PO.CL01.17 · 临床研究

根治性治疗后非小细胞肺癌中肿瘤知情循环肿瘤DNA的预后价值:具有长期随访的真实世界队列

Prognostic value of tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer after curative treatment: real-world cohort with long-term follow-up

海报缩略图:根治性治疗后非小细胞肺癌中肿瘤知情循环肿瘤DNA的预后价值:具有长期随访的真实世界队列
编号 5366 展板 4 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 47 主讲 Sanghwa Kim, MD
分会场 Prognostic Biomarkers 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Soyun Lim1, Jisoo Lee1, Julianne Jin1, Anthony Wong1, Youjin Oh1, Sung Mi Yoon1, Jeeyeon Lee2, Joo Hee Park1, Soowon Lee1, Timothy Hong1, Bella Kim1, Sanghwa Kim1, Liam Il-Young Chung1, Young Kwang Chae3

1Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL,2Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Republic of,3Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)是一种用于检测分子残留病灶(MRD)和预测癌症患者复发的生物标志物。我们的团队此前报道了首个基于ctDNA的MRD检测真实世界数据。我们现在通过延长随访,在接受根治性意图治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的真实世界队列中研究其长期预后价值。 方法:使用市售的个性化、肿瘤知情检测(Signatera)对116例NSCLC患者进行纵向ctDNA监测。在治疗后采集血浆样本,在6个月MRD窗口内评估ctDNA状态,此后进行纵向评估。根据ctDNA状态评估无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。对于ctDNA(+)患者,在有条件时于MRD时间点进行基于血浆的下一代测序(NGS;Guardant360),并与基线组织NGS结果(PGDx或Tempus xT)进行比较。 结果:共识别出116例I-IV期患者(I期:41.4%,II期:30.2%,III期:21.6%,IV期:6.9%)(90例腺癌,23例鳞状细胞癌,2例腺鳞癌,1例其他)。诊断时中位年龄为66岁(范围:23-86岁),中位随访时间为33个月(范围:4-120个月)。99例患者在根治性意图治疗后6个月内获得了MRD结果。在6个月MRD窗口内,ctDNA(+)与较差的RFS相关(aHR:24.3;95% CI:3.2-186.8;p < 0.001),中位RFS为8.5个月。MRD窗口之外的纵向监测期间ctDNA(+)与较差的RFS(HR:8.0,95% CI:3.4-18.9;p < 0.001)和OS(HR:11.6,95% CI:3.4-39.8;p < 0.001)相关,中位RFS为10.8个月。在同时具有组织NGS(tNGS)和血液NGS(bNGS)检测结果的患者中,8例为ctDNA(+)。其中,5例患者在tNGS和bNGS之间存在至少一个变异水平上重叠的基因突变。这5例患者全部复发,而其他3例(在变异水平上无重叠基因突变)未复发。匹配组主要由III期病例组成(5例中的4例),另有1例II期,而非匹配组包括I期、II期和IV期各1例。 结论:这份具有延长随访的首个真实世界报告提供了真实世界证据,表明肿瘤知情、个性化ctDNA监测是预测NSCLC患者根治性意图治疗后长期结局的临床有价值工具。尽管解释受限于小样本量,ctDNA(+)时的血液NGS可能反映潜在的亚克隆演化和分子异质性。这些发现支持ctDNA的预后价值及其整合到个性化癌症管理中的潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a biomarker for detecting molecular residual disease (MRD) and predicting recurrence in cancer patients. Our group previously reported the first real-world data of ctDNA-based MRD detection. We now investigate its long-term prognostic value with extended follow-up in the real-world cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with curative-intent. Methods: Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring was performed using a commercially available personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera) in 116 patients with NSCLC. Plasma samples were collected post-treatment, and ctDNA status was evaluated within the 6-month MRD window, and longitudinally thereafter. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to ctDNA status. For ctDNA(+) patients, plasma-based next-generation sequencing (NGS; Guardant360) at MRD timepoint was performed when available and compared with baseline tissue NGS results (PGDx or Tempus xT). Results: A total of 116 patients across stages I-IV (stage I: 41.4%, stage II: 30.2%, stage III: 21.6%, and stage IV: 6.9%) were identified (90 adenocarcinoma, 23 squamous cell carcinoma, 2 adenosquamous and 1 other). Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range: 23-86 years) and median follow-up was 33 months (range: 4-120 months). MRD results were available for 99 patients within 6 months of curative-intent treatment. Within the 6-month MRD window, ctDNA(+) was associated with inferior RFS (aHR: 24.3; 95% CI: 3.2-186.8; p < 0.001), with a median RFS of 8.5 months. ctDNA(+) during longitudinal surveillance beyond MRD window was associated with inferior RFS (HR: 8.0, 95% CI: 3.4-18.9; p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 11.6, 95% CI: 3.4-39.8; p < 0.001), with median RFS of 10.8 months. Among patients with both tissue NGS (tNGS) and blood NGS (bNGS) profiling results, 8 patients were ctDNA(+). Among them, 5 patients had at least one overlapping gene mutation at the variant level between tNGS and bNGS. All 5 of these patients recurred, while the other 3 patients (who did not have an overlapping gene mutation at the variant level) did not recur. The matched group consisted mostly of stage III cases (4 of 5), with one stage II, whereas the unmatched group included one each of stage I, II and IV cases. Conclusion: This first real-world report with extended follow-up provides real-world evidence that tumor-informed, personalized ctDNA monitoring is a clinically valuable tool for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with NSCLC after curative-intent treatment. Although interpretation is limited by the small sample size, blood NGS at ctDNA(+) may reflect potential subclonal evolution and molecular heterogeneity. These findings support the prognostic value of ctDNA and its potential integration into personalized cancer management.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Lim, None.. J. Lee, None.. J. Jin, None.. A. Wong, None.. Y. Oh, None.. S. Yoon, None.. J. Park, None.. S. Lee, None.. T. Hong, None.. B. Kim, None.. S. Kim, None.. L. I. Chung, None. Y. Chae, AbbVie ). Bristol Myers Squibb ), Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Biodesix ), Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Freenome ). Predicine ). Picture Health ). Roche/Genentech Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. AstraZeneca Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Foundation Medicine Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Neogenomics Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Guardant Health Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Boehringer Ingelheim Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Regeneron Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. ImmuneOncia Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Lilly Oncology Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Merck Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Takeda Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Lunit Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria. Tempus, Neoimmune Tech, Eisai, and Novocure Other, Consulting fees, payments, and/or honoraria.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索