PO.PS01.02 · 人群科学
免疫检查点抑制时代的跨癌种死亡率趋势:一项美国癌症统计数据的合成控制分析
Cross-cancer mortality trends in the era of immune checkpoint inhibition: A synthetic control analysis of U.S. cancer statistics
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)改善了多种晚期癌症的生存,尤其是黑色素瘤和非小细胞肺癌。它们对人群层面癌症死亡率的总体影响尚不明确。
方法:我们使用了来自CDC WONDER的1999-2019年美国癌症统计死亡率数据。按癌症部位和年份划分的死亡数据以2000年美国人口进行年龄标准化。我们定义了一个“早期ICI”癌症群组(皮肤黑色素瘤;肺和支气管;肾和肾盂;膀胱;霍奇金淋巴瘤),并从所有其他具有完整数据的部位构建了一个合成控制组。合成控制模型将1999-2013年作为干预前期,2014-2019年作为ICI时代。我们比较了年龄调整死亡率,并通过将死亡率差距乘以人口规模将差异转化为“避免的死亡数”。采用空间安慰剂和时间安慰剂分析以及部位特异性对照评估稳健性。作为交叉验证,我们采用交错采纳双重差分法,使用各部位首次ICI批准的年份。
结果:早期ICI群组在2014年后年龄调整死亡率的下降幅度略大于其合成控制组。2014-2019年间,死亡率平均比合成控制组低每100,000人0.41例死亡,相当于相对于反事实趋势估计避免了27,394例死亡。干预前拟合接近(均方根预测误差[RMSPE] 0.18),干预后RMSPE较高(0.47;后/前比值2.58)。在空间安慰剂分析中,若干非ICI癌症具有更大的RMSPE比值,表明这种偏离并非独有。使用较早假设干预年份(2006-2010年)的时间安慰剂分析产生的RMSPE比值(1.39-1.81)小于2014年设定。部位层面的合成控制表明黑色素瘤、肺癌和霍奇金淋巴瘤避免了死亡,但肾癌和膀胱癌出现了超额死亡,表明存在异质性。交错采纳双重差分法估计的平均治疗效应为每100,000人-0.96例死亡(95% CI -3.22至1.31),与适度获益或无效应相一致。
结论:在这项全国性合成控制分析中,早期获批ICI的癌症死亡率下降幅度略大于其他癌症,转化为可能避免的数万例死亡。然而,安慰剂分析和双重差分表明这些获益是适度的、异质的,并且与残余混杂或护理的同期进展相符。因此,ICI似乎是近期癌症死亡率改善的一个重要贡献因素,但并非唯一驱动因素。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve survival in several advanced cancers, especially melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. Their overall impact on population-level cancer mortality is unclear.
Methods: We used U.S. Cancer Statistics mortality data from CDC WONDER, 1999-2019. Deaths by cancer site and year were age-standardized to the 2000 U.S. population. We defined an “early-ICI” cancer cluster (cutaneous melanoma; lung and bronchus; kidney and renal pelvis; urinary bladder; Hodgkin lymphoma) and constructed a synthetic control from all other sites with complete data. Synthetic-control models treated 1999-2013 as the pre-intervention period and 2014-2019 as the ICI era. We compared age-adjusted mortality and translated differences into “deaths averted” by multiplying the mortality gap by population size. Robustness was assessed with placebo-in-space and placebo-in-time analyses and site-specific controls. As a cross-check, we applied staggered-adoption difference-in-differences using year of first ICI approval by site.
Results: The early-ICI cluster had a modestly greater decline in age-adjusted mortality than its synthetic control after 2014. From 2014-2019, mortality averaged 0.41 deaths per 100,000 lower than the synthetic control, corresponding to an estimated 27,394 deaths averted versus the counterfactual trend. Pre-intervention fit was close (root-mean-square prediction error [RMSPE] 0.18), with higher post-intervention RMSPE (0.47; post/pre ratio 2.58). In placebo-in-space analyses, several non-ICI cancers had larger RMSPE ratios, indicating that the divergence was not unique. Placebo-in-time analyses using earlier hypothetical intervention years (2006-2010) produced smaller RMSPE ratios (1.39-1.81) than the 2014 specification. Site-level synthetic controls suggested deaths averted for melanoma, lung cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma but excess deaths for kidney and bladder cancers, indicating heterogeneity. Staggered-adoption difference-in-differences estimated an average treatment effect of −0.96 deaths per 100,000 (95% CI −3.22 to 1.31), consistent with modest benefit or no effect.
Conclusions: In this national synthetic-control analysis, cancers with early ICI approvals had slightly greater mortality declines than other cancers, translating to tens of thousands of potentially averted deaths. However, placebo analyses and difference-in-differences indicate that these gains are modest, heterogeneous, and compatible with residual confounding or concurrent advances in care. ICIs thus appear to be an important contributor, but not the sole driver, of recent improvements in cancer mortality.
利益披露 Disclosure
W. Lee, None..
S. Aziz, None..
S. Won, None..
M. Asghar, None..
R. Park, None..
T. Shimshak, None.