PO.CL02.01 · 临床研究

可切除胰腺导管腺癌的辅助免疫治疗:对ClinicalTrials.gov的25年格局分析(2000-2025)

Adjuvant immunotherapy in resected pancreatic ductal denocarcinoma: A 25-year landscape analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (2000-2025)

海报缩略图:可切除胰腺导管腺癌的辅助免疫治疗:对ClinicalTrials.gov的25年格局分析(2000-2025)
编号 6436 展板 3 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 40 主讲 Carmel Awadallah, MD
分会场 Biostatistics in Clinical Trials / Surgical Oncology
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Carmel Awadallah1, Myer Marc Warshawsky2

1St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, NY,2Hematology and Oncology, St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, NY

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:尽管有辅助化疗,胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)仍是最致命的恶性肿瘤之一。免疫治疗已在其他实体瘤中改变了辅助治疗格局,但其在PDAC中的作用尚未明确。我们旨在描述可切除PDAC辅助全身治疗试验的格局,重点关注免疫治疗,以识别进展及影响临床转化的障碍。 方法:我们检索ClinicalTrials.gov上于2000年1月至2025年1月期间注册的、针对可切除PDAC的干预性2-3期辅助治疗试验。试验被分类为免疫治疗、靶向治疗、其他新型全身治疗策略或传统化疗。提取并以描述性方式总结了试验分期、入组人数、申办方类型和终点。 结果:共识别出36项符合条件的试验。大多数为2期(n=27,75%),仅有两项3期研究(6%)。入组人数有限:27项试验(75%)纳入患者少于50例,仅3项(8%)入组≥200例。总生存期是最常见的终点(n=35,97%),其次是安全性/毒性(n=23,64%)和无病生存期(n=10,28%);外科终点较为罕见,包括R0切除(n=6,17%)和病理完全缓解(n=2,6%)。申办方以学术机构为主(n=28,78%),企业主导(n=3,8%)或混合(n=5,14%)参与有限。免疫治疗方法主要为疫苗(GVAX、TG-01、ELI-002)和免疫调节剂,仅有一项小型试验测试了检查点抑制剂(CT-011)。 结论:二十多年来,PDAC的辅助免疫治疗尚未超越小型探索性研究的阶段。这些试验检验效能不足、以学术机构主导,且主要集中于基于疫苗的策略,对检查点抑制剂的评估极少,也没有明确的3期项目。亟需开展检验效能充分、有企业支持的3期试验,以确立可切除PDAC中有效的辅助免疫治疗策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies despite adjuvant chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has transformed adjuvant therapy in other solid tumors, yet its role in PDAC is undefined. We aimed to characterize the landscape of adjuvant systemic trials in resected PDAC, with a focus on immunotherapy, to identify progress and barriers to clinical impact. Methods: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov for interventional phase 2-3 adjuvant trials in resected PDAC registered between January 2000 and January 2025. Trials were categorized as immunotherapy, targeted therapy, other novel systemic strategies, or traditional chemotherapy. Phase, enrollment, sponsor type, and endpoints were extracted and summarized descriptively. Results: Thirty-six eligible trials were identified. Most were phase 2 (n=27, 75%), with only two phase 3 studies (6%). Enrollment was modest: 27 trials (75%) included fewer than 50 patients, while only three (8%) enrolled ≥200. Overall survival was the most common endpoint (n=35, 97%), followed by safety/toxicity (n=23, 64%) and disease-free survival (n=10, 28%); surgical endpoints were rare, including R0 resection (n=6, 17%) and pathologic complete response (n=2, 6%). Sponsorship was predominantly academic (n=28, 78%), with limited industry-led (n=3, 8%) or mixed (n=5, 14%) involvement. Immunotherapy approaches were mainly vaccines (GVAX, TG-01, ELI-002) and immune modulators, with only one small trial testing a checkpoint inhibitor (CT-011). Conclusions: Over two decades, adjuvant immunotherapy in PDAC has not advanced beyond small, exploratory studies. Trials were underpowered, academic-led, and focused largely on vaccine-based strategies, with minimal checkpoint inhibitor evaluation and no definitive phase 3 programs. Adequately powered, industry-supported phase 3 trials are urgently needed to establish effective adjuvant immunotherapy strategies in resected PDAC.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Awadallah, None.. M. Warshawsky, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索