PO.BCS01.08 · 生物信息与计算

初治原发性前列腺癌病例中雄激素受体非依赖表型的识别与表型评估

Identification and phenotypical evaluation of androgen receptor indifferent phenotype in treatment-naïve primary prostate cancer cases

海报缩略图:初治原发性前列腺癌病例中雄激素受体非依赖表型的识别与表型评估
编号 4152 展板 2 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 3 主讲 Tessa Tolson
分会场 Digital Pathology 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tessa Tolson1, Beatrice Knudsen2, Wei Zhang3, Mason Hovinga2, Chance Walker2, Galaxy Yang4, Erika Egal3, Yosep Chong5, Michael Freeman4, Yi Qiao1

1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,2Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,3Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT,4Cedars Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA,5The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Uijeongbu, Korea, Republic of

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:高级别、局部晚期原发性前列腺癌(PC)具有更高的转移进展风险。雄激素受体非依赖(ARi)表型的特征是尽管AR高表达但PSA表达低,此表型已在CRPC中被观察到,并被认为是由治疗诱导产生的。我们试图在原发性、初治PC病例中寻找ARi的证据。 方法:我们对一个包含27例患者的局部晚期PC患者队列应用数字病理学和多重、单细胞分辨率组织染色技术,并对TCGA前列腺癌数据集(TCGA-PRAD)进行计算RNA表达分析。因此,我们首先定量测定细胞中AR和PSA蛋白的表达水平,然后将AR+细胞>30%且PSA+细胞<30%的组织区域鉴定为ARi病例。我们分析的PC区域包括精囊侵犯(SV)、淋巴结转移(LN)、包膜外侵犯(ECE)、神经周围侵犯(PNI)、筛状(CRIB)和非筛状(HGNC)。对于TCGA批量RNA测序数据的计算分析,我们根据高AR/低PSA(ARi队列)和高AR/高PSA(AR应答型,即ARr队列)对患者进行分层,并相应地进行差异表达和基因集富集分析。 结果:在病理学上,我们在27例患者中的5例的一个或多个组织样本中鉴定出ARi表型。ARi在LN中比在SV中更常见;在前列腺内,HGNC比CRIB表现出更多的ARi。对TCGA-PRAD队列(n=500)的计算分析显示,与AR应答型患者相比,ARi患者在上皮-间质转化(EMT)、干细胞样和ONECUT2诱导的基因特征上富集。此外,我们证明ARi表型与前列腺癌亚型1(PCS1)和PAM50 Basal亚型密切相关,这与该疾病的侵袭性相一致。 结论:我们利用单细胞分辨率组织染色和批量RNA表达计算分析,在两个原发性PC患者队列中鉴定出ARi表型。我们进一步利用已发表的基因特征对该表型进行了表征,并确定了其与PCS和PAM50亚型的关系。此外,我们提出,可通过临床免疫组化使用AR和PSA抗体,随后对阳性ARi细胞(定义为高AR:PSA比值)进行定量,从而快速评估ARi表型的存在。展望未来,我们将对进行了组织染色的队列开展单细胞RNA表达分析,以进一步验证ARi表型在原发性PC中的存在和行为,扩展至其他队列,并根据其转录组表型评估可能在这些细胞中引发应答的治疗策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
INTRODUCTION: High-grade, locally advanced primary prostate cancer (PC) carries an increased risk of metastatic progression. The Androgen Receptor indifferent (ARi) phenotype is characterized by low PSA expression despite high expression of AR and has been noted in CRPC where it is considered to be induced by treatment. We sought to examine primary, treatment-naïve PC cases for evidence of ARi. METHODS: We applied digital pathology and multiplexed, single-cell resolution tissue staining techniques to a locally advanced PC patient cohort with 27 patients and computational RNA expression analysis to the TCGA prostate cancer dataset (TCGA-PRAD). Thus, we first quantify AR and PSA protein expression levels in cells and then identify tissue regions with >30% AR+ cells and <30% PSA+ cells as ARi cases. The PC regions we analyzed include seminal vesicle invasion (SV), lymph node metastasis (LN), extracapsular extension (ECE), perineural invasion (PNI), cribriform (CRIB), and non-cribriform (HGNC). For computational analysis of the TCGA bulk RNA sequencing data, we stratify patients according to high AR / low PSA (ARi-cohort) and high AR / high PSA (AR responsive, or ARr-cohort) and perform differential expression and gene set enrichment analysis accordingly. RESULTS: Pathologically, we identified ARi phenotype in one or more tissue samples from 5 out of 27 patients. ARi is more frequent in LN compared to SV; and within the prostate, HGNC exhibited more ARi than CRIB. Computational analysis of the TCGA-PRAD cohort (n=500) revealed that ARi patients, compared to AR-responsive patients, are enriched in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), stem-like, and ONECUT2-induced gene signatures. Moreover, we demonstrate that ARi phenotype is strongly associated with the Prostate Cancer Subtype 1 (PCS1) and PAM50 Basal subtype, consistent with the aggressiveness of the disease. CONCLUSION: We identified the ARi phenotype in two cohorts of primary PC patients using both tissue staining with single cell resolution and computational analysis of bulk RNA expression. We further characterized this phenotype using published gene signatures and determined its relationship to PCS and PAM50 subtypes. Furthermore, we propose that the presence of the ARi phenotype can be assessed quickly by clinical immunohistochemistry with AR and PSA antibodies followed by quantification of positive ARi cells (as defined by a high AR:PSA ratio). Moving forward, we will perform single cell RNA expression analysis on the cohort we performed tissue staining to further validate the presence and behavior of ARi phenotype in primary PC, expand into other cohorts, as well as evaluate treatment strategies likely to elicit a response in these cells according to their transcriptomic phenotypes.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Tolson, None.. B. Knudsen, None.. W. Zhang, None.. M. Hovinga, None.. C. Walker, None.. G. Yang, None.. E. Egal, None.. Y. Chong, None.. M. Freeman, None.. Y. Qiao, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索