PO.CL05.06 · 临床研究
通过CBM588调节微生物组可减弱接受双重免疫检查点阻断的转移性肾细胞癌患者的T细胞耗竭
Microbiome modulation via CBM588 dampens T cell exhaustion in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on dual immune checkpoint blockade
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已被充分描述可增强T细胞应答并提升抗肿瘤免疫应答,多种针对PD-1、PD-L1或CTLA-4的单克隆抗体治疗使多种不同适应证的患者获得生存获益的增加。虽然纳武利尤单抗(nivo)和伊匹木单抗(ipi)的联合目前是转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的标准治疗之一,但大多数患者仍遭受疾病进展。CBM588是一种活体生物治疗产品,此前已证明能够增强mRCC患者对nivo+ipi治疗的临床应答。在我们当前的研究中,我们试图探索接受nivo+ipi单独治疗与接受CBM588+nivo+ipi治疗患者的免疫相关性。
方法:从参加两项临床试验的mRCC患者采集外周血:最初的CBM588+nivo+ipi研究(NCT0382911)和一项正在进行的CBM588剂量探索研究(NCT06399419)。两项试验均纳入具有透明细胞和/或肉瘤样组织学的初治mRCC患者。最初试验以2:1的比例纳入接受或不接受CBM588共同治疗的患者。最初试验纳入接受或不接受4×10⁸ CFU/剂量CBM588治疗的患者,而剂量递增研究遵循3+3设计,设有三个CBM588剂量水平(4×10⁸ CFU、1.2×10⁹ CFU和4×10⁹ CFU)。将冻存血液解冻并通过高参数光谱流式细胞术分析整体免疫组成和详细T细胞表型。
结果:接受或不接受CBM588治疗的患者之间在髓系细胞或固有淋巴细胞变化方面未观察到显著差异。从基线到第3周期第1天,所有患者中均观察到增殖性CD8+ T细胞(Ki-67+)频率增加。与单独接受nivo+ipi治疗的患者相比,接受CBM588+nivo+ipi治疗的患者中增殖性CD8+ T细胞的扩增明显较为缓和。值得注意的是,所识别的扩增中的Ki-67+ CD8+ T细胞群相对于其他循环CD8+ T细胞群表现出T细胞耗竭特征,CD127(IL-7R)表达较低,CD38、KLRG1、TIM-3表达较高。
结论:我们的结果表明,CBM588可能通过抑制CD8+ T细胞扩增并减弱T细胞耗竭特征来改善患者对ICI的应答。CBM588+nivo+ipi剂量递增研究仍在进行,进一步的免疫相关性分析待定。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are well-described to augment T cell responses and boost anti-tumor immune responses, with increased survival benefits of patients with a number of different indications treated with a variety of PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4 targeting monoclonal antibodies. While the combination of nivolumab (nivo) and ipilimumab (ipi) is currently one of the standard-of-care treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the majority of patients still suffer disease progression. CBM588 is a live biotherapeutic product that has previously demonstrated ability to enhance clinical responses to nivo+ipi treatment in patients with mRCC. In our current study, we sought to explore immune correlatives of patients treated with nivo+ipi alone as compared to those treated with CBM588+nivo+ipi.
Methods: Peripheral blood was collected from patients with mRCC treated across two clinical trials: the initial CBM588+nivo+ipi study (NCT0382911) and an ongoing CBM588 dose finding study of patients with (NCT06399419). Both trials enrolled treatment-naïve patient with mRCC with clear cell and/or sarcomatoid histology. The initial trial enrolled patients with or without CBM588 co-treatment at a 2:1 ratio. The initial trial enrolled patients treated with or without CBM588 at 4 × 10 8 CFU/dose, while the dose escalation study followed a 3+3 design with three dose levels of CBM588 (4 × 10 8 CFU, 1.2 × 10 9 CFU, and 4 × 10 9 CFU). Cryopreserved blood was thawed and analyzed by high parameter spectral flow cytometry for overall immune composition and detailed T cell phenotyping.
Results: No significant differences were observed in myeloid cell or innate lymphocyte changes between patients treated with or without CBM588. Increased frequencies of proliferating CD8+ T cells (Ki-67+) were observed across all patients from baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1. The expansion of proliferating CD8+ T cells was significantly less accelerated in patients treated with CBM588+nivo+ipi as compared to those treated with nivo+ipi alone. Notably, the expanding Ki-67+ CD8+ T cell population identified demonstrated features of T cell exhaustion with less expression of CD127 (IL-7R) and higher expression of CD38, KLRG1, TIM-3 relative to other circulating CD8+ T cell populations.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that CBM588 may improve patient responses to ICIs by restraining CD8+ T cell amplification and attenuating features of T cell exhaustion. The CBM588+nivo+ipi dose escalation study is still ongoing with further immune correlative analyses pending.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. A. Egelston, None..
M. Zugman, None..
H. Ebrahimi, None..
N. Dizman, None..
S. Jaime-Casas, None..
X. Li, None..
D. V. Castro, None..
B. Mercier, None.
M. Takahashi,
Miyarisan Pharmaceuticals Employment.
A. Hayashi,
Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Employment.
T. Parks,
Osel Inc Employment.
S. K. Pal, None.
P. P. Lee,
Osel Inc g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role).
A. Chehrazi-Raffle, None.