PO.ET01.03 · 实验与分子治疗
高级别神经内分泌癌的肿瘤细胞表面靶向治疗
Tumor cell surface targeting of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
高级别神经内分泌癌(hgNECs)是侵袭性恶性肿瘤,最常起源于消化道和呼吸道,但也偶尔起源于其他部位。令人沮丧的是,hgNECs最初对化疗和/或放疗极为敏感,但这些疗效持续时间短暂,且不可避免地会发生复发。近期的治疗进展聚焦于hgNEC相关的细胞表面抗原,当用抗体靶向这些抗原时,它们可作为向肿瘤递送细胞毒性或免疫性有效载荷的信标。针对hgNEC抗原(包括DLL3和SEZ6)的T细胞衔接器(TCEs)和/或抗体偶联药物(ADCs)在复发性hgNECs中显示出前所未有的疗效。在某些情况下,例如小细胞肺癌(SCLC),这些抗原的表达几乎无处不在,对表面靶向治疗的敏感性主要取决于有效载荷。然而,在其他hgNECs中,神经内分泌(NE)特征(包括DLL3和SEZ6表达)呈双峰分布,这就需要制定患者选择策略,并为NE低表达的hgNECs寻找替代抗原。在MDACC,已通过CLIA验证的免疫组化方法对超过340例患者(包括被诊断为罕见肺外hgNECs者,即Merkel细胞癌、乳腺小细胞癌、甲状腺小细胞癌等)的DLL3水平进行了评估,以便超适应症使用tarlatamab(一种DLL3靶向TCE)。我们利用来自公共hgNEC队列以及我们自己的患者和临床前模型队列的表达数据,来表征已知细胞表面靶点表达(即DLL3等)、各种已确立的生物标志物(包括NE状态和SLFN11)与对表面靶向治疗敏感性之间的关系。NE状态界定了hgNECs的两个主要亚群。NE高表达标本表达高水平的DLL3和SEZ6,并对靶向这些抗原的治疗有反应。相比之下,NE低表达亚群表达高水平的TROP2和HER2。令人惊讶的是,靶点表达并非ADCs靶向这些抗原时的主要预测性生物标志物;相反,有效载荷敏感性的生物标志物(例如针对拓扑异构酶I抑制剂有效载荷的SLFN11,P=0.01)对疗效提供了更优的洞见。表面靶向治疗代表了hgNEC治疗的新范式,尽管DLL3和SEZ6靶向治疗在所有hgNECs中都显示出前景,但如果不进行患者选择,其在SCLC以外的影响将受到限制。利用生物标志物(包括靶点表达、炎症潜能和有效载荷敏感性的生物标志物),对于优化这些恶性肿瘤患者的药物选择将至关重要。
查看英文原文 English abstract
High-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (hgNECs) are aggressive malignancies that arise, most commonly, from the aerodigestive tracts, though, more rarely from other sites. Frustratingly, hgNECs are, initially, exquisitely sensitive to chemotherapy and/or radiation, but these responses are short-lived and inevitable relapses occur. Recent therapeutic developments have focused on hgNEC-associated cell surface antigens which, when targeted with an antibody, can serve as beacons for delivery of cytotoxic or immunologic payloads. T-cell engagers (TCEs) and/or antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) against hgNEC antigens, including DLL3 and SEZ6, have demonstrated unprecedented responses in relapsed hgNECs. In some cases, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC), the expression of these antigens is nearly ubiquitous and sensitivity to surface-targeting therapies is contingent primarily on payload. However, in other hgNECs, neuroendocrine (NE) features, including DLL3 and SEZ6 expression, are bimodal, which necessitates strategies for patient selection and alternative antigens for NE-low hgNECs. DLL3 levels have been evaluated by CLIA-validated immunohistochemistry in >340 patients at MDACC, including those diagnosed with rare extrapulmonary hgNECs (i.e., Merkel cell carcinoma, small cell of the breast, thyroid, etc.) for off-label use of tarlatamab (DLL3-targeting TCE). We utilized expression data from public hgNEC cohorts, as well as our own patient and preclinical model cohorts to characterize the relationship between known cell surface target expression (i.e., DLL3, etc.), various established biomarkers, including NE status and SLFN11, and sensitivity to surface targeting therapies. NE status defined two major subsets of hgNECs. NE-high specimens expressed high DLL3 and SEZ6 and were responsive to therapies targeting these antigens. In contrast, the NE-low subsets expressed high TROP2 and HER2. Surprisingly, target expression was not the dominant predictive biomarker for ADCs targeting these antigens as, instead, biomarkers of payload sensitivity (e.g. SLFN11 for topoisomerase I inhibitor payloads, P=0.01) offered superior insight into efficacy. Surface-targeting therapies represent a new paradigm for hgNEC therapeutics and while DLL3- and SEZ6-targeting therapies are showing promise across all hgNECs, their impact will be limited outside SCLC without patient selection. Utilizing biomarkers, including those for target expression, inflammatory potential, and payload sensitivity, will be critical to optimize drug selection for patients with these malignancies.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Stewart, None..
K. Ramkumar, None..
A. Tanimoto, None..
R. Wang, None..
A. Duarte, None..
A. Chen, None..
A. Serrano, None..
Y. Xi, None..
L. Diao, None..
Q. Wang, None..
L. Shen, None..
A. Halliday, None..
S. So, None..
L. Solis Soto, None..
J. Wang, None.
B. Zhang,
Abdera Independent Contractor.
Daiichi Sankyo Independent Contractor.
OncoHost Independent Contractor.
Ideology Health Travel.
L. A. Byers,
AstraZeneca Independent Contractor, ).
Amgen Independent Contractor, ).
Circle Pharma ).
Bristol Meyers Squibb ).
Abbvie Independent Contractor.
Boehringer Ingelheim Independent Contractor.
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Independent Contractor.
Daiichi Sankyo Independent Contractor.
Genentech Independent Contractor.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Independent Contractor.
Novartis Independent Contractor.
Puma Biotechnology Independent Contractor.
C. M. Gay,
Abdera Independent Contractor.
Amgen Independent Contractor.
AstraZeneca Independent Contractor.
BeOne Independent Contractor.
BioNTech Independent Contractor.
Boehringer Ingelheim Independent Contractor.
Daiichi Sankyo Independent Contractor.
G1 Therapeutics Independent Contractor.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Independent Contractor.
Merck Independent Contractor.
OncoHost Independent Contractor.
Roche/Genentech Independent Contractor.