PO.CT01.04 · 临床试验

乙胺嘧啶治疗局部区域晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的2期机会窗口试验

Phase 2 window of opportunity trial of pyrimethamine in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

海报缩略图:乙胺嘧啶治疗局部区域晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的2期机会窗口试验
编号 CT241 展板 6 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 50 主讲 Paul Zolkind, MD
分会场 Phase II Clinical Trials
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Paul Zolkind1, Emily M. Wilkerson1, Harit Panda1, Julius Chembo1, James Sun1, Kate Zhao1, Jessica Ley1, Michael Atteberry1, Nathan Wamsley1, Sidra Major1, Kynlee Giesie1, Luke Chen2, Ryan S. Jackson1, Jason Rich1, Patrik Pipkorn1, Alex Harbison1, Anthony J. Apicelli1, Jennifer De Los Santos1, Wade L. Thorstad1, Sidharth V. Puram1, Peter Oppelt1, Douglas Adkins1, Michael B. Major1

1Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO,2Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, NJ

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:NRF2应激反应通路的组成型激活在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)中常见,可促进代谢重编程、免疫逃逸和放疗抵抗。通过整合组学,我们鉴定出乙胺嘧啶(PYR)——一种FDA批准的抗原虫药物——是一种通过抑制二氢叶酸还原酶(DHFR)来降解NRF2蛋白的强效药物。在NRF2活化小鼠模型中的临床前研究表明,PYR具有生物学疗效和安全的毒性特征。 方法:这项单臂2期机会窗口试验在局部区域晚期HNSCC患者手术前给予PYR(50mg口服每日一次,共14天)。主要疗效假设为PYR将使肿瘤DHFR蛋白增加50%,这是DHFR抑制和靶向生物学疗效的替代指标。主要安全性终点为因PYR发生≥3级不良事件(AE)或治疗相关手术延迟≥10天的患者比例。次要终点包括安全性、耐受性,以及在治疗前样本中被分类为NRF2活化的肿瘤中NRF2通路的抑制。同时,开展了小鼠同基因口腔癌(MOC1)细胞系和肿瘤移植物的临床前研究,以评估DHFR抑制作为抑制一碳代谢并使肿瘤对放疗增敏的治疗策略。 结果:共入组22例患者,其中20例完成试验,临床III期(n=6,30%)和IV期(n=14,70%)疾病。2例患者在入组后退出,1例在开始治疗前,1例在首剂后。与基线相比,所有20份治疗后样本中肿瘤DHFR均增加50%或以上(平均增幅:1,282%,范围:335-5263%,校正p值:0.00032),表明具有强效的靶向活性。未发生治疗相关的≥3级AE和≥10天的手术延迟。2例患者显示高基线NRF2通路活性,但NRF2靶基因中的表达变化存在异质性。临床前研究表明,在多种HNSCC细胞系中DHFR抑制与NRF2抑制相关。对荷MOC1肿瘤的C57Bl/6小鼠的治疗表明,DHFR抑制增强了对放疗的敏感性(每队列n=10,p=0.01)。 结论:新辅助PYR在人HNSCC肿瘤中实现了强效的DHFR抑制,且安全性特征可接受。平行的临床前数据显示DHFR抑制驱动的NRF2抑制和放射增敏。这项首创试验和临床前研究为开展将PYR与根治性放疗为基础的治疗相整合以治疗NRF2活化HNSCC的2期试验提供了充分理由。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Constitutive activation of the NRF2 stress response pathway is a common occurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), promoting metabolic reprogramming, immune evasion, and resistance to radiation therapy. Through integrative omics, we identified pyrimethamine (PYR), an FDA-approved antiprotozoal agent, as a potent degrader of NRF2 protein via inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). Preclinical studies in NRF2-active mouse models demonstrated that PYR has biologic efficacy and a safe toxicity profile. Methods: This single-arm phase 2 window-of-opportunity trial administered PYR (50mg PO daily x 14 days) before surgery in patients with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. The primary efficacy hypothesis was that PYR would result in a 50% increase in tumor DHFR protein, a surrogate of DHFR inhibition and on-target biologic efficacy. The primary safety endpoint was proportion of patients who experienced ≥ grade 3 adverse events (AE) due to PYR or treatment-related delay in surgery by ≥ 10 days. Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and NRF2 pathway suppression among tumors classified as NRF2-active in pre-treatment samples. In parallel, preclinical studies with mouse syngeneic oral cancer (MOC1) cell lines and tumor grafts were performed to assess DHFR inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to suppress one carbon metabolism and sensitize tumors to radiation therapy. Results: 22 patients were enrolled, 20 of whom completed the trial with clinical stage III (n=6, 30%) and stage IV (n=14, 70%) disease. Two patients withdrew after enrollment, one prior to starting treatment and one after the first dose. Tumor DHFR increased by 50% or more in all 20 post-treatment samples compared to baseline (mean increase: 1,282%, range: 335-5263%, adjusted p-value: 0.00032), demonstrating potent on-target activity. Treatment-related ≥ grade 3 AEs and surgery delays ≥ 10 days did not occur. Two patients demonstrated high baseline NRF2 pathway activity but expression changes among NRF2 target genes were heterogeneous. Preclinical studies demonstrated DHFR inhibition was associated with NRF2 suppression across multiple HNSCC cell lines. Treatment of MOC1 tumor-bearing C57Bl/6 mice demonstrated that DHFR inhibition enhanced sensitivity to radiation therapy (n=10 per cohort, p=0.01). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant PYR achieved robust DHFR inhibition in human HNSCC tumors with an acceptable safety profile. Parallel preclinical data showed DHFR inhibition-driven NRF2 suppression and radiosensitization. This first-in-class trial and preclinical studies are strong rationale for a phase 2 trial integrating PYR with definitive radiation-based therapy for NRF2-active HNSCCs.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. Zolkind, None.. E. M. Wilkerson, None.. H. Panda, None.. J. Chembo, None.. J. Sun, None.. K. Zhao, None.. J. Ley, None.. M. Atteberry, None.. N. Wamsley, None.. S. Major, None.. K. Giesie, None.. L. Chen, None.. R. S. Jackson, None.. J. Rich, None.. P. Pipkorn, None.. A. Harbison, None.. A. J. Apicelli, None.. J. De Los Santos, None.. W. L. Thorstad, None.. S. V. Puram, None.. P. Oppelt, None.. D. Adkins, None.. M. B. Major, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索