PO.PS01.02 · 人群科学

乳腺癌作为第二原发癌与作为第一原发癌诊断后的生存差异

Survival differences after diagnosis of breast cancer as second primary cancer vs as first primary cancer

海报缩略图:乳腺癌作为第二原发癌与作为第一原发癌诊断后的生存差异
编号 3563 展板 13 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 34 主讲 Chun Chao, PhD
分会场 Cancer Surveillance: Emerging Cancer Trends and Population Differences
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Chun R. Chao1, Hui Zhou1, Cody Ramin2, Lanfang Xu1, Kimberly Cannavale1, Hyuna Sung3

1Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente - Southern California, Pasadena, CA,2Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA,3American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:第二原发癌(SPC)的发病率正在上升。在美国,每年新诊断的所有癌症中约有20%被估计为SPC。既往基于SEER登记数据的研究提示,与同类型的第一原发癌(FPC)相比,SPC的生存较差。然而,这些研究并未考虑合并症、肥胖、吸烟和保险状态等预后因素。我们在一个大型的整合式医疗服务系统中,考察了乳腺癌作为SPC与作为FPC诊断后的生存情况。 方法:我们利用Kaiser Permanente Southern California(KPSC)的癌症登记数据,识别出2000-2022年间被诊断为浸润性乳腺癌作为FPC(FPC队列)或SPC(SPC队列)的18-84岁女性会员。对这些女性进行随访,直至最早发生死亡、后续原发癌诊断、KPSC退保或2023/12/31。确定全因死亡率和乳腺癌特异性死亡率。采用Fine and Gray亚分布风险回归,在考虑竞争风险的情况下估计SPC队列与FPC队列的生存差异。多变量模型校正了诊断时年龄、分期、乳腺癌亚型(luminal A、luminal B、HER2富集型和三阴性)、种族/族裔、诊断年份、Charlson合并症指数、体重指数和吸烟。按诊断时年龄(<50岁和≥50岁)、分期和亚型进行分层分析。 结果:乳腺FPC队列和SPC队列分别纳入了42,972名和6,363名女性(诊断时平均年龄:59.8岁 vs. 66.0岁)。两个队列中约半数参与者为种族/族裔少数群体。FPC队列的65%和SPC队列的71%在局限期被诊断。在平均7年的随访期间,共观察到7,148例(17%)和1,647例(26%)死亡,其中FPC队列和SPC队列分别有4,035例(9%)和838例(13%)乳腺癌特异性死亡。在多变量校正模型中,SPC队列的总体死亡率较FPC队列升高[校正风险比(aHR)= 1.35(1.27-1.43)]。SPC队列的乳腺癌特异性死亡率也升高:aHR=1.27(1.17-1.38)。按年龄、分期或亚型分层时观察到相似的发现(aHR范围为1.33-1.40),但三阴性乳腺癌的SPC乳腺癌特异性死亡率未升高[aHR=1.04(0.85-1.27)]是个例外。 结论:在一个已参保的人群中,在校正预后因素后,乳腺SPC诊断后的总体死亡率和乳腺癌特异性死亡率均高于乳腺FPC诊断后的死亡率。需要进一步研究以阐明造成生存差异的原因,从而为乳腺SPC的管理提供依据。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: The incidence of second primary cancer (SPC) is on the rise. In the United States, about 20% of all new cancers diagnosed annually are estimated to be SPC. Prior studies of the SEER registries suggested that survival was inferior in SPC compared with that in the first primary cancer (FPC) of the same type. However, these studies did not account for prognostic factors such as comorbidity, obesity, smoking, and insurance status. We examined survival after breast cancer diagnosis as a SPC vs. as a FPC in a large integrated health care delivery system. Methods: We identified female members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) aged 18-84 years diagnosed with an invasive breast cancer as a FPC (for the FPC cohort) or SPC (for the SPC cohort) between 2000-2022 using KPSC's cancer registry. Women were followed until the earliest occurrence of death, diagnosis of a subsequent primary cancer, KPSC disenrollment, or 12/31/2023. All-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality were ascertained. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard regression was used to estimate survival differences in the SPC and the FPC cohort accounting for competing risks. Multivariable models adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage, breast cancer subtype (luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and triple negative), race/ethnicity, year of diagnosis, Charlson's comorbidity index, body mass index, and smoking. Stratified analyses were performed by age at diagnosis (<50 yrs and ≥50 yrs), stage, and subtype. Results : A total of 42,972 and 6,363 women were included in the breast FPC and SPC cohort (the mean age at diagnosis: 59.8 yr vs. 66.0 yr), respectively. About half of participants in both cohorts were racial/ethnic minorities. Sixty-five percent of the FPC cohort and 71% of the SPC cohort were diagnosed at localized stage. During a mean follow-up of 7 years, a total of 7,148 (17%) and 1,647 (26%) deaths were observed, including 4,035 (9%) and 838 (13%) breast cancer-specific deaths in the FPC and SPC cohort, respectively. In multivariable-adjusted models, there was an elevated overall mortality in the SPC cohort compared with the FPC [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.35 (1.27-1.43)]. Elevated breast cancer-specific mortality was also noted in the SPC cohort: aHR=1.27 (1.17-1.38). Similar findings were observed when stratified by age, stage, or subtype (aHRs range between 1.33-1.40), with the exception that breast cancer-specific mortality was not elevated in SPC for triple-negative breast cancer [aHR=1.04 (0.85-1.27)]. Conclusion : Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were higher after a breast SPC diagnosis compared to that after a breast FPC diagnosis among an insured population adjusting for prognostic factors. Further research is needed to shed light on the reasons underly the survival difference to inform management for the breast SPC.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. R. Chao, Merck & Co., Inc. ). H. Zhou, None.. C. Ramin, None. L. Xu, Merck & Co., Inc.   ). K. Cannavale, Merck & Co., Inc. ). H. Sung, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索