PO.CL07.04 · 临床研究

CDK4/6与PI3K/mTOR通路的趋同性过度激活在RB1功能完好和RB1缺陷背景下均定义了骨肉瘤中一个可靶向的轴

Convergent CDK4/6 and PI3K/mTOR pathway hyperactivation defines a targetable axis in osteosarcoma across RB1-proficient and RB1-deficient contexts

海报缩略图:CDK4/6与PI3K/mTOR通路的趋同性过度激活在RB1功能完好和RB1缺陷背景下均定义了骨肉瘤中一个可靶向的轴
编号 6483 展板 1 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 42 主讲 Lauren Stevens, BS
分会场 Combination Targeted Therapy
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Lauren K. Stevens1, M. Reza Saadatzadeh2, Farinaz Barghi3, Erika A. Dobrota4, Harlan E. Shannon4, Rada Malko3, Ryli Justice4, Christopher Davis4, Keiko Kreklau4, Melissa A. Trowbridge5, Kathy Coy5, Felicia M. Kennedy5, Anthony L. Sinn5, Kyle W. Jackson2, George Sandusky6, L. Daniel Wurtz7, Christopher D. Collier7, Dana Mitchell4, Ed Greenfield7, Emma H. Doud8, Amber L. Mosley8, Steven P. Angus2, Pankita H. Pandya2, Karen E. Pollok2

1Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,2Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,3Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,4Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,5Preclinical Modeling and Therapeutics Core, IUSCCC, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,8Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Center for Proteome Analysis, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
儿童、青少年和年轻成人(AYA)患者的骨肉瘤(OS)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,治疗进展有限。约40%的OS患者会随时间发展出转移,15-20%的OS患者在初诊时即已出现转移。因此,迫切需要开发更好的治疗方法。来自我们机构和其他机构的基因组分析突显了CDKN2A和CDK4/6的反复改变,提示CDK4/6抑制(CDK4/6i)是一个合理的治疗易感点。尽管RB1功能完好(RB1+)被认为是CDK4/6i应答所必需的,但超过70%的OS肿瘤为RB1缺陷(RB1-),这对CDK4/6i在这些患者中的效用提出了疑问。其他实体瘤中以及我们初步的OS研究中的新兴证据提示,CDK4/6i在RB1-背景下可能仍保留抗肿瘤活性。使这一复杂性进一步加剧的是,药理学CDK4/6阻断会诱导代偿性PI3K/mTOR信号,从而可恢复cyclin D-CDK4/6活性并驱动耐药。 我们假设,通过抑制适应性信号,共同靶向PI3K/mTOR将增强CDK4/6i的疗效,且不受RB1状态影响。我们使用细胞系、患者来源异种移植物(PDX)和实验性转移模型,在RB1+和RB1- OS模型中评估了帕博西尼(palbociclib)、voxtalisib及二者联合。体外药物相互作用(Chou-Talalay、Bliss)和机制检测(细胞周期、衰老、自噬)与体内肿瘤生长动力学以及通过组织病理学、激酶组学和蛋白质组学分析的药效学表征相互补充。 在体外RB1+ OS细胞中,帕博西尼诱导G1期阻滞和衰老,并伴随PI3K/AKT磷酸化增加,与适应性反馈一致。Voxtalisib抑制了这一反应,增强了自噬信号,并维持了通路抑制。在体内,联合治疗耐受性良好,在初治和转移性PDX中产生了显著的肿瘤生长抑制。在RB1+肺定植模型中,单用CDK4/6i减少了转移负荷,联合治疗则实现了相当的控制。 为探究RB1作为生物标志物的作用,我们生成并表征了CRISPR工程改造的人和小鼠RB1- OS克隆(MG63.3、K7M2)。正如预期,voxtalisib的应答不依赖于RB1,而在RB1-细胞中帕博西尼的敏感性降低。然而,RB1-细胞在较高帕博西尼浓度下仍表现出生长抑制。值得注意的是,无论RB1状态如何,帕博西尼+voxtalisib的联合治疗都产生了相加至协同的生长抑制。体内验证研究正在进行中。这些发现将趋同性的CDK4/6-PI3K/mTOR过度激活确定为OS中一个可靶向的轴,并支持进一步评估基于CDK4/6i的策略,包括在RB1缺陷型疾病中的应用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) patients is an aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic progress. About 40% of OS patients develop metastases over time with 15-20% of OS patients already exhibiting metastases at initial diagnosis. Thus, there is a critical need to develop better therapeutics. Genomic analyses from our institution and others highlight recurrent alterations in CDKN2A and CDK4/6, suggesting that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) is a rational therapeutic vulnerability. Although RB1 proficiency (RB1+) is considered essential for CDK4/6i response, over 70% of OS tumors are RB1-deficient (RB1-), raising questions about the utility of CDK4/6i in these patients. Emerging evidence in other solid tumors and in our preliminary OS studies, suggests that CDK4/6i may retain antitumor activity in RB1- contexts. Compounding this complexity, pharmacologic CDK4/6 blockade induces compensatory PI3K/mTOR signaling, which can restore cyclin D-CDK4/6 activity and drive resistance. We hypothesized that co-targeting PI3K/mTOR would enhance CDK4/6i efficacy irrespective of RB1 status by suppressing adaptive signaling. We evaluated palbociclib, voxtalisib, and the combination across RB1+ and RB1- OS models, using cell lines, patient derived xenografts (PDXs), and an experimental metastasis model. In vitro drug interactions (Chou-Talalay, Bliss) and mechanistic assays (cell cycle, senescence, autophagy) were complemented by in vivo tumor growth kinetics and pharmacodynamic profiling through histopathology, kinome, and proteomic analyses. In RB1+ OS cells in vitro, palbociclib induced G1 arrest and senescence, accompanied by increased PI3K/AKT phosphorylation consistent with adaptive feedback. Voxtalisib suppressed this response, reinforced autophagic signaling, and maintained pathway inhibition. In vivo, combination therapy was well tolerated and produced significant tumor growth suppression in treatment-naïve and metastatic PDXs. In the RB1+ lung-colonization model, CDK4/6i alone reduced metastatic burden, with combination therapy achieving comparable control. To interrogate RB1 as a biomarker, CRISPR-engineered human and mouse RB1- OS clones (MG63.3, K7M2) were generated and characterized. As expected, voxtalisib response was RB1-independent, and palbociclib sensitivity was reduced in RB1- cells. However, RB1- cells still exhibited growth inhibition at higher palbociclib concentrations. Notably, combination therapy of palbociclib+voxtalisib produced additive-to-synergistic growth inhibition regardless of RB1 status. In vivo validation studies are ongoing. These findings identify convergent CDK4/6-PI3K/mTOR hyperactivation as a targetable axis in OS and support further evaluation of CDK4/6i-based strategies, including in RB1-deficient disease.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. K. Stevens, None.. M. R. Saadatzadeh, None.. F. Barghi, None.. E. A. Dobrota, None.. H. E. Shannon, None.. R. Malko, None.. R. Justice, None.. C. Davis, None.. K. Kreklau, None.. M. A. Trowbridge, None.. K. Coy, None.. F. M. Kennedy, None.. A. L. Sinn, None.. K. W. Jackson, None.. G. Sandusky, None.. L. D. Wurtz, None.. C. D. Collier, None.. D. Mitchell, None.. E. Greenfield, None.. E. H. Doud, None.. A. L. Mosley, None.. S. P. Angus, None.. P. H. Pandya, None.. K. E. Pollok, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索