PO.ET01.06 · 实验与分子治疗
双特异性抗MUC16×抗DR5抗体IMV-M™通过MUC16引导的DR5(TNFRSF10B)聚集实现肿瘤选择性消退
Tumor-selective regression through MUC16-guided DR5 (TNFRSF10B) clustering by the bispecific anti-MUC16×anti-DR5 antibody IMV-M™
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景
IMV-M是一种双特异性抗MUC16×抗DR5抗体,先前在体外和异种移植模型中表现出强效的MUC16选择性抗肿瘤活性,无需二级交联。在一项初步的非人灵长类动物研究中,重复给予10和20 mg/kg剂量未产生可检测的毒性。在此,我们证明IMV-M通过一种新型的MUC16依赖性机制诱导死亡受体5(DR5;TNFRSF10B)聚集:即多个IMV-M分子在单个MUC16分子上组装。IMV-M对肝细胞系也不具有细胞毒性。
方法
生成了三种共享相同抗DR5臂的双特异性抗体:Sofituzumab(h5A3)×Lexatumumab scFv、11D10/DR5×Lexatumumab scFv,以及(抗荧光素)×Lexatumumab scFv。Sofituzumab识别人MUC16内的多个串联重复序列,而11D10结合单个非重复表位。不结合人细胞的抗荧光素构建体用作阴性对照。通过(i)使用脱落MUC16的ELISA和(ii)使用MUC16阳性细胞的流式细胞术,评估与MUC16的结合。孵育48小时后通过CellTiter-Glo评估细胞毒性。
结果
在饱和状态下,IMV-M与脱落MUC16的结合比11D10/DR5强约11倍,与细胞表面MUC16的结合强约8倍,而表观亲和力相似。只有IMV-M在MUC16阳性的PK-59细胞中诱导细胞毒性,表明MUC16介导的DR5聚集是凋亡所必需的。在肝细胞来源的HepG2和Hep3B细胞(MUC16⁻/DR5⁺)中,IMV-M未表现出细胞毒性,而MUC16⁺/DR5⁺的OVCAR-3细胞在所有浓度下均高度敏感。二级交联未在MUC16阴性细胞中引发杀伤。这些发现表明脱靶肝毒性风险较低,与早期抗DR5抗体的良性安全性特征一致。
结论
双特异性抗体实现有效的DR5激动作用需要高阶受体聚集。IMV-M通过MUC16介导的多个抗体分子在单个MUC16分子上的组装实现这一点,从而实现强效、肿瘤选择性的凋亡而无肝毒性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background
IMV-M, a bispecific anti-MUC16×anti-DR5 antibody, previously showed potent MUC16-selective antitumor activity in vitro and in xenograft models without requiring secondary crosslinking. In a pilot non-human-primate study, repeated 10 and 20 mg/kg dosing produced no detectable toxicity. Here, we demonstrate that IMV-M induces clustering of death receptor 5 (DR5; TNFRSF10B) through a novel MUC16-dependent mechanism: assembly of multiple IMV-M molecules on a single MUC16 molecule. IMV-M also lacked cytotoxicity toward hepatic cell lines.
Methods
Three bispecific antibodies sharing identical anti-DR5 arms were generated: Sofituzumab (h5A3)×Lexatumumab scFv, 11D10/DR5×Lexatumumab scFv, and (anti-fluorescein)×Lexatumumab scFv. Sofituzumab recognizes multiple tandem repeats within human MUC16, whereas 11D10 binds a single non-repetitive epitope. The anti-fluorescein construct, which does not bind human cells, served as a negative control. Binding to MUC16 was evaluated by (i) ELISA with shed MUC16 and (ii) flow cytometry using MUC16-positive cells. Cytotoxicity was assessed by CellTiter-Glo after 48h exposure.
Results
IMV-M bound shed MUC16 ≈11-fold and cell-surface MUC16 ≈8-fold more strongly than 11D10/DR5 at saturation, while apparent affinities were similar. Only IMV-M induced cytotoxicity in MUC16-positive PK-59 cells, demonstrating that MUC16-mediated clustering of DR5 is required for apoptosis. In hepatocyte-derived HepG2 and Hep3B cells (MUC16⁻/DR5⁺), IMV-M showed no cytotoxicity, whereas MUC16⁺/DR5⁺ OVCAR-3 cells were highly sensitive across all concentrations. Secondary crosslinking did not elicit killing in MUC16-negative cells. These findings indicate a low risk of off-target hepatic toxicity, consistent with the benign safety profile of earlier anti-DR5 antibodies.
Conclusions
Effective DR5 agonism by bispecific antibodies requires high-order receptor clustering. IMV-M achieves this through MUC16-mediated assembly of multiple antibody molecules on a single MUC16 molecule, enabling potent, tumor-selective apoptosis without hepatotoxicity.
利益披露 Disclosure
I. M. Gershteyn, None.