PO.ET07.02 · 实验与分子治疗

drGT:利用药物-细胞-基因异质网络进行注意力引导的药物反应基因评估

drGT: Attention-guided gene assessment of drug response utilizing a drug-cell-gene heterogeneous network

海报缩略图:drGT:利用药物-细胞-基因异质网络进行注意力引导的药物反应基因评估
编号 3139 展板 7 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 18 主讲 Augustin Luna
分会场 Pharmacogenomics and Translational Biomarkers for Precision Cancer Therapy
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Yoshitaka Inoue1, Hunmin Lee2, Tianfan Fu3, Rui Kuang2, Augustin Luna4

1National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD,2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN,3Nanjing University, Nanjing, China,4National Library of Medicine, Rockville, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:仅有准确的药物反应预测不足以产生转化影响;计算模型还必须生成生物学上合理的假设。我们提出drGT,一种涵盖药物、基因和细胞系的异质图神经网络(GNN)模型,通过注意力系数(AC)将预测与面向机制的可解释性相耦合。 结果:drGT编码一个药物-基因-细胞系图,并使用AC来描述药物-基因关联。我们在GDSC1、GDSC2、NCI60和CTRP数据集上评估了预测泛化性(随机、未见药物、未见细胞和零样本划分)和生物学可信度(文本挖掘的PubMed共提及以及与基于结构的DTI预测器的比较)。在此,我们评估了回归(IC50值)和二元分类(细胞系敏感性)两种设置,以反映典型的药物基因组学实验;我们报告回归的R²和分类任务的AUROC。在各基准测试中,drGT始终提供顶尖的回归性能,同时保持具有竞争力的分类准确性。在随机5折交叉验证中,每折随机屏蔽20%的样本用于测试,drGT获得高达0.690的R²(在同类方法中总体排名第1)和高达0.945的AUROC(总体排名第3)。在留一泛化测试中,训练期间排除一个细胞系的所有样本或一种药物的所有样本,drGT分别取得0.692(第1)和0.022(第1)的R²值以及0.706(第3)和0.844(第2)的AUROC。在零样本预测测试中,在GDSC1上训练并在GDSC2上评估,drGT取得0.334(第1)的R²和0.786(第1)的AUROC,二者均为所有模型中的最高分。在可解释性方面,AC衍生的药物-基因关联复现了已知生物学:在NCI60数据集中976种具有已知DTI的药物中,36.9%的预测关联与已确立的DTI相符,63.7%得到PubMed摘要或最先进(SOTA)的基于结构的DTI预测模型的支持。此外,对AC排序基因的过表征分析识别出与作用机制(MoA)一致的通路,如相关激酶抑制剂的KRAS信号通路,为模型预测提供了通路水平的解释。 结论:drGT通过AC衍生的药物-基因关联推进了预测泛化性和以机制为中心的可解释性,提供了SOTA的回归准确性和文献支持的生物学假设,展示了可解释的图学习如何能够弥合AI预测与生物学发现之间的鸿沟。代码:https://github.com/sciluna/drGT
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Accurate drug response prediction alone is insufficient for translational impact; computational models must also generate biologically plausible hypotheses. We present drGT, a heterogeneous graph neural network (GNN) model over drugs, genes, and cell lines that couples prediction with mechanism-oriented interpretability via attention coefficients (ACs). Results: drGT encodes a drug-gene-cell line graph and uses ACs to describe drug-gene associations. We assess both predictive generalization (random, unseen-drug, unseen-cell, and zero-shot splits) and biological credibility (text-mined PubMed co-mentions and comparison to a structure-based DTI predictor) on GDSC1, GDSC2, NCI60, and CTRP datasets. Here, we evaluate both regression (IC50 values) and binary classification (cell-line sensitivity) settings to reflect typical pharmacogenomic experiments; we report R² for regression and AUROC for classification tasks. Across benchmarks, drGT consistently delivers top regression performance while maintaining competitive classification accuracy. Under random 5-fold cross-validation, where 20% of samples are randomly masked for testing in each fold, drGT attains an R² of up to 0.690 (1st overall against similar methods) and an AUROC of up to 0.945 (3rd overall). In leave-one-out generalization tests, where either all samples from one cell line or all samples of one drug are excluded during training, drGT achieves R² values of 0.692 (1st) and 0.022 (1st) and AUROCs of 0.706 (3rd) and 0.844 (2nd), respectively. In the zero-shot prediction test, trained on GDSC1 and evaluated on GDSC2, drGT achieves an R² of 0.334 (1st) and an AUROC of 0.786 (1st), both of which represent the highest scores among all models. For interpretability, AC-derived drug-gene links recover known biology: among 976 drugs from the NCI60 dataset with known DTIs, 36.9% of predicted links match established DTIs, and 63.7% are supported by either PubMed abstracts or a state-of-the-art (SOTA) structure-based DTI prediction model. Moreover, an over-representation analysis of AC-ranked genes identifies mechanism of action (MoA)-consistent pathways, such as KRAS signaling, for relevant kinase inhibitors, providing pathway-level explanations for the model predictions. Conclusions: drGT advances predictive generalization and mechanism-centered interpretability with AC-derived drug-gene links, offering SOTA regression accuracy and literature-supported biological hypotheses, demonstrating how interpretable graph learning can bridge AI prediction and biological discovery. Code: https://github.com/sciluna/drGT
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Inoue, None.. H. Lee, None.. T. Fu, None.. R. Kuang, None.. A. Luna, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索