PO.CL08.01 · 临床研究
干细胞转决定是直肠癌新辅助放化疗治疗反应的一个可靶向驱动因素
Stem cell transdetermination is a targetable driver of therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
在英国,约三分之一的直肠癌病例采用新辅助放化疗(nCRT),但治疗反应存在异质性,导致反应预测和增敏方面的困难。表型可塑性由细胞内在突变和来自肿瘤微环境(TME)的细胞外在信号共同驱动,已被证明会影响结直肠癌的治疗耐药性。本研究探讨增殖性癌症干细胞(proCSC)和复苏性癌症干细胞(revCSC)在放化疗(CRT)反应中的作用,以及如何靶向表型可塑性以提高CRT敏感性。
来自10例微卫星稳定型直肠癌患者队列的患者来源类器官(PDO)接受了放射、化疗、探索性放射增敏剂以及与癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAF)共培养的组合扰动。PDO在放射后3小时和48小时进行分析,每组三个重复,共计2,400种实验条件。PDO采用单细胞硫醇-类器官原位条形码质谱流式(TOB is MC)进行分析,从而能够对CSC状态、DNA损伤反应、经典信号通路、细胞周期和凋亡进行高维表征。
PDO对CRT表现出异质性、患者特异性的反应,可按以下方式分类:1)高信号反应、高凋亡;2)高信号反应、低凋亡;3)低信号反应、低凋亡。治疗诱导的凋亡与靶向DNA损伤不相关,而是与基线干细胞指数(SCI)密切吻合,SCI是描述每个PDO相对proCSC-revCSC比例的指标。在基线时以proCSC为主(高SCI)的PDO中观察到更高的凋亡率,而以revCSC为主(低SCI)的PDO在治疗后更能抵抗凋亡。在某些低SCI的PDO中,可在放射前使用PI3Ka激活剂富集proCSC群体,从而在放射后增加凋亡且毒性很小。CRT后,整个队列中观察到SCI显著降低。使用YAP/TEAD1抑制剂阻断revCSC转决定同样导致放射诱导的凋亡增加。CRT后SCI差异较大的高度可塑性PDO可通过高DACH1表达来识别。
本研究提示,CRT后靶向DNA损伤的初始水平并不决定细胞死亡,而是取决于损伤发生时癌细胞所处的状态。我们发现处于proCSC状态的直肠癌细胞通常在DNA损伤时进入凋亡,而处于revCSC状态的癌细胞则能在治疗中存活。我们还发现,药理学上富集proCSC并阻断进入revCSC状态可使PDO对CRT增敏,这在治疗直肠癌方面可能具有重要意义。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is used in about one third of rectal cancer cases in the UK, but treatment response is heterogeneous, leading to difficulties in response prediction and sensitization. Phenotypic plasticity, driven by both cell-intrinsic mutations and cell-extrinsic signals from the tumour microenvironment (TME) has been shown to influence therapy resistance in colorectal cancer. This study explores the role of proliferative cancer stem cells (proCSCs) and revival cancer stem cells (revCSCs) in CRT response, and how phenotypic plasticity can be targeted to improve CRT sensitivity.
Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from a cohort of 10 patients with microsatellite-stable rectal cancer were subject to combinatorial perturbations of radiation, chemotherapy, exploratory radiosensitizers, and co-culture with cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs). PDOs were analysed 3 hours and 48 hours after radiation in triplicate, totalling 2,400 experimental conditions. PDOs were analysed using single-cell thiol-organoid barcoding in situ mass cytometry (TOB is MC), enabling high-dimensional characterisation of CSC states, DNA damage responses, canonical signalling pathways, cell cycle, and apoptosis.
PDOs displayed heterogeneous, patient-specific responses to CRT, and could be classified in the following manner: 1) high signalling response, high apoptosis; 2) high signalling response, low apoptosis; and 3) low signalling response, low apoptosis. Therapy-induced apoptosis did not correlate with on-target DNA damage, but instead strongly aligned with baseline stem cell index (SCI), a metric that describes the relative proCSC-revCSC ratio of each PDO. Higher rates of apoptosis were seen in PDOs that were proCSC-dominant at baseline (high-SCI), whereas revCSC-dominant PDOs (low-SCI) were more resistant apoptosis after treatment. In certain low-SCI PDOs, the proCSC population could be enriched using a PI3Ka activator before radiation, resulting in increased apoptosis after radiation with little toxicity. After CRT, a significant reduction in SCI was seen across the cohort. Blockade of revCSC transdetermination with a YAP/TEAD1 inhibitor also resulted in increased radiation-induced apoptosis. Highly plastic PDOs exhibiting large differences SCI following CRT were identified by high DACH1 expression.
This study suggests that the initial level of on-target DNA-damage following CRT does not dictate cell death, rather, it is due to what state the cancer cell is in when the damage occurs. We find that rectal cancer cells in a proCSC state typically enter apoptosis in response to DNA damage, whereas cancer cells in the revCSC state survive therapy. We also find that pharmacologically enriching proCSCs and blocking access to the revCSC state can sensitize PDOs to CRT, and may have therapeutic importance in treating rectal cancer.
利益披露 Disclosure
N. Li, None..
P. Vlckova, None..
A. Wilkinson, None..
E. Basiarz, None..
A. Dobric, None..
C. Molyneux, None..
R. O'Sullivan, None..
S. Crampsie, None..
B. Vanhaesebroeck, None..
M. A. Hawkins, None..
C. Tape, None.