PO.CL01.17 · 临床研究

治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在多种族乳腺癌患者队列中的预后作用

The prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in a multiethnic cohort of breast cancer patients

海报缩略图:治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在多种族乳腺癌患者队列中的预后作用
编号 5368 展板 6 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 47 主讲 Armaan Jamal, BS
分会场 Prognostic Biomarkers 3
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Armaan Jamal1, Lendy Chu2, Jincong Q. Freeman1, Rita Nanda3, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade3, Wenji Guo3, Dezheng Huo1

1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,2Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,3Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)是全身性炎症的标志物,与包括乳腺癌在内的多种实体肿瘤恶性肿瘤的不良结局相关。既往研究表明其在乳腺癌中的预后意义因分子亚型而异;然而,这些研究很少考虑基线NLR值的种族差异,而这可能影响基于阈值分析的解释。本研究评估治疗前NLR在乳腺癌中的预后价值,以及NLR与生存结局之间的关联是否因种族和肿瘤亚型而异。 方法:我们对来自芝加哥多种族乳腺癌流行病学队列的754例患者进行了回顾性分析。符合条件的患者在治疗开始前≤1年有NLR测量值。NLR作为连续变量和二分变量进行分析,使用全队列中位截断值(2.07)和种族特异性截断值(白人患者3.11,黑人患者2.56)。结局包括无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)、乳腺癌特异性生存期(BCSS)和其他原因(OC)死亡率。使用Cox和竞争风险回归模型估计NLR与生存结局之间的关联,并对人口统计学和临床协变量进行校正。 结果:在754例患者中(诊断时平均年龄55.9岁),383例为黑人,308例为白人,63例被归为其他。黑人患者的治疗前中位NLR较低(1.78,IQR 1.30-2.61),而白人为(2.38,IQR 1.69-3.11),其他种族患者为(2.06,IQR 1.41-2.89)。在校正分析中,NLR每翻倍与更差的RFS(校正风险比[aHR] 1.24,95% CI 1.02-1.52)、OS(aHR 1.20,95% CI 0.98-1.48)和OC死亡率(aSHR 1.42,95% CI 1.07-1.89)相关。当作为二分变量建模时,高NLR(≥2.07)仅与更高的OC死亡率相关(校正亚分布风险比[aSHR] 2.11,95% CI 1.11-4.02)。分层分析显示,NLR与生存结局之间的关联在HER2阴性和激素受体阳性肿瘤中最为显著,而在激素受体阴性肿瘤中未观察到显著关联。使用种族特异性阈值时,高NLR(≥2.56)在黑人患者中与更差的RFS(aHR 2.02,95% CI 1.27-3.21)、OS(aHR 1.93,95% CI 1.15-3.21)和BCSS(aSHR 2.31,95% CI 1.12-4.78)显著相关,但在白人患者中则不然。 结论:我们的研究表明,治疗前NLR可用作乳腺癌结局的预后标志物,但其预测价值因种族和肿瘤亚型而异。NLR的基线种族差异凸显了对种族特异性阈值的需求。需要更大规模、更多样化的研究来验证这些发现并阐明潜在的生物学机制。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker of systemic inflammation linked to poor outcomes in several solid tumor malignancies, including breast cancer. Prior studies have shown that its prognostic significance in breast cancer differs by molecular subtype; however, these studies have rarely accounted for racial variation in baseline NLR values, which may affect the interpretation of threshold-based analyses. This study evaluates the prognostic value of pretreatment NLR in breast cancer and whether associations between NLR and survival outcomes differ by race and tumor subtype. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 754 patients from the Chicago Multiethnic Epidemiologic Breast Cancer Cohort. Eligible patients had an NLR measurement ≤1 year prior to treatment initiation. NLR was analyzed as both continuous and binary variables, using a cohort-wide median cutoff (2.07) and race-specific cutoffs (3.11 for White and 2.56 for Black patients). Outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and other-cause (OC) mortality. Cox and competing risk regression models were used to estimate the associations between NLR and survival outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: Among 754 patients (mean age at diagnosis 55.9 years), 383 were Black, 308 were White, and 63 were categorized as Other. The median pretreatment NLR was lower in Black patients (1.78, IQR 1.30-2.61) compared to White (2.38, IQR 1.69-3.11) and Other racial patients (2.06, IQR 1.41-2.89). In adjusted analyses, each doubling of NLR was associated with worse RFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.52), OS (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 0.98-1.48), and OC mortality (aSHR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.89). When modeled as a binary variable, high NLR (≥2.07) was associated only with higher OC mortality (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 2.11, 95% CI 1.11-4.02). Stratified analyses showed that the association between NLR and survival outcomes was most pronounced in HER2-negative and hormone receptor-positive tumors, whereas no significant associations were observed in hormone receptor-negative tumors. When using race-specific thresholds, high NLR (≥2.56) was significantly associated with worse RFS (aHR 2.02, 95% CI 1.27-3.21), OS (aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.15-3.21), and BCSS (aSHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.12-4.78) in Black patients, but not in White patients. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that pretreatment NLR may be used as a prognostic marker for breast cancer outcomes, but its predictive value varies by race and tumor subtype. Baseline racial differences in NLR underscore the need for race-specific thresholds. Larger, diverse studies are needed to validate these findings and clarify underlying biological mechanisms.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Jamal, None.. L. Chu, None.. J. Q. Freeman, None.. R. Nanda, None.. O. I. Olopade, None.. W. Guo, None.. D. Huo, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索