PO.MCB09.05 · 分子与细胞生物学
非小细胞肺癌与非癌症人群的代谢组学分析:一项病例对照研究
Metabolomic profiling among non-small cell lung cancer and non-cancer populations: A case-control study
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
肺癌是美国第二常见的癌症,预计2025年将有约124,730例死亡。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌病例的80-85%,是该疾病的主要类型。27.4-28.1%的NSCLC病例在早期阶段被诊断,这表明需要进行生物标志物检测,从而在单纯基于影像学方法之外提高检测的准确性。代谢组学能够全面鉴定NSCLC特异性代谢物,揭示独特的生化改变,为新型诊断生物标志物的发现提供依据,并可用于进一步研究预后和治疗靶点。因此,我们采用病例对照设计开展了一项代谢组学初步研究,以鉴定NSCLC患者与非癌症对照之间差异丰度的代谢物,目标是发现与NSCLC相关的潜在代谢组学生物标志物。本研究共纳入80例NSCLC患者(45.6%为男性;平均年龄=65.4)和40例非癌症对照个体(24.3%为男性;平均年龄=40.2)。利用与Vanquish Horizon UHPLC系统联用的Orbitrap Fusion和TSQ Altis QqQ质谱,在UF ICBR蛋白质组学与质谱中心对研究人群的血清样本进行了全局代谢组学分析。采用Mann-Whitney U检验结合Benjamini-Hochberg FDR校正及倍数变化阈值确定差异丰度代谢物。全局代谢组学分析共鉴定出5,307种代谢物,采用严格标准(FDR<0.01,FC≥4),其中626种(11.8%)在NSCLC患者与非癌症对照之间存在差异丰度。455种代谢物在NSCLC中丰度较低,171种丰度较高。PCA结果显示NSCLC患者与非癌症对照之间存在分离,PC1和PC2共解释了总方差的25%。OPLS-DA证实了NSCLC患者与非癌症对照之间代谢谱的区分。网络分析揭示了多条代谢通路的失调,包括尿素循环、TCA循环、氨基酸代谢和多胺生物合成。包括次黄嘌呤、己二酸和甜菜碱在内的关键代谢物在NSCLC中丰度显著降低。通路富集分析发现嘌呤和嘧啶代谢富集,提示NSCLC相关的核苷酸代谢改变。有必要开展更大规模的前瞻性研究,以验证这些代谢组学生物标志物在NSCLC临床应用中的价值。未来的研究将评估其在预测预后、治疗反应和生存方面的效用。将这些NSCLC特异性代谢组学特征应用于临床实践,可提高预后准确性并为个体化治疗策略提供依据,最终改善结局和生存。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the United States, with an estimated 124,730 deaths projected in 2025. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-85% of all lung cancer cases, making it the predominant form of the disease. 27.4-28.1% of NSCLC cases are diagnosed at early stages, indicating the need for biomarker testing, which enhances detection accuracy beyond imaging-based approaches alone. Metabolomics enables the comprehensive identification of NSCLC-specific metabolites, revealing distinct biochemical alterations that inform the discovery of novel diagnostic biomarkers and could be utilized to further investigate outcomes and therapeutic targets. Therefore, we conducted a pilot metabolomics study using a case-control design to identify differentially abundant metabolites between NSCLC patients and non-cancer controls, with the goal of discovering potential metabolomic biomarkers associated with NSCLC. A total of 80 NSCLC patients (45.6% male; mean age=65.4) and 40 non-cancer control individuals (24.3% male; mean age=40.2) were included in this study. Global metabolomic profiling from serum samples of the study population utilizing the Orbitrap Fusion and the TSQ Altis QqQ mass spectrometry interfaced with the Vanquish Horizon UHPLC system at the UF ICBR Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry. Differentially abundant metabolites were determined using Mann-Whitney U-tests with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction and fold-change threshold. Global metabolomic profiling identified 5,307 metabolites, of which 626 (11.8%) were differentially abundant between NSCLC patients and non-cancer controls using stringent criteria (FDR<0.01, FC≥4). 455 metabolites were less abundant, and 171 were more abundant in NSCLC. The results from PCA demonstrated a separation between NSCLC patients and non-cancer controls, with PC1 and PC2 accounting for 25% of the total variance. OPLS-DA confirmed the discrimination of metabolic profiles between NSCLC patients and non-cancer controls. Network analysis revealed dysregulation in metabolic pathways, including the urea cycle, TCA cycle, amino acid metabolism, and polyamine biosynthesis. Key metabolites, including hypoxanthine, adipic acid, and betaine, were significantly less abundant in NSCLC. Pathway enrichment analysis identified enrichment in purine and pyrimidine metabolism, suggesting altered nucleotide metabolism associated with NSCLC. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate these metabolomic biomarkers for clinical application in NSCLC. Future investigations will evaluate their utility in predicting prognosis, treatment response, and survival. The implementation of these NSCLC-specific metabolomic signatures in clinical practice could enhance prognostic accuracy and inform personalized treatment strategies, ultimately improving outcomes and survival.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Koh, None..
J. Yang, None..
M. Yoo, None..
Q. Cai, None..
F. Xiao, None..
H. Mehta, None..
L. Wu, None..
H. Yoon, None.