PO.BCS02.03 · 生物信息与计算
癌症中抑酸治疗处方的模式:我们是在治疗症状还是在助长疾病?
Patterns of acid-suppressive therapy prescriptions in cancer: Are we treating symptoms or fueling the disease?
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)或H₂受体拮抗剂是否影响癌症风险仍不确定,部分原因在于适应证混杂和反向因果关系。我们在一个大型数据集中分析了处方模式,以表征不同癌症类型中终生及诊断前对PPIs和H₂受体拮抗剂的暴露情况,重点关注上消化道(GI)恶性肿瘤。
方法:我们检查了NHS中340万(3,390,218)名有关联用药和癌症编码的成年人,识别终生抑酸剂使用情况,对于癌症病例,还识别了诊断前5年内的暴露情况。将食管癌、胃癌、胰腺癌或胆道癌患者与无癌症对照进行了专门比较。计算了各年龄段10年PPI和H₂受体拮抗剂的患病率,并以无癌症个体为对照,得出曾使用者的比值比(ORs)。
结果:共有1,078例食管癌、527例胃癌、696例胰腺癌和130例胆道癌患者。终生PPI暴露因癌症类型而显著不同:93%的食管癌患者(OR=35.0)、89%的胃癌患者(OR=21.2)以及65-75%的其他癌症类型报告使用PPI,而年龄匹配对照中这一比例为3-55%。H₂受体拮抗剂的使用显示出较弱的关联(OR 1.6-2.0)。
在诊断前5年区间,PPI暴露在食管癌(93.0%)、胃癌(89.0%)、胰腺癌(88.6%)和胆道癌(87.7%)中最高,中位持续时间为84天。诊断前PPI使用的持续时间显示出上消化道癌症特有的强梯度关系;H₂受体拮抗剂未见类似梯度。若干非消化道癌症,包括喉癌,也表现出PPI使用升高,尽管程度稍低。
结论:PPI暴露(包括终生使用和诊断前5年持续时间)在上消化道癌症患者中显著高于年龄匹配对照。虽然这可能反映了诊断前时期由症状驱动的治疗升级,但多种癌症中持续升高的暴露提示了PPIs本身可能参与致癌过程的可能性。H₂受体拮抗剂缺乏可比关联,提示单纯的抑酸作用无法解释所观察到的模式。上消化道癌症中显著的PPI富集、H₂受体拮抗剂较弱的信号以及在特定非消化道癌症中可检测到的关联,凸显了进一步研究的必要性,以确定PPIs究竟仅作为前驱症状的标志物,还是可能对癌症发生产生独立的相关效应。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H₂ antagonists influence cancer risk remains uncertain, partly due to confounding by indication and reverse causation. We analyzed prescribing patterns in a large dataset to characterize lifetime and pre-diagnostic exposure to PPIs and H₂ antagonists across cancer types, with emphasis on upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.
Methods: We examined 3,390,218 adults in the NHS with linked medication and cancer coding, identifying lifetime acid-suppressive use and, for cancer cases, exposure during the 5 years preceding diagnosis. Patients with oesophageal, stomach, pancreatic, or biliary tract cancers were specifically compared with cancer-free controls. Age-specific 10-year PPI and H₂ antagonist prevalence was calculated, and odds ratios (ORs) for ever-use were derived using cancer-free individuals as comparators.
Results: There were 1,078 oesophageal, 527 stomach, 696 pancreatic, and 130 biliary tract cancer patients. Lifetime PPI exposure differed markedly by cancer type: 93% of oesophageal cancer patients (OR=35.0), 89% of stomach cancer patients (OR=21.2), and 65-75% of other cancer types reported PPI use, compared with 3-55% among age-matched controls. H₂ antagonist use showed weaker associations (OR 1.6-2.0).
In the 5-year pre-diagnostic interval, PPI exposure was highest in oesophageal (93.0%), stomach (89.0%), pancreatic (88.6%), and biliary tract cancers (87.7%), with a median duration of 84 days. Duration of pre-diagnostic PPI use showed a strong gradient unique to upper-GI cancers; no similar gradient was seen for H₂ antagonists. Several non-GI cancers, including laryngeal cancer, also demonstrated elevated PPI use, though to a slightly lesser extent.
Conclusions: PPI exposure, both lifetime use and 5-year pre-diagnostic duration, was substantially higher among upper-GI cancer patients than among age-matched controls. While this may reflect symptom-driven escalation of therapy in the period preceding diagnosis, the consistently elevated exposure across multiple cancers raises the possibility that PPIs themselves may contribute to carcinogenic processes. The absence of comparable associations for H₂ antagonists suggests that acid suppression alone does not explain the observed patterns. Pronounced PPI enrichment in upper-GI cancers, weaker signals for H₂ antagonists, and detectable associations in selected non-GI cancers underscore the need for further work to determine whether PPIs act solely as markers of prodromal symptomatology or may exert independent effects relevant to cancer development.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Payling,
C the Signs g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role).
M. Sakal,
C the Signs Employment.