PO.ET05.02 · 实验与分子治疗
RC108(一种靶向c-Met的ADC)相比Teliso-V在cMet高表达与HGF依赖性肿瘤细胞之间表现出差异性细胞毒性,提示其潜在的安全性优势
RC108, a c-Met-targeting ADC, exhibits differential cytotoxicity between cMet-high and HGF-dependent tumor cells compared with Teliso-V, suggesting a potential safety advantage
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
Telisotuzumab vedotin(Teliso-V)是首个由FDA于2025年5月批准的靶向c-MET的ADC,用于治疗既往接受过全身治疗、c-MET蛋白高表达的局部晚期或转移性非鳞状NSCLC。异常的c-MET信号传导在肺癌及许多其他恶性肿瘤中频繁出现。c-MET过表达及其配体HGF均可导致c-MET信号过度激活,促进肿瘤增殖、转移和治疗耐药。因此,采用多种模式的c-MET靶向疗法一直受到积极探索。RC108是由荣昌生物开发的一种新型靶向c-MET的ADC。它由一种人源化抗体经可裂解的缬氨酸-瓜氨酸/PABC连接子与细胞毒性载荷单甲基澳瑞他汀E(MMAE)偶联而成。研究人员开展了体外对比研究,评估RC108与Teliso-V,重点关注其结合特性和细胞毒性谱。两种抗体识别c-MET蛋白上不同的表位(bin),尽管它们的抗原结合亲和力和细胞结合特性大致相当,但RC108比Teliso-V表现出更快、更高效的内吞作用。在细胞毒性评估中,研究人员采用Western blot对一组癌细胞系——尤其是肺癌细胞——的c-MET信号状态进行了表征,以区分HGF依赖性激活与HGF非依赖性(c-MET过表达驱动的)激活。结果揭示了一种清晰的模式:RC108在c-MET过表达的肿瘤细胞中表现出与Teliso-V相当或更优的效力,但在HGF依赖性细胞中显示出明显较弱的细胞毒性。尽管其潜在机制仍在进一步研究中,但RC108的临床观察结果支持这样一种假说,即这种差异性活性可能带来潜在的安全性优势。由于HGF依赖性的c-MET信号通常被正常组织用于生理性修复和稳态维持,RC108在HGF驱动细胞中较低的细胞毒性可能意味着其对正常组织信号传导的干扰更小,同时对c-MET过表达驱动的肿瘤仍保持强效活性。在临床上,RC108在早期单药试验中表现出良好且可控的安全性,特点是TRAE发生率低。相比之下,Teliso-V在早期研究中表现出显著毒性,因TRAE导致的停药率相对较高。重要的是,RC108的周围神经病变发生率低,间质性肺病(ILD)发生率明显更低,且未观察到眼部毒性。总之,RC108是一种具有独特性质的c-MET靶向ADC,值得在进一步研究中加以认识,并可能具有潜在改善的安全窗口。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Telisotuzumab vedotin (Teliso-V) is the first c-MET-targeting ADC approved by FDA in May 2025 for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC with high c-MET protein expression in patients who have received prior systemic therapy. Aberrant c-MET signaling is frequently observed in lung cancer and many other malignancies. Both c-MET overexpression and its ligand HGF contribute to hyperactivated c-MET signaling, promoting tumor proliferation, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Consequently, c-MET-targeted therapies employing various modalities have been actively pursued. RC108 is a novel c-MET-targeting ADC developed by RemeGen. It comprises a humanized antibody linked via a cleavable valine-citrulline/PABC linker to the cytotoxic payload monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Comparative in vitro studies were performed to evaluate RC108 versus Teliso-V, focusing on binding characteristics and cytotoxicity profiles. Both antibodies recognize distinct epitopes (bins) on the c-MET protein, and although their antigen-binding affinities and cell-binding properties are broadly comparable, RC108 exhibits faster and more efficient endocytosis than Teliso-V. For cytotoxicity assessment, a panel of cancer cell lines-particularly lung carcinoma cells-was characterized for c-MET signaling status using Western blotting to distinguish HGF-dependent versus HGF-independent (c-MET overexpression-driven) activation. The results revealed a clear pattern that RC108 demonstrated equal or superior potency to Teliso-V in c-MET-overexpressing tumor cells, but showed markedly weaker cytotoxicity in HGF-dependent cells. Although the underlying mechanism is under further investigation, clinical observations with RC108 support the hypothesis that this differential activity may confer a potential safety advantage. Since HGF-dependent c-MET signaling is commonly utilized by normal tissues in physiological repair and homeostasis, the lower cytotoxicity of RC108 in HGF-driven cells may indicate reduced interference with normal tissue signaling while maintaining strong activity against tumors driven by c-MET overexpression. Clinically, RC108 has shown a favorable and manageable safety profile in early monotherapy trials, characterized by a low incidence of TRAEs. In contrast, Teliso-V exhibited notable toxicity in earlier studies, with a relatively high discontinuation rate due to TRAEs. Importantly, RC108 was associated with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, a markedly lower incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD), and no observed ocular toxicity. In summary, RC108 is a c-MET-targeted ADC with distinct properties to be recognized in further studies and may have potentially improved safety margin.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Geng,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
Z. Yu,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
H. Zhong,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
Q. Wang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Lv,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
T. Xiao,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
K. Wang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. Zhang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
X. He,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
L. Wang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Jiang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Liu,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Xin,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
J. Fang,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.
Y. Li,
Remegen Co., Ltd. Employment.