PO.MCB08.03 · 分子与细胞生物学

扩展液体活检生物标志物发现:在NovaSeq X Plus上使用TSO500 v2进行高分辨率ctDNA分析的多中心分析验证

Scaling liquid biopsy biomarker discovery: Multi-center, analytical validation of high resolution ctDNA profiling using TSO500 v2 on NovaSeq X Plus

海报缩略图:扩展液体活检生物标志物发现:在NovaSeq X Plus上使用TSO500 v2进行高分辨率ctDNA分析的多中心分析验证
编号 3245 展板 10 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 22 主讲 Bart Tegenbos
分会场 Genomic Profiling to Understand Cancer Biology
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Gabriela Edwards Faret1, Emmanuel Rivière1, Silvie Franck1, Bart Tegenbos1, Lisa Van den Bossche1, Joke Verbist1, Lien Heyrman1, Magdalena Lesnicki2, Rachel Raz2, Brian Chapman2, Eric Harness2, Jan Van de Velde1, Dirk Goossens1, Jurgen Del Favero1

1CellCarta, Antwerp, Belgium,2CellCarta, Naperville, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
Illumina的TruSight™ Oncology 500(TSO500)ctDNA v2检测能够从血浆中进行全面的基因组分析,允许在临床研究期间对肿瘤演化进行非侵入性、可重复的监测。该检测覆盖523个临床相关癌症基因的广泛panel,并能仅通过简单的采血灵敏地检测关键生物标志物,如SNV、indel、CNV、基因融合、MSI和TMB。因此,这一仅供研究使用(RUO)的检测非常适合在免疫治疗和靶向治疗开发期间进行探索性生物标志物发现、疗效监测和机制性洞察,而无需新鲜组织活检。 开展了一项验证研究,以表征TSO500 ctDNA v2检测在NovaSeq™ X Plus平台上对ctDNA中523个癌症相关基因进行全面基因组分析的分析性能。该检测在两个CellCarta实验室(比利时安特卫普和美国纳珀维尔)进行评估。使用SNV和indel变异等位基因频率(VAF)阈值为0.5%的参考品评估准确性。在两个中心,该检测对SNV、indel、CNV、MSI和TMB结果均展现出>95%的总体符合率,SNV、indel和CNV的阳性符合率>93.5%,阴性符合率>95%(MSI和TMB无可用的阴性参考品)。精密度评估显示,所有变异类别的批内、批间和操作者间比较的一致性均>97%。 检测下限验证确认了对SNV低至0.25% VAF、indel低至0.5% VAF以及CNV在>1.0倍变化时的100%检出率。该检测的最佳起始量确定为20 ng ctDNA;然而,对更低起始量(10 ng和5 ng)的评估表明,虽然这些样本未能持续达到QC阈值,但SNV和indel的检出仍然稳健,SNV的一致性>98%,indel的一致性>95%。因此,更低的起始材料可用于探索性分析,但需理解覆盖度降低可能限制检出灵敏度(潜在假阴性),但不会引入假阳性变异检出。 这些结果证实,TSO500 ctDNA v2检测能够跨中心提供可重复的高分辨率基因组分析,支持其适用于临床研究中的探索性生物标志物分析和纵向疗效监测。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Illumina's TruSight™ Oncology 500 (TSO500) ctDNA v2 assay, enables comprehensive genomic profiling from plasma, allowing non-invasive, repeatable monitoring of tumor evolution during clinical studies. The assay covers a broad panel of 523 clinically relevant cancer genes and provides sensitive detection of key biomarkers such as SNVs, indels, CNVs, gene fusions, MSI, and TMB, all from a simple blood draw. Therefore, this RUO assay is well-suited for exploratory biomarker discovery, response monitoring, and mechanistic insights during immunotherapy and targeted therapy development without the need for fresh tissue biopsies. A validation study was performed to characterize the analytical performance of TSO500 ctDNA v2 assay on the NovaSeq™ X Plus platform for comprehensive genomic profiling of 523 cancer-related genes in ctDNA. The assay was evaluated at two CellCarta laboratories (Antwerp, Belgium and Naperville, USA). Accuracy was assessed using reference materials with a variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold of 0.5% for SNVs and indels. Across both sites, the assay demonstrated >95% overall percent agreement for SNV, indel, CNV, MSI, and TMB results, with positive percent agreement >93.5% and negative percent agreement >95% for SNV, indel, and CNV (no negative reference materials were available for MSI and TMB). Precision assessments showed >97% concordance for intra-run, inter-run, and inter-operator comparisons across all variant classes. Limit of detection verification confirmed 100% detection of SNVs down to 0.25% VAF, indels down to 0.5% VAF, and CNVs at >1.0 fold change. The optimal input for the assay was determined to be 20 ng ctDNA; however, evaluation of lower inputs (10 ng and 5 ng) demonstrated that while these samples did not consistently meet QC thresholds, SNV and indel detection remained robust, with >98% concordance for SNVs and >95% for indels. Lower input material may therefore be used for exploratory analyses, with the understanding that reduced coverage may limit detection sensitivity (potential false negatives) but does not introduce false-positive variant calls. These results confirm that the TSO500 ctDNA v2 assay delivers reproducible, high-resolution genomic profiling across sites, supporting its applicability for exploratory biomarker analyses and longitudinal response monitoring in clinical studies.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. Edwards Faret, None.. E. Rivière, None.. S. Franck, None.. B. Tegenbos, None.. L. Van den Bossche, None.. J. Verbist, None.. L. Heyrman, None.. M. Lesnicki, None.. R. Raz, None.. B. Chapman, None.. E. Harness, None.. J. Van de Velde, None.. D. Goossens, None.. J. Del Favero, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索