, Paul Zolkind, M. Ben Major

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
晚期喉癌患者通常预后不佳,而当前临床指南缺乏可靠的预测性生物标志物。临床前癌症研究已表明,NRF2这一促进抗氧化防御和代谢重编程的转录因子与放射治疗(RT)耐药有关。本研究探讨NRF2通路的激活是否影响接受RT或手术的喉癌患者的临床结局。我们纳入了135例在Siteman综合癌症中心接受手术联合RT或单纯手术治疗的喉癌患者。肿瘤样本取自WashU头颈肿瘤中心组织库,并使用RNA测序、靶向外显子捕获测序和基于质谱的蛋白质组学进行表征。使用基因和蛋白质表达谱独立计算NRF2活性评分,从而沿NRF2活性连续谱对肿瘤进行分类。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型比较NRF2高组与NRF2低组之间的无病生存期(DFS)和局部区域失败(LRF)率。在接受手术联合RT治疗的患者中,差异基因和蛋白质表达分析鉴定出众多与局部区域失败相关的NRF2诱导靶标。在接受放疗的患者中,NRF2高组的结局显著差于NRF2低组,5年LRF率分别为51.0%和17.1%(HR = 7.2,95% CI:2.0-25.7),5年DFS率分别为25.4%和50.7%(HR = 2.9,95% CI:1.3-6.2)。值得注意的是,NRF2活性状态在单纯手术队列中不具有显著预后意义,表明NRF2激活特异性地与放射耐药相关。本体富集分析鉴定出NRF2高肿瘤中与抗氧化反应和双链DNA断裂修复相关通路的上调,提示可能的耐药机制。基于发现的蛋白质组学与基因表达数据高度吻合。外显子捕获测序揭示10例患者携带NRF2或KEAP1的驱动突变,其中9例根据表达数据被归类为NRF2高。逻辑回归确定NRF2评分是与放疗患者结局关联最强的预测变量,其次是淋巴结受累。这些发现提示NRF2激活与接受手术联合放疗(而非单纯手术)的患者的较差结局相关。未来的意义包括跨数据集验证NRF2作为生物标志物,以及开发和测试NRF2靶向疗法。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Patients with advanced laryngeal cancer often experience poor outcomes, and current clinical guidelines lack reliable predictive biomarkers. Preclinical cancer studies have implicated NRF2, a transcription factor that promotes antioxidant defense and metabolic reprogramming, in resistance to radiation therapy (RT). This study investigates whether activation of the NRF2 pathway influences clinical outcomes in larynx cancer patients receiving RT or surgery. We identified 135 larynx cancer patients who were treated at Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center with either surgery and RT or surgery alone. Tumor samples were obtained from the WashU Head & Neck Tumor Center tissue bank and characterized using RNA sequencing, targeted exon capture sequencing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Gene and protein expression profiling were used to independently calculate an NRF2 activity score, allowing the classification of tumors along a continuum of NRF2 activity. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were employed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional failure (LRF) rates between NRF2-high and NRF2-low groups. In patients treated with surgery and RT, differential gene and protein expression analysis identified numerous NRF2-induced targets that were associated with locoregional failure. In those treated with radiation, NRF2-high patients had significantly worse outcomes than NRF2-low, with 5-year LRF rates of 51.0% and 17.1% (HR = 7.2, 95% CI: 2.0-25.7), and 5-year DFS rates of 25.4% and 50.7% (HR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.3-6.2), respectively. Notably, NRF2-activity status was not significantly prognostic in the surgery alone cohort, indicating that NRF2 activation is specifically associated with radiation resistance. Ontological enrichment analyses identified upregulation of pathways associated with antioxidant response and dsDNA break repair in NRF2 high tumors, suggesting possible mechanisms of resistance. Discovery-based proteomics aligned closely with the gene expression data. Exon capture sequencing revealed 10 patients harboring driver mutations in NRF2 or KEAP1, 9 of which were categorized as NRF2 high from expression data. Logistic regression identified NRF2 score as the most predictive variable associated with outcomes for radiation-treated patients, followed by nodal involvement. These findings suggest NRF2 activation is associated with worse outcomes in patients receiving surgery and radiation, but not surgery alone. Future implications include validating NRF2 as a biomarker across data sets and the development and testing of NRF2-targeted therapies.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Gaudian, None.. H. Panda, None.. E. W. Zarbock, None.. K. Zhao, None.. J. Sun, None.. B. Wahle, None.. P. Zolkind, None.. M. Major, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索