PO.TB03.05 · 肿瘤生物学

用于评估癌症侵袭和免疫治疗疗效的双柱共培养(DPC)平台

Double-pillar co-culture (DPC) platform for evaluating cancer invasion and immunotherapy efficacy

海报缩略图:用于评估癌症侵袭和免疫治疗疗效的双柱共培养(DPC)平台
编号 3471 展板 10 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 30 主讲 Seung Joon Kim, MD
分会场 Migration and Invasion
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Seung Joon Kim1, Sung Jae Chang2, Sang-Yun Lee3, Sang Hyo Kim2, Bosung Ku4, Dong Woo Lee2

1The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea, Republic of,2Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of,3Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of,4Medical & Bio Decision (MBD) Co., Ltd, Suwon-si, Korea, Republic of

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:共培养是评估癌症侵袭和免疫治疗疗效的一项重要体外技术,因为肿瘤-基质和肿瘤-免疫相互作用对癌症进展和治疗反应具有关键影响。传统实验(如基于Transwell的迁移或侵袭系统)存在局限,因为它们无法同时定量细胞侵袭和活力,从而降低了生理相关性。为解决这一问题,我们开发了一种双柱共培养(DPC)平台,能够进行高通量筛选,同时在空间上明确的3D结构中培养两种不同的细胞类型。包埋于Matrigel中的癌细胞被接种到中央柱上,形成3D肿瘤样斑点,而基质细胞(包括成纤维细胞或免疫细胞)则包埋于Matrigel中,位于环绕核心、略低的外柱表面。这种配置可直接可视化来自中央团块的侵袭,并同时监测细胞活力。 方法:使用DPC平台将A549肺癌细胞与基质细胞(成纤维细胞或淋巴细胞)共培养。对于药物筛选,施加包括免疫检查点靶向药物在内的化合物,以评估其对侵袭和活力的影响。为评估免疫细胞毒性,A549细胞在中央柱中稳定三天,随后以1:5的比例将Jurkat细胞加入外柱,并共培养较长时间。使用活细胞成像和基于荧光的实验定量侵袭和活力,并与单培养或溶剂处理对照进行比较。 结果:A549细胞与成纤维细胞共培养随时间推移增加侵袭。使用多种化合物进行的高通量筛选显示对癌细胞侵袭具有抑制作用。其中,EGFR抑制剂Dacomitinib将侵袭减少<40%,同时保持>95%的活力,证明其抗侵袭活性独立于细胞毒性。与Jurkat细胞共培养使癌细胞活力较单培养降低约55%,证实了显著的免疫介导细胞毒性。 结论:DPC平台提供了一个生理相关的高通量系统,可同时评估癌症侵袭和免疫细胞毒性。它能够识别具有选择性抗侵袭作用的化合物并评估免疫治疗疗效,为临床前癌症研究提供了一种多功能工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Co-culture is an essential in vitro technique for evaluating cancer invasion and immunotherapy efficacy, as tumor-stroma and tumor-immune interactions critically influence cancer progression and therapeutic response. Conventional assays, such as Transwell-based migration or invasion systems, are limited because they cannot simultaneously quantify cell invasion and viability, reducing physiological relevance. To address this, we developed a double-pillar co-culture (DPC) platform enabling high-throughput screening while culturing two distinct cell types in a spatially defined 3D architecture. Cancer cells embedded in Matrigel are seeded onto a central pillar to form a 3D tumor-like spot, while stromal cells, including fibroblasts or immune cells, are embedded in Matrigel on an outer, slightly lower pillar surrounding the core. This configuration allows direct visualization of invasion from the central mass and concurrent monitoring of cell viability. Methods : A549 lung cancer cells and stromal cells (fibroblasts or lymphocytes) were co-cultured using the DPC platform. For drug screening, compounds including immune checkpoint-targeting drugs were applied to assess their effects on invasion and viability. To evaluate immune cytotoxicity, A549 cells were stabilized in the central pillar for three days, followed by addition of Jurkat cells to the outer pillar at a 1:5 ratio and co-cultured for an extended period. Invasion and viability were quantified using live-cell imaging and fluorescence-based assays and compared to monoculture or vehicle-treated controls. Results: Co-culture of A549 cells with fibroblasts increased invasion over time. High-throughput screening using multiple compounds showed inhibitory effects on cancer cell invasion. Among them, the EGFR inhibitor Dacomitinib reduced invasion by <40% while maintaining >95% viability, demonstrating anti-invasive activity independent of cytotoxicity. Co-culture with Jurkat cells decreased cancer cell viability by ~55% compared to monoculture, confirming significant immune-mediated cytotoxicity. Conclusions: The DPC platform provides a physiologically relevant, high-throughput system for simultaneous assessment of cancer invasion and immune cytotoxicity. It enables identification of compounds with selective anti-invasive effects and evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy, offering a versatile tool for preclinical cancer research.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Kim, None.. S. Chang, None.. S. Lee, None.. S. Kim, None.. B. Ku, None.. D. Lee, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索