PO.PS01.03 · 人群科学

跨多站点学术医疗系统的癌症诊断及时性差异

Disparities in timeliness of cancer diagnosis across a multi-site academic health system

海报缩略图:跨多站点学术医疗系统的癌症诊断及时性差异
编号 5073 展板 13 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 36 主讲 Vivian Tran, BA;MPH
分会场 Etiology and Molecular Epidemiology Approaches to Decipher Cancer Disparities
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Vivian Hoang Tran1, Suraj M. Rajan1, Matthew P. Banegas1, Winta Mehtsun2, Brent Rose1, James Murphy1, Melody Schiaffino1, Joshua Demb1, Noe C. Crespo3, Humberto Parada1, Corinne McDaniels-Davidson3, Elena Martinez1

1Center for Health Equity Education & Research, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA,2UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA,3San Diego State University School of Public Health, San Diego, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:早期癌症诊断对于改善生存和生活质量至关重要。了解医疗系统内哪些患者群体处于晚期诊断的较高风险,是实现健康公平的关键一步。本研究检查了与晚期诊断相关的人口学、临床和社会经济因素,晚期诊断根据美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)标准定义为III/IV期诊断。 方法:一项对加利福尼亚大学医疗系统数据库中12,721例诊断为乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌患者的回顾性队列研究。使用多变量逻辑回归识别与晚期诊断相关的各种因素。 结果:14.1%的患者被诊断为晚期(III/IV期)。在校正分析中,与乳腺癌(参照组)相比,结直肠癌(OR:4.76;95% CI:4.12-5.50)和肺癌(OR:12.82;95% CI:11.01-14.92)患者的晚期诊断几率显著更高。较高的地区剥夺指数(ADI)与晚期诊断几率增加显著相关(每增加1个单位OR:1.03;95% CI:1.01-1.05)。在最终校正模型中,种族和族裔均不是晚期诊断的独立预测因素。 结论:癌症类型是晚期诊断的最强预测因素。此外,更大的邻里层面社会经济劣势(以ADI衡量)是一个显著的独立风险因素。这些发现强调了需要纳入地理空间分析的针对性筛查和诊断干预,特别是针对社会经济劣势社区的肺癌和结直肠癌患者。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Early cancer diagnosis is crucial for improving survival and quality of life. Understanding which patient populations are at higher risk for late-stage diagnosis within a healthcare system is a crucial step toward achieving health equity. This study examines demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors associated with late-stage diagnosis, defined as stage III/IV diagnoses using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 12,721 patients diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer within the University of California health system database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify various factors associated with late-stage diagnosis. Results: 14.1% of patients were diagnosed at a late-stage (stage III/IV). In adjusted analyses, patients with colorectal (OR: 4.76; 95% CI: 4.12-5.50) and lung cancer (OR: 12.82; 95% CI: 11.01-14.92) had significantly higher odds of late-stage diagnosis compared to breast cancer (reference group). A higher Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was significantly associated with increased odds of late-stage diagnosis (OR: 1.03 per 1-unit increase; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05). Neither race nor ethnicity was an independent predictor of late-stage diagnosis in the final adjusted model. Conclusion: Cancer type is the strongest predictor of a late-stage diagnosis. Additionally, greater neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage (measured by ADI) is a significant, independent risk factor. These findings highlight the need for targeted screening and diagnostic interventions that incorporate geospatial analyses, particularly for lung and colorectal cancer patients in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities.
利益披露 Disclosure
V. H. Tran, None.. S. M. Rajan, None.. M. P. Banegas, None.. W. Mehtsun, None.. B. Rose, None.. J. Murphy, None.. M. Schiaffino, None.. J. Demb, None.. N. C. Crespo, None.. H. Parada, None.. C. McDaniels-Davidson, None.. E. Martinez, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索