PO.CL01.20 · 临床研究
基于尿液的尿路上皮癌检测在可疑上尿路病变中的临床应用价值:改善恶性肿瘤检出并减少不必要的URS
Clinical utility of a urine-based urothelial cancer test in equivocal upper tract lesions: improving malignancy detection and minimizing unnecessary URS
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景和目的:上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)是一种罕见但侵袭性强的恶性肿瘤,通常需要诊断性输尿管肾镜检查(URS),这是一种与感染、输尿管损伤和潜在肿瘤种植相关的侵入性操作。对于影像学表现可疑的患者,是否进行URS的决策具有挑战性,可能导致不必要的操作。因此需要一种无创且准确的诊断工具来改善风险分层。Bladder CARE™是一种基于尿液的表观遗传学检测,对膀胱癌和UTUC具有高准确性,于2023年12月获得FDA突破性设备认定。本研究评估了其在可疑上尿路病变患者中的诊断性能,目标是在选定病例中确认恶性肿瘤并减少不必要的URS。
材料和方法:在2023年12月至2025年8月期间,使用Bladder CARE™分析了46名疑似UTUC患者的尿液样本。所有患者随后接受了URS,在确认恶性时行肾输尿管切除术。使用Bladder CARE指数(BCI)对结果进行分类:阳性(> 10)、低阳性(2.5-10)和阴性(< 2.5)。以URS和/或肾输尿管切除术的组织病理学作为参考标准,计算灵敏度、特异性、PPV和NPV。还评估了BCI与肿瘤分级之间的关联。
结果:患者平均年龄为70岁(16名女性,30名男性);24名UTUC阳性,22名阴性。UTUC阳性病例的平均BCI显著高于阴性病例(85.8对1.7)。阳性类别显示出优异的性能(93%灵敏度,100%特异性,PPV 100%,NPV 95%),支持其用于在适当选定的患者中避免URS。低阳性结果也检测到相当比例的癌症,但确定性较低(86%灵敏度,69%特异性),使得对这些病例进行URS评估较为适当。Bladder CARE™检测到88%的低级别肿瘤和100%的高级别肿瘤,以及90%的Ta和100%的T1-T3肿瘤。细胞学仅检测到19例UTUC中的2例。高级别肿瘤的平均BCI值高于低级别肿瘤(111.7对54.2),T1-T3病变高于Ta病变(136.7对56.0),提示与肿瘤侵袭性相关。
结论:Bladder CARE™展示了强大的诊断准确性,有可能改变UTUC的管理路径。阳性结果可允许直接进展至确定性治疗而无需诊断性URS,从而降低发病率并加快诊疗。BCI与肿瘤分级/分期之间的相关性可能进一步支持治疗选择,包括保肾方法或新辅助治疗。虽然需要多中心验证,但这种无创检测代表了UTUC诊断和临床决策方面一项有前景的进展。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background and Objective: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy that often requires diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS), an invasive procedure associated with infection, ureteral injury, and potential tumor seeding. In patients with equivocal imaging, deciding whether to perform URS is challenging and may lead to unnecessary procedures. A non-invasive and accurate diagnostic tool is therefore needed to improve risk stratification. Bladder CARE™, a urine-based epigenetic assay with high accuracy for bladder cancer and UTUC, received FDA Breakthrough Device Designation in December 2023. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance in patients with equivocal upper-tract lesions, with the goal of confirming malignancy and reducing unnecessary URS in selected cases.
Material and Methods: Between December 2023 and August 2025, urine samples from 46 patients with suspected UTUC were analyzed using Bladder CARE™. All patients subsequently underwent URS, with nephroureterectomy performed when malignancy was confirmed. Results were classified using the Bladder CARE Index (BCI): positive (> 10), low positive (2.5-10), and negative (< 2.5). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated using histopathology from URS and/or nephroureterectomy as the reference standard. Associations between BCI and tumor grade were also assessed.
Results: Patients had a mean age of 70 years (16 female, 30 male); 24 were UTUC-positive and 22 negative. Mean BCI was significantly higher in UTUC-positive cases vs negatives (85.8 vs 1.7). The positive category showed excellent performance (93% sensitivity, 100% specificity, PPV 100%, NPV 95%), supporting its use to avoid URS in appropriately selected patients. Low-positive results also detected a substantial proportion of cancers but with lower certainty (86% sensitivity, 69% specificity), making URS evaluation appropriate for these cases. Bladder CARE™ detected 88% of low-grade and 100% of high-grade tumors, and 90% of Ta and 100% of T1-T3 tumors. Cytology detected only 2 of 19 UTUC cases. Mean BCI values were higher in high-grade vs low-grade tumors (111.7 vs 54.2) and in T1-T3 vs Ta lesions (136.7 vs 56.0), indicating correlation with tumor aggressiveness.
Conclusion: Bladder CARE™ demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy with potential to modify the UTUC management pathway. A positive result may allow direct progression to definitive treatment without diagnostic URS, reducing morbidity and expediting care. The correlation between BCI and tumor grade/stage may further support treatment selection, including kidney-sparing approaches or neoadjuvant therapy. While multicenter validation is needed, this non-invasive assay represents a promising advance in UTUC diagnostics and clinical decision-making.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. Piatti,
Pangea Laboratory g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role).
Y. Chew,
Pangea Laboratory Independent Contractor.
F. Toullier-Garcia,
Pangea Laboratory Employment.
E. Kaufmann, None..
K. Röthlin, None..
P. Baumeister, None..
A. Mattei, None..
C. Fankhauser, None.