PO.CL01.21 · 临床研究
探索扩展液体活检在晚期乳腺癌和结直肠癌中的临床可操作性
Exploring clinical actionability of expanded liquid biopsy in advanced breast and colorectal cancers
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:通过血浆循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)分析的液体活检被用于辅助靶向治疗的选择。虽然晚期肺癌有若干具有FDA批准靶向治疗的生物标志物,但晚期乳腺癌(mBC)和结直肠癌(mCRC)的靶点较少。随着生物标志物的扩展和技术的演进,在广泛的ctDNA分析与临床可操作性(CA)之间取得平衡非常重要。本研究探索了一种整合基因组和表观基因组要素的液体活检的潜在CA。
方法:回顾性查询了2025年6月1日至7月16日期间作为常规临床诊疗的一部分接受基因组和表观基因组ctDNA检测(Guardant360 Liquid)的mBC(n=2149)和mCRC(n=1345)患者的结果;每例患者仅分析一次检测。结果成分按CA进行分类:即刻(指导当前治疗选择);扩展(可能为进一步检查或未来治疗线决策提供信息);其他(可能随时间影响诊疗的新型生物标志物)。每例患者被归入一组。药物基因组学(PGx)结果的可获得性被独立评估。
结果:>85%的mBC和mCRC患者具有CA结果,其中>50%被归类为即刻(表1)。对于mBC,99.9%的患者具有PGx结果,远高于已发表的检测率(<10%)。近1/2的mBC患者具有基于血液的分子乳腺亚型(MBS),这可能为激素受体和HER2状态的额外检查提供信息。270例mCRC患者具有生物标志物阴性(BN)结果,>95%的把握确认不存在FDA批准的靶点,从而实现快速的治疗选择。对于mCRC,99.9%具有PGx结果,是已发表检测率(30-50%)的两倍。诸如MBS和>95% BN等新型特征使mBC的CA提高了6.3%,使mCRC的CA提高了43.7%。
结论:兼具基因组和表观基因组特征的液体活检拓宽了在靶向治疗选择较少的肿瘤中的潜在CA。这些数据支持使用多方面的检测来指导一线和后线决策。
表1. mBC和mCRC中结果的可操作性和可获得性 mBC(n=2149) mCRC(n=1354) 结果可操作性 可操作发现总数 1841(85.7%) 1215(89.7%) 即刻:标签内或耐药改变、胚系或HRD/GIS(仅mBC)、>90%把握的生物标志物阴性(仅mCRC) 1080(50.3%) 939(69.4%) 扩展:临床试验或标签外选择、仅分子乳腺亚型(仅mBC) 611(28.4%) 203(15.0%) 其他:肿瘤分数>0.05% 150(7.0%) 73(5.4%) 结果可获得性 药物基因组学 2146(99.9%) 1352(99.9%) 分子乳腺亚型 1013(47.1%) 不适用 >90%把握的生物标志物阴性 不适用 321(23.7%)
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy via plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is used to aid in targeted therapy selection. While advanced lung cancer has a number of biomarkers with FDA-approved targeted therapies, advanced breast (mBC) and colorectal (mCRC) cancers have fewer targets. As biomarkers expand and technology evolves, it is important to balance broad ctDNA analysis with clinical actionability (CA). This study explored the potential CA of an integrated liquid biopsy leveraging genomic and epigenomic elements.
Methods: Results of mBC (n=2149) and mCRC (n=1345) patients who had genomic and epigenomic ctDNA testing (Guardant360 Liquid) as part of routine clinical care from June 1 - July 16, 2025, were retrospectively queried; only one test per patient was analyzed. Result components were categorized by CA: immediate (guides current therapy selection); expanded (may inform further work-up or future line decision); other (novel biomarkers that may influence care over time). Each patient was classified into one group. Availability of pharmacogenomic (PGx) results was assessed independently.
Results: >85% of mBC and mCRC patients had CA results with >50% classified as immediate (Table 1). For mBC, 99.9% of patients had PGx results, dramatically higher than published testing rates (<10%). Nearly 1 in 2 mBC patients had a blood-based molecular breast subtype (MBS) which may inform additional workup for hormone receptor and HER2 status. 270 mCRC patients had biomarker negative (BN) results with > 95% confidence in the absence of FDA-approved targets, enabling rapid therapy selection. For mCRC, 99.9% had PGx results, doubling published testing rates (30-50%). Novel features such as MBS and >95% BN increased CA by 6.3% in mBC and 43.7% in mCRC.
Conclusions: A liquid biopsy with both genomic and epigenomic features broadens potential CA in tumors with few targeted therapy options. This data supports use of a multifaceted assay to guide first- and later-line decisions.
Table 1. Result actionability and availability in mBC and mCRC mBC (n=2149) mCRC (n=1354) RESULT ACTIONABILTY Total Actionable Findings 1841 (85.7%) 1215 (89.7%) Immediate: On-label or resistance alteration, Germline or HRD/GIS (mBC only), > 90% Confident biomarker negative (mCRC only) 1080 (50.3%) 939 (69.4%) Expanded: Clinical trial or off-label option, Molecular breast subtyping only (mBC only) 611 (28.4%) 203 (15.0%) Other: Tumor fraction >0.05% 150 (7.0%) 73 (5.4%) RESULT AVAILABILITY Pharmacogenomics 2146 (99.9%) 1352 (99.9%) Molecular Breast Subtyping 1013 (47.1%) N/A > 90% Confident Biomarker Negative N/A 321 (23.7%)
利益披露 Disclosure
K. Clemens,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
L. Bucheit,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
S. Forbes,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
H. Alshurafa,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
A. Das,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
H. Eltoukhy,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.