PO.SHP01.01 · 科学与健康政策

临床医生对AI辅助的肿瘤生育教育数字健康干预的态度、信念与认知

Attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions of clinicians on AI-assisted digital health interventions for oncofertility education

海报缩略图:临床医生对AI辅助的肿瘤生育教育数字健康干预的态度、信念与认知
编号 3680 展板 7 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 39 主讲 Bhakthi Sahgal, Dr PH
分会场 Science and Health Policy 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Bhakthi Sahgal, Alvaro Rivera-Andrade, John F. Russell, Ornsiree Junchaya, Pavani Chalasani, Naomi Seiler

George Washington University, Washington, DC

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:生育力保存咨询是癌症诊疗的关键组成部分,然而患者在及时、易懂地获取信息方面往往面临不平等和障碍。数字化及AI赋能的教育工具或有助于扩大可及性并使沟通标准化,但对于一线临床工作人员如何看待其可接受性、实用性、可信度或适宜性,我们知之甚少。理解这些视角对于确保新兴技术促进而非加剧肿瘤生育诊疗中的不平等至关重要。 方法:本前瞻性定性研究将在两家代表不同层级机构的癌症中心开展,一家为NCI指定中心,另一家为非NCI指定中心,以涵盖多样化的组织情境和诊疗提供环境。将对多学科临床领导层与工作人员完成半结构化访谈,包括主任、肿瘤科医生、生殖内分泌科医生、高级执业医疗人员、肿瘤科护士以及参与肿瘤生育相关沟通的肿瘤科社工。访谈提纲将借鉴以患者为中心的沟通框架、以人为本的设计原则,以及与可接受性、实用性、可信度和适宜性相关的实施科学构念。访谈过程将进行录音、转录,并在NVivo中采用演绎-归纳混合的主题分析方法,以识别与信任、可用性、隐私、可及性、文化相关性和感知临床价值相关的模式。 预期结果:本研究将产生关于临床团队如何看待并如何在肿瘤生育情境中使用数字化及AI赋能的生育力保存教育工具的洞见。研究结果将强调在不同机构情境下影响其可接受性、感知实用性和可信度的因素。分析将凸显关键的设计和实施考量,从而为在NCI指定和非NCI癌症中心负责任地开发和部署支持肿瘤生育沟通的数字工具提供参考。 意义:研究结果将为公平地设计和实施以患者为中心、经临床医生认可、具有文化敏感性的生育力保存数字健康干预提供依据。结果将指导肿瘤沟通工作流程中负责任的数字工具采用,并支持在多样化的癌症诊疗环境中改善患者参与度、诊疗质量和公平性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Fertility preservation counseling is a critical component of cancer care, yet patients often face disparities and barriers to timely, comprehensible information. Digital and AI-enabled educational tools may help expand access and standardize communication, but little is known about how frontline clinical staff perceive their acceptability, utility, trustworthiness, or appropriateness. Understanding these perspectives is essential to ensure emerging technologies promote, rather than exacerbate, inequities in oncofertility care. Methods: This prospective qualitative study will be conducted at two cancer centers representing different tiers of institutions, an NCI-designated and a non-NCI-designated, to capture diverse organizational contexts and care delivery environments. Semi-structured interviews will be completed with multidisciplinary clinical leadership and staff, including directors, oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, advanced practice providers, oncology nurses, and oncology social workers involved in oncofertility-related communication. Interview guides will draw on patient-centered communication frameworks, human-centered design principles, and implementation-science constructs related to acceptability, utility, trustworthiness, and appropriateness. Sessions will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in NVivo using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic approach to identify patterns related to trust, usability, privacy, accessibility, cultural relevance, and perceived clinical value. Expected Outcomes: This study will generate insights into how clinical teams perceive and would engage with digital and AI-enabled fertility preservation education tools within onco-fertility settings. Findings will underline the factors influencing their acceptability, perceived utility, and trustworthiness across different institutional contexts. The analysis will highlight key design and implementation considerations that can inform the responsible development and deployment of digital tools supporting oncofertility communication across both NCI-designated and non-NCI cancer centers. Implications: Findings will inform the equitable design and implementation of patient-centered, clinician-endorsed, culturally responsive digital health interventions for fertility preservation. Results will guide responsible digital tool adoption in oncology communication workflows and support improvements in patient engagement, care quality, and equity across diverse cancer care settings.
利益披露 Disclosure
B. Sahgal, Oncovana g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Patent, Trademark. A. Rivera-Andrade, None.. J. F. Russell, None.. O. Junchaya, None.. P. Chalasani, None.. N. Seiler, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索