PO.BCS01.08 · 生物信息与计算

细胞系作为IHC染色样本定量连续评分(QCS)的质量对照

Cell lines as quality controls for Quantitative Continuous Scoring (QCS) of IHC stained samples

海报缩略图:细胞系作为IHC染色样本定量连续评分(QCS)的质量对照
编号 4158 展板 8 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 3 主讲 Mark Gustavson, PhD
分会场 Digital Pathology 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ana Hidalgo-Sastre1, Tze Heng Tan1, Nicolas Giraldo2, Nathalie Harder1, Sophia Varriano3, Andrew Kunihiro3, Guenter Schmidt1, Hadassah Sade1, Yeoun Jin Kim3, Marlon Rebelatto3, Mark Gustavson3

1AstraZeneca, Munich, Germany,2AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain,3AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:有效测量治疗靶点表达对于肿瘤学中精确、准确的患者筛选至关重要。靶点表达通常通过免疫组化(IHC)使用视觉病理评分来测量;然而,基于数字病理学的定量连续评分(QCS)已成为一种更精确、更准确的替代方法1。鉴于IHC检测和全切片图像(WSI)扫描仪存在已知的变异性,我们设计了一项概念验证研究,以评估使用细胞系作为IHC染色样本QCS评分质量对照的适用性。 方法:选择了一组细胞系(N=10)以代表广泛的靶点表达范围,并将其作为细胞团块培养成福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)细胞微阵列(CMA),用于下游QCS的IHC分析。将CMA切片(4 μm)并按照标准方案用靶点抗体染色。染色后的切片以40倍扫描,图像使用经训练的基于QCS深度学习的QCS模型进行分析,该模型量化膜染色强度(SI)。 结果:细胞系对照在整个CMA块(n=40个切片)中显示出高度一致的QCS染色强度(SI)评分。同一天进行的三次重复的SI相互比较或跨天比较,每个细胞系的变异系数(CV)<10%,证明了在整个细胞系团块中具有高水平的精确度和可重复性。此外,细胞密度在整个FFPE块中也是一致的。而且,我们观察到QCS SI与质谱结果之间高度显著的相关性(R=0.98),从而证明了在细胞系中评估靶点表达的特异性。最后,人为引入检测变异性的早期实验表明,细胞系能够追踪在组织中观察到的32%人为变异性,并将该变异性校正至7%,从而支持使用细胞系来潜在地改善IHC/QCS的精确度和可重复性。 结论:这些数据支持了使用细胞系作为IHC染色样本QCS评分定性对照的可行性。鉴于表达异质性不像在组织中那样是一个显著因素,细胞系在整个块中提供一致的表达,具有高度的精确度和可重复性。因此,这些数据支持了将细胞系对照整合到实验室环境中基于QCS的IHC测量的质量保证流程的潜力。此外,细胞系质量对照还可用于桥接和可比性,从而实现QCS检测的高效、稳健开发。1 Kapil等。“用于HER2阴性经曲妥珠单抗德鲁替康治疗的乳腺癌中准确患者筛选的HER2定量连续评分”。Nature Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12129。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Effectively measuring therapeutic target expression is critical in oncology for precise and accurate patient selection. Target expression is often measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using visual pathology scoring; however, digital pathology-based Quantitative Continuous Scoring (QCS) has emerged as a more precise and accurate alternative 1 . Given that IHC assays and whole slide image (WSI) scanners have known variability, we designed a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the applicability of using cell lines as quality controls for QCS scoring of IHC stained samples. Methods: A panel of cell lines (N=10) were selected to represent a broad range of target expression and cultured as cell pellets into a Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) Cell Micro Array (CMA) for downstream IHC analysis with QCS. The CMA was sectioned (4 µm) and stained with a target antibody according to standard protocols. The stained slides were scanned at 40x, and images were analyzed using a trained QCS deep-learning based QCS model that quantifies membrane staining intensity (SI). Results: Cell line controls showed highly consistent QCS staining intensity (SI) scores through the entire CMA block (n=40 sections). SI from triplicates run on the same day were compared among each other or across days with a coefficient of variation (CV) <10% for each cell line, demonstrating a high level of precision and reproducibility through the entire cell line pellet. Additionally, cell density was also consistent throughout the FFPE block. Moreover, we observed highly significant correlation (R=0.98) between QCS SI and mass-spectrometry results, thus demonstrating specificity for assessing target expression in cell lines. Finally, early experiments with contrived assay variability showed the ability of cell lines to track the 32% contrived variability observed in tissue and correct that variability to 7%, thus supporting the use of cell lines to potentially improve IHC/QCS precision and reproducibility. Conclusion: These data support the feasibility of using cell lines as qualitative controls for QCS scoring of IHC stained samples. Given that heterogeneity of expression is not a significant factor like it is in tissue, cell lines provide consistent expression throughout the entire block with a high degree of precision and reproducibility. These data thus support the potential for integrating cell line controls into the quality assurance pipeline for QCS-based IHC measurements in the laboratory setting. Further, cell line quality controls could also be used for bridging and comparability, thus enabling efficient and robust development of QCS assays. 1 Kapil et al. “HER2 quantitative continuous scoring for accurate patient selection in HER2 negative trastuzumab deruxtecan treated breast cancer”. Nature Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12129.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Hidalgo-Sastre, AstraZeneca Employment, Stock. N. Harder, AstraZeneca Employment. S. Varriano, AstraZeneca Employment. A. Kunihiro, AstraZeneca Employment. M. Gustavson, AstraZeneca Employment, Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索