PO.MCB08.03 · 分子与细胞生物学
使用人工构建的多重参考物质评估各种商用提取试剂盒从FFPE中提取的核酸质量与性能
Evaluation of FFPE-extracted nucleic acid quality and performance from various commercial extraction kits using contrived multiplexed reference materials
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
用于肿瘤分析的二代测序(NGS)检测及其他先进基因组技术需要足量且高质量的核酸输入。福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)样本是这些检测中常用但颇具挑战性的一类患者样本。在临床实验室中,患者标本往往有限,因此分析前处理至关重要;从样本中最大化核酸产量很重要,但下游检测中的质量和性能不容牺牲。此外,实验室还必须考虑提取系统的工作流程、易用性和处理时间。高度一致的全流程参考物质可以极大地促进方法评估。在此,我们使用各种Seraseq FFPE标准品,评估了以行业领先的FFPE提取试剂盒所获得核酸的产量、质量和性能。将正常人类细胞经工程改造以携带DNA和/或RNA变异。使用Bio-Rad QX-200微滴式数字PCR(ddPCR)系统对细胞中的变异等位基因频率(VAF)和浓度进行了验证。将细胞进行福尔马林固定、包埋于石蜡块中,并切成10微米厚的切片。使用来自QIAGEN、Promega、Beckman Coulter和AutoGen的各种市售试剂盒进行提取。使用Qubit试剂盒和ddPCR分析产量。使用TapeStation检测评估片段大小和质量。再次通过ddPCR以及若干NGS检测测量VAF和浓度。不同提取试剂盒之间的产量、质量和片段大小存在差异。有趣的是,使用Qubit测定的产量并不总是与ddPCR测量的产量相关。同样地,对于某些DNA变异,不同提取试剂盒测量的VAF之间存在差异,这似乎与邻近序列的GC含量有关。提高提取过程中所用缓冲液的盐浓度可挽救邻近GC%较低区域变异的覆盖度,表明某些提取条件可能不利于准确的变异定量。评估肿瘤分析工作流程从提取到变异检出所有步骤的性能,对于确保高灵敏度和特异性至关重要。从FFPE中提取核酸是一个关键步骤,可能影响检测准确检出患者样本中所有变异的能力。如本研究所示,一种易于获取且包含许多复杂程度各异变异的一致标准品,可成为提取评估和优化中不可或缺的工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Next generation sequencing (NGS) assays and other advanced genomic techniques for tumor profiling require sufficient and high-quality nucleic acid input. Formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples are a common, yet challenging type of patient sample often used in these tests. Often in clinical labs, the patient specimen is limited, so pre-analytical handling is critical; maximizing nucleic acid yield from the sample is important, but quality and performance in downstream assays cannot be sacrificed. Furthermore, labs must consider the workflow of the extraction system, ease of use, and processing time. Highly consistent, whole process reference materials can greatly facilitate method evaluation. Here we assess the yield, quality, and performance of nucleic acids obtained with industry leading FFPE extraction kits using various Seraseq FFPE standards. Normal human cells were engineered to carry DNA and/or RNA variants. Variant allele frequency (VAF) and concentration in the cells were verified using the Bio-Rad QX-200 Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) System. The cells were formalin fixed, embedded in paraffin blocks and sectioned at 10-micron thickness. Extraction was performed with various commercially available kits from QIAGEN, Promega, Beckman Coulter, and AutoGen. Yields were analyzed using Qubit kits and ddPCR. TapeStation assays were used to assess fragment size and quality. VAF and concentration were again measured by ddPCR as well as several NGS assays. Yields, quality, and fragment size were variable between extraction kits. Interestingly, yields determined using Qubit did not always correlate with those measured by ddPCR. Similarly, for some DNA variants, there was a discrepancy between VAFs measured by different extraction kits, which seemed to be related to the GC content of nearby sequences. Increasing the salt concentration of buffer used in the extraction process rescued coverage of variants with lower nearby GC% regions indicating some extraction conditions can be detrimental to accurate variant quantification. Assessing performance of all steps of a tumor profiling workflow, from extraction to variant calling, is imperative to ensure high sensitivity and specificity. Extraction of nucleic acids from FFPE is a critical step that can affect the ability of the assay to accurately detect all variants in a patient sample. As shown here, a consistent standard that is readily available and contains many variants of varying complexity can be an invaluable tool in extraction assessment and optimization.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. J. Ruminski Lowe, None..
R. Howard, None..
S. Roque, None..
P. Kamineni, None..
E. S. Davis, None..
A. Anfora, None..
Y. Konigshofer, None..
C. Huang, None..
R. K. Garlick, None.