PO.BCS01.12 · 生物信息与计算
利用NVIDIA Parabricks通过GPU加速基因组分析来加速微小残留病(MRD)检测
Accelerating minimal residual disease (MRD) detection through GPU-accelerated genomic analysis using NVIDIA Parabricks
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
此前我们证明,通过靶向测序(TS)方法,经手术引流管收集的淋巴渗出液("淋巴液")中存在的ctDNA在检测头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的MRD方面优于血浆[1]。然而,检测超低频率变异需要深度测序覆盖和计算密集型的工作流程,往往导致周转时间较长。为提升TS方法的性能,我们实施了一个采用NVIDIA Parabricks[2]优化的MRD检测流程,以加速计算并在不影响准确性的前提下实现更快、可扩展的分子分析。
队列纳入了25例独特的HPV非依赖性HNSCC患者,以展示通过将我们的MRD工作流程从基于CPU的基础架构移植到GPU加速的Parabricks所带来的性能提升。临床有效性通过对这25例各自至少有1年临床随访数据的患者进行检测来评估,并使用确定的平均变异等位基因分数(VAF)将其分类为MRD阳性或MRD阴性。MRD分类结果与经CLIA/CAP验证的正交、肿瘤指导的基于全基因组测序的ctDNA MRD检测进行了比较。此外,由于文库制备和测序过程中引入的伪影仍然是灵敏检测低VAF突变的挑战,我们利用一系列高质量淋巴液参考样本构建了一个碱基错误模型(BEM),以减少测序伪影并最大化ctDNA信号,从而量化每个肿瘤变异的背景噪声[3]。在生成基线时,这一步骤采用了GPU加速流程。淋巴液样本中肿瘤来源的变异,如果其VAF不大于由错误发现率控制的BEM阈值,则被视为伪影。
我们在实施GPU加速的步骤中观察到处理时间和成本的显著降低。在比对阶段,我们将处理时间减少了30%,计算成本减少了15%。在肿瘤指导的变异检测阶段,我们将每个样本的平均处理时间从超过2小时减少到30分钟。对于BEM,结合VCF过滤的优化,我们将处理时间从超过5小时减少到45分钟,同时计算成本降低了60%。此外,我们的增强方法与经CLIA/CAP验证的检测之间的比较显示出高度一致性,使用Fisher精确检验得出p值 = 0.0005。我们实现了84%的符合率,表明GPU加速流程的准确性。
我们证明了使用NVIDIA Parabricks的GPU加速MRD流程能够以显著的性能提升提供临床级准确性,为辅助治疗决策提供可扩展、快速的分子见解。鉴于其优势,我们设想GPU加速将被证明是深度测序应用的一种有用的通用策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Previously we demonstrated that ctDNA present in lymphatic exudate collected via surgical drains (“lymph”) outperformed plasma for detecting MRD in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients through a targeted sequencing (TS) approach 1 . However, detecting ultra low frequency variants requires deep sequencing coverage and computationally intensive workflows, often resulting in long turnaround times. To enhance the performance of the TS approach, we implemented an MRD detection pipeline optimized with NVIDIA Parabricks 2 to accelerate computation and enable faster, scalable molecular analysis without compromising accuracy.
25 unique patients with HPV-independent HNSCC were included in the cohort to demonstrate the performance improvements by porting our MRD workflow from a CPU-based infrastructure to GPU-accelerated Parabricks. Clinical validity was assessed by testing those same 25 patients who each had a minimum of 1 year of clinical follow up data and using the determined mean variant allele fraction (VAF) to classify them as MRD-positive or MRD-negative. MRD classifications were compared to a CLIA / CAP-validated orthogonal tumor-informed whole-genome sequencing-based ctDNA MRD assay. Additionally, as artifacts introduced during library preparation and sequencing remain challenges to sensitive low VAF mutation detection, a base-error model (BEM) that reduces sequencing artifacts and maximizes ctDNA signal was built using a series of high-quality lymph reference samples to quantify the background noise of each tumor variant 3 . A GPU-accelerated pipeline was implemented for this step when generating the baseline. Tumor-derived variants in lymph samples were considered artifacts if the VAF was not greater than BEM cutoff controlled by false discovery rate.
We observed significant reduction in processing time and cost at the steps that implemented GPU acceleration. At alignment, we reduced processing time by 30% and computation cost by 15%. At tumor-informed variant calling, we reduced the average processing time from over 2 hours to 30 minutes per sample. For BEM, combined with optimization on VCF filtering, we have reduced processing time from over 5 hours to 45 minutes along with 60% reduction in computation cost. Furthermore, the comparison between our enhanced method and the CLIA / CAP-validated assay showed high concordance with p-val = 0.0005 using Fisher's exact test. We achieved 84% percent agreement, indicating the accuracy of the GPU-accelerated pipeline.
We demonstrated that our GPU-accelerated MRD pipeline using NVIDIA Parabricks delivers clinical-grade accuracy with significant performance boost, enabling scalable, rapid molecular insights for adjuvant decision making. Given its advantages, we envision that GPU acceleration will prove useful to be a general strategy for deep sequencing applications.
利益披露 Disclosure
Z. Gu, None..
A. Harmon, None..
M. Pacula, None..
M. Rivera, None..
Z. Costliow, None..
A. Tellis, None..
S. Lazare, None..
X. Zhao, None..
W. Winckler, None.