PO.CL01.21 · 临床研究
整合机器学习以优化血液系统恶性肿瘤综合基因组分析测定中的 FFPE 变异检出
Integrating machine learning to optimize FFPE variant calling in a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for hematologic malignancies
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
淋巴瘤和其他血液系统恶性肿瘤的最佳临床管理需要评估一组临床相关基因中的体细胞突变。然而,大多数淋巴瘤标本在经甲醛固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)后接收,该过程可诱发 DNA 损伤,导致在使用二代测序(NGS)检测时特异度降低。在此,我们展示了一个针对泛血液系统适应证、包含 141 个临床相关基因的靶向 NGS 面板使用 FFPE 样本的分析验证结果。我们还描述了一个针对 FFPE 标本执行额外过滤步骤的分析流程。该分析流程旨在分析在同一流动槽上测序的 FFPE 和非 FFPE 样本(来自髓系或淋巴系恶性肿瘤的血液/骨髓样本),并自动针对每种标本类型执行特定分析。FFPE 相较于血液/骨髓具有不同的变异检出参数,并采用额外的随机森林机器学习(ML)模型来过滤与 FFPE 伪影相关的变异。该 FFPE NGS 面板检测 141 个基因的所有编码外显子,以检测变异等位基因频率 ≥ 5% 时长达 50bp 的单核苷酸变异(SNV)和插入/缺失(indel)。该定制的基于杂交捕获的测定利用从 FFPE 组织提取的 50-182.5 ng gDNA 创建的基因组文库,随后在 Illumina® 仪器上测序。使用先前采用正交 NGS 测定评估 SNV/indel 的临床样本进行了一致性研究。总共评估了 198 份 FFPE 样本,包括 72 份独特的临床 FFPE 样本。一致性分析显示 SNV/indel 的阳性符合率(PPA)为 93.9%(388/413),假发现率(FDR)为 4.9%(20/408)。测定精密度使用 5 份临床 FFPE 样本在最小 DNA 投入量下的三个重复进行确定,用于测定内和测定间精密度。总体精密度为 95.9%(394/411)。基于 6 份临床 FFPE 样本获得的结果,确定最小 DNA 投入量为 >50ng 投入材料。基于 5 个 FFPE NA12878 重复,SNV/indel 的分析特异度 >99.99%。基于命中率稀释系列,SNV/indel 的分析灵敏度为 3.7% VAF。在整个研究中,ML 模型去除了 10 个假定的假阳性。在 44 份临床 FFPE 分析的独立测试集上的性能显示一致性为 95.5%(445/466),而不使用 ML 模型时为 89.5%(445/497)。这些数据描述了一种测定的 FFPE 性能,该测定能够使用单一实验室工作流程,从所有主要标本类型和适应证对血液系统恶性肿瘤中的基因组改变进行全面评估。该工作流程包括一个灵活的流程,配有可选的 ML 模型,以成功过滤与 FFPE DNA 损伤相关的伪影。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Optimal clinical management of lymphoma and other hematological malignancies require assessment of somatic mutations across a subset of clinically relevant genes. However, most lymphoma specimens are received after being formalin fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), a process that can induce DNA damage leading to reduced specificity when assayed with next generation sequencing (NGS). Here we present the analytical validation results of a targeted NGS panel of 141 clinically relevant genes for pan-heme indications using FFPE samples. We also describe an analysis pipeline that performs additional filtering steps for FFPE specimens. The analysis pipeline is designed to analyze FFPE and non-FFPE samples (blood/bone marrow samples from myeloid or lymphoid malignancies) sequenced on the same flow cell with specific analysis performed for each specimen type automatically. FFPE has distinct variant calling parameters compared to blood/bone marrow and an additional random forest machine learning (ML) model to filter variants associated with FFPE artifacts. The FFPE NGS panel interrogates all coding exons of the 141 genes to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels) up to 50bp at variant allele frequency ≥ 5%. The custom hybrid capture-based assay utilizes genomic libraries created from 50-182.5 ng gDNA extracted from FFPE tissue, followed by sequencing on Illumina® instruments. Concordance studies were performed on clinical samples previously assessed using orthogonal NGS-based assays for SNVs/indels. In total, 198 FFPE samples including 72 unique clinical FFPE samples were assessed. Analysis of concordance demonstrated a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 93.9% for SNV/indels (388/413) and false discovery rate (FDR) of 4.9% (20/408). Assay precision was determined using three replicates of 5 clinical FFPE samples at minimal DNA input for both intra and inter-assay precision. Overall precision was 95.9% (394/411). Minimal DNA input was established to be >50ng of input material based on results obtained from 6 clinical FFPE samples. Analytical specificity was >99.99% for SNVs/indels based on 5 replicates of FFPE NA12878. Analytical sensitivity was 3.7% VAF for SNV/indels based on a hit rate dilution series. The ML model removed 10 putative FPs throughout the study. Performance on an independent test set of 44 clinical FFPE analysis showed concordance of 95.5% (445/466) compared to 89.5% (445/497) without the ML model. These data describe the FFPE performance of an assay that enables a comprehensive evaluation of genomic alterations in hematologic malignancies from all major specimen types and indications using one laboratory workflow. The workflow includes a flexible pipeline with an optional ML model to successfully filter artefacts associated with FFPE DNA damage.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. Hogg,
Labcorp Employment.
T. Liu,
Labcorp Employment, Stock Option.
H. Cao,
Labcorp Employment.
A. Shafi,
Labcorp Employment.
A. Williamson,
Labcorp Employment.
A. Shabaneh,
Labcorp Employment.
K. A. Holden,
Labcorp Employment.
J. Howitt,
Labcorp Employment.
X. Guan,
Labcorp Employment.
M. Mooney,
Labcorp Employment.
L. Cai,
Labcorp Employment.
E. A. Severson,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
M. Senosain,
Labcorp Employment.
E. Vanroey,
Labcorp Employment.
S. Ramkissoon,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
Wake Forest School of Medicine Employment.
A. Chenn,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
R. Daber,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
M. Eisenberg,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
B. Caveney,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
E. Almasri,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
T. Jensen,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.
J. Williams,
Labcorp Employment, Stock.