LBPO.CL03 · 临床研究 · Late-Breaking
沉默型KRAS突变改变了细胞对KRAS靶向抑制的敏感性
Silent KRAS mutations confer altered sensitivity to targeted KRAS inhibition
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
KRAS在超过90%的胰腺腺癌(PDAC)中发生突变,是最难攻克的治疗靶点之一。位于G12、G13和Q61的激活性错义突变使KRAS锁定在持续信号传导的状态,驱动PDAC的生长。同义突变(即沉默突变)由于不改变所编码的氨基酸、被推定在功能上无关紧要,因此在临床上常被忽视。例如,FDA批准的cobas® KRAS突变检测就专门设计为忽略KRAS G12G和G13G沉默突变,以防止它们被无意中报告。尽管如此,在癌症患者中,沉默突变以较低频率聚集于KRAS的G12、G13和G60位点,即位于热点激活突变位置处或与之相邻。KRAS在进化上受到约束,在这些位置包含稀有密码子或密码子对,我们此前已证明,这些位置的任何沉默突变都会依照甘氨酸密码子使用频率增加KRAS蛋白表达,并驱动增殖及致瘤表型的增强。此外,在携带野生型(WT)KRAS肿瘤的癌症患者中,KRAS的高表达在泛癌队列中与不良预后相关。在此,我们利用靶向WT和突变型KRAS的KRAS抑制剂,考察携带同义KRAS变异的NIH3T3细胞相对于KRAS天然核苷酸序列以及致癌性G12V突变,如何对KRAS靶向抑制作出反应。过表达沉默型G12G、G13G和G60G KRAS突变的NIH3T3细胞,对三种具有不同作用机制的KRAS抑制剂表现出显著的生长抑制,与表达致癌性KRAS G12V变异的细胞相当,而与KRAS天然核苷酸序列形成对比。这些沉默突变体还表现出KRAS表达升高,以及经免疫印迹评估的ERK MAPK和PI3K信号改变,同时在KRAS抑制后出现差异性的通路抑制。总之,这些数据表明KRAS沉默突变体可能赋予类似致癌的信号传导及治疗敏感性,并挑战了所有同义变异在生物学上均为惰性的传统观念。我们的数据提示,含有沉默型KRAS突变的癌细胞不应被忽视,并可能代表一个治疗靶点。进一步的研究将阐明这些效应背后的机制并明确其临床相关性。正在进行和计划中的工作包括在非转化人类细胞的内源性位点上工程化改造沉默型KRAS突变,以在生理相关的环境中直接评估其对KRAS表达、下游信号传导和治疗反应的影响。
查看英文原文 English abstract
KRAS is mutated in over 90% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and is one of the most recalcitrant therapeutic targets. Activating missense mutations at G12, G13, and Q61 lock KRAS in a state of persistent signaling, driving PDAC growth. Synonymous, or silent, mutations are often disregarded clinically as they do not alter the encoded amino acid and are presumed functionally insignificant. For example, the FDA-approved cobas® KRAS Mutation Test is specifically designed to ignore KRAS G12G and G13G silent mutations, to prevent them from inadvertently being reported. Despite this, silent mutations cluster in KRAS with low frequency at G12, G13, and G60, at or adjacent to the hotspot activating mutation positions in cancer patients. KRAS is evolutionarily constrained to contain rare codons or codon pairs at these positions, and we have previously shown that any silent mutation at these positions increases KRAS protein expression in accordance with glycine codon usage frequency and drives increased proliferation and tumorigenic phenotypes. Furthermore, among cancer patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS tumors, high expression of KRAS is associated with a poor prognosis in a pan-cancer cohort. Here, utilizing KRAS inhibitors that target WT and mutant KRAS, we examine how NIH3T3 cells containing synonymous KRAS variants respond to targeted KRAS inhibition, relative to the native KRAS nucleotide sequence and the oncogenic G12V mutation. NIH3T3 cells overexpressing silent G12G, G13G, and G60G KRAS mutations exhibited marked growth inhibition in response to three KRAS inhibitors with different mechanisms of action, comparable to the oncogenic KRAS G12V-variant expressing cells and in contrast to the native KRAS nucleotide sequence. These silent mutant variants also demonstrated increased KRAS expression and altered ERK MAPK and PI3K signaling as assessed by immunoblotting, as well as differential pathway suppression following KRAS inhibition. Together these data demonstrate that KRAS silent mutants may confer oncogenic-like signaling and therapeutic sensitivity and challenge the paradigm that all synonymous variants are biologically inert. Our data suggest that cancer cells containing silent KRAS mutations should not be ignored and may represent a therapeutic target. Further studies will define the mechanisms underlying these effects and clarify their clinical relevance. Ongoing and planned work includes engineering silent KRAS mutations at the endogenous locus in non-transformed human cells to directly assess their impact on KRAS expression, downstream signaling, and therapeutic response in a physiologically relevant setting.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. A. Satyadi, None..
R. Bridgens, None..
H. Todd, None..
G. Goodhart, None.
S. A. Ahmad,
Abbvie Speaker.
A. M. Waters, None.