PO.BCS02.06 · 生物信息与计算

AI based explainable survival modeling for advanced non small cell lung cancer

海报缩略图:AI based explainable survival modeling for advanced non small cell lung cancer
编号 4229 展板 25 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 5 主讲 Kang Qin, MD;MS
分会场 Machine Learning Approaches for Cancer Prediction
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Kang Qin1, An Qin2, John V. Heymach1

1MD Anderson cancer center, Houston, TX,2Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL

摘要 Abstract

Background: Accurate individualized prognostication in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is hindered by nonlinear interactions among clinical and biological variables. Integrating interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) with classical survival modeling may enhance predictive precision while preserving transparency. Methods: A real-world cohort of 62 608 advanced NSCLC patients with 52782 observed death events was analyzed. Prognostic variables significantly associated with overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate Cox proportional-hazards regression (p < 0.05). Feature refinement was achieved through LASSO-regularized Cox modeling with 5-fold cross-validation (λ = 0.00176) and stability selection (≥ 0.7), producing a 20-feature prognostic signature. These variables were then used to train and benchmark 18 regression and ensemble machine-learning algorithms for continuous OS prediction. Model performance was evaluated using R², RMSE, MAE, calibration plots, and decision-curve analysis (DCA). Feature interpretability was assessed with SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) to quantify the direction and magnitude of each predictor's effect. Results: All 20 variables remained significant in multivariate Cox analysis. Chemotherapy, systemic therapy, and surgery were independent protective factors, whereas age, tumor size, metastatic burden, liver/bone metastasis, regional nodal involvement, and N stage predicted worse outcomes. Ensemble gradient-boosting models outperformed linear baselines (R² ≈ 0.15 vs. 0.10; RMSE ≈ 18 months). LightGBM achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.155; MAE = 11.9 months) with excellent calibration and the greatest net benefit on DCA. SHAP analysis identified chemotherapy, diagnosis year, organ metastatic number, and age as dominant determinants of predicted survival, with strong reproducibility across folds (Spearman ρ > 0.9). Conclusions: A transparent Cox-LASSO-LightGBM-SHAP framework established a robust, biologically consistent 20-factor prognostic signature for advanced NSCLC. The model achieved high predictive accuracy, clinical calibration, and interpretability, revealing treatment modality, metastatic extent, and temporal therapeutic progress as principal survival drivers. This interpretable AI framework enables credible, individualized survival prediction and bridges data-driven modeling with clinical oncology.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Qin, None.. A. Qin, None.. J. V. Heymach, None.

在会议检索中打开