PO.BCS01.08 · 生物信息与计算
细胞系作为IHC染色样本定量连续评分(QCS)的质量对照
Cell lines as quality controls for Quantitative Continuous Scoring (QCS) of IHC stained samples
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:有效测量治疗靶点表达对于肿瘤学中精确、准确的患者筛选至关重要。靶点表达通常通过免疫组化(IHC)使用视觉病理评分来测量;然而,基于数字病理学的定量连续评分(QCS)已成为一种更精确、更准确的替代方法1。鉴于IHC检测和全切片图像(WSI)扫描仪存在已知的变异性,我们设计了一项概念验证研究,以评估使用细胞系作为IHC染色样本QCS评分质量对照的适用性。
方法:选择了一组细胞系(N=10)以代表广泛的靶点表达范围,并将其作为细胞团块培养成福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)细胞微阵列(CMA),用于下游QCS的IHC分析。将CMA切片(4 μm)并按照标准方案用靶点抗体染色。染色后的切片以40倍扫描,图像使用经训练的基于QCS深度学习的QCS模型进行分析,该模型量化膜染色强度(SI)。
结果:细胞系对照在整个CMA块(n=40个切片)中显示出高度一致的QCS染色强度(SI)评分。同一天进行的三次重复的SI相互比较或跨天比较,每个细胞系的变异系数(CV)<10%,证明了在整个细胞系团块中具有高水平的精确度和可重复性。此外,细胞密度在整个FFPE块中也是一致的。而且,我们观察到QCS SI与质谱结果之间高度显著的相关性(R=0.98),从而证明了在细胞系中评估靶点表达的特异性。最后,人为引入检测变异性的早期实验表明,细胞系能够追踪在组织中观察到的32%人为变异性,并将该变异性校正至7%,从而支持使用细胞系来潜在地改善IHC/QCS的精确度和可重复性。
结论:这些数据支持了使用细胞系作为IHC染色样本QCS评分定性对照的可行性。鉴于表达异质性不像在组织中那样是一个显著因素,细胞系在整个块中提供一致的表达,具有高度的精确度和可重复性。因此,这些数据支持了将细胞系对照整合到实验室环境中基于QCS的IHC测量的质量保证流程的潜力。此外,细胞系质量对照还可用于桥接和可比性,从而实现QCS检测的高效、稳健开发。1 Kapil等。“用于HER2阴性经曲妥珠单抗德鲁替康治疗的乳腺癌中准确患者筛选的HER2定量连续评分”。Nature Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12129。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Effectively measuring therapeutic target expression is critical in oncology for precise and accurate patient selection. Target expression is often measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using visual pathology scoring; however, digital pathology-based Quantitative Continuous Scoring (QCS) has emerged as a more precise and accurate alternative 1 . Given that IHC assays and whole slide image (WSI) scanners have known variability, we designed a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the applicability of using cell lines as quality controls for QCS scoring of IHC stained samples.
Methods: A panel of cell lines (N=10) were selected to represent a broad range of target expression and cultured as cell pellets into a Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Cell Micro Array (CMA) for downstream IHC analysis with QCS. The CMA was sectioned (4 µm) and stained with a target antibody according to standard protocols. The stained slides were scanned at 40x, and images were analyzed using a trained QCS deep-learning based QCS model that quantifies membrane staining intensity (SI).
Results: Cell line controls showed highly consistent QCS staining intensity (SI) scores through the entire CMA block (n=40 sections). SI from triplicates run on the same day were compared among each other or across days with a coefficient of variation (CV) <10% for each cell line, demonstrating a high level of precision and reproducibility through the entire cell line pellet. Additionally, cell density was also consistent throughout the FFPE block. Moreover, we observed highly significant correlation (R=0.98) between QCS SI and mass-spectrometry results, thus demonstrating specificity for assessing target expression in cell lines. Finally, early experiments with contrived assay variability showed the ability of cell lines to track the 32% contrived variability observed in tissue and correct that variability to 7%, thus supporting the use of cell lines to potentially improve IHC/QCS precision and reproducibility.
Conclusion: These data support the feasibility of using cell lines as qualitative controls for QCS scoring of IHC stained samples. Given that heterogeneity of expression is not a significant factor like it is in tissue, cell lines provide consistent expression throughout the entire block with a high degree of precision and reproducibility. These data thus support the potential for integrating cell line controls into the quality assurance pipeline for QCS-based IHC measurements in the laboratory setting. Further, cell line quality controls could also be used for bridging and comparability, thus enabling efficient and robust development of QCS assays. 1 Kapil et al. “HER2 quantitative continuous scoring for accurate patient selection in HER2 negative trastuzumab deruxtecan treated breast cancer”. Nature Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12129.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Hidalgo-Sastre,
AstraZeneca Employment, Stock.
N. Harder,
AstraZeneca Employment.
S. Varriano,
AstraZeneca Employment.
A. Kunihiro,
AstraZeneca Employment.
M. Gustavson,
AstraZeneca Employment, Stock.