PO.ET05.01 · 实验与分子治疗

在淋巴瘤中利用MYC致癌应激实现治疗获益

Exploiting MYC Oncogenic Stress for Therapeutic Benefit in Lymphoma

海报缩略图:在淋巴瘤中利用MYC致癌应激实现治疗获益
编号 5698 展板 14 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 12 主讲 Smriti Kanangat, BA
分会场 Mechanisms of Anticancer Drug Action
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Smriti Kanangat, James D. Phelan, Louis Staudt

National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是最常见的非霍奇金淋巴瘤类型。基因表达谱分析根据生发中心反应的细胞起源确定了两种类型的DLBCL:生发中心B细胞样(GCB)或活化B细胞样(ABC)DLBCL。尽管GCB患者对标准免疫化疗方案的响应优于ABC,但GCB患者中有一个亚型却矛盾地表现出最低的响应率。这些代表了一个临床和遗传学上截然不同的DLBCL亚群,同时具有MYC和BCL2易位及过表达,被称为'双打击'(DHIT)-GCB。 近期,在复发/难治性DLBCL中开展的ViPOR I/II期临床试验旨在靶向ABC中的生存通路,却意外地证明DHIT-GCB达到了50%的完全缓解(CR)率。体外药物敏感性研究揭示,ViPOR中的BCL2抑制剂venetoclax在DHIT-GCB细胞系中的毒性显著高于其他缺乏MYC易位的BCL2易位GCB细胞系。因此,我们假设抑制BCL2使DHIT-GCB恶性细胞易受MYC诱导的毒性影响,从而解释了DHIT-GCB淋巴瘤对venetoclax的选择性敏感性。 为验证这一点,我们采用降解标签(dTAG)系统在恶性淋巴瘤细胞中可控地降解MYC蛋白。我们使用敲入方法构建了从内源性MYC基因座稳定表达MYC-GFP-dTAG融合蛋白的GCB细胞系。BCL2抑制在这些细胞系中诱导了快速凋亡,但值得注意的是,同时降解MYC增加了存活、非凋亡细胞的比例。 为研究MYC如何调节DHIT-GCB对BCL2抑制的响应,我们在MYC-dTAG细胞系中进行了无偏倚的转录组学和基因组学分析。DHIT-GCB细胞中MYC降解时间进程的RNA-seq验证了MYC基因表达特征下调最为强烈,但有趣的是,显示了B细胞分化和增殖特征的上调。对经venetoclax±MYC降解处理的存活、非凋亡细胞进行分选的全基因组CRISPR筛选表明,对venetoclax差异响应的最强遗传调控因子是DNA复制、损伤和细胞周期基因。这些结果表明,破坏这些通路可与高MYC协同,促进DHIT-GCB细胞对venetoclax的敏感性。 最后,使用扰乱DNA损伤和细胞周期的临床可用靶向疗法进行的功能实验凸显了MYC水平如何与这些过程相关,从而调节对BCL2抑制的响应。 这些研究可能提示利用MYC与BCL2之间协同作用的DHIT-GCB药物联合策略,有望改善这些DLBCL患者的治疗结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequently occurring form of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Gene expression profiling identified two types of DLBCL based on germinal center reaction cell-of-origin: germinal center B cell-like (GCB) or activated B cell-like (ABC) DLBCL. Though GCB patients respond better than ABC to the standard immunochemotherapy regimen, one subtype of GCB patients paradoxically exhibit the lowest response rates. These represent a clinically and genetically distinct subset of DLBCL with both MYC and BCL2 translocations and overexpression, known as ‘double-hit' (DHIT)-GCB. Recently, the ViPOR phase I/II clinical trial in relapsed/refractory DLBCL, designed to target survival pathways in ABC, demonstrated unexpectedly that DHIT-GCB had a 50% complete response (CR) rate. In vitro drug sensitivity studies revealed that venetoclax, a BCL2 inhibitor in ViPOR, is significantly more toxic in DHIT-GCB cell lines than in other BCL2 translocated GCB lines lacking MYC translocations. Thus, we hypothesized that inhibition of BCL2 renders DHIT-GCB malignant cells vulnerable to MYC-induced toxicity, explaining the selective sensitivity of DHIT-GCB lymphomas to venetoclax. To test this, we employed the degradation tag (dTAG) system to controllably degrade MYC protein in malignant lymphoma cells. We used a knock-in approach to engineer GCB cell lines stably expressing a MYC-GFP-dTAG fusion protein from the endogenous MYC locus. BCL2 inhibition induced rapid apoptosis in these lines, but notably, concomitant degradation of MYC increased the proportion of live, non-apoptotic cells. To investigate how MYC modulates response to BCL2 inhibition in DHIT-GCB, we performed unbiased transcriptomic and genomic profiling studies in the MYC-dTAG lines. RNA-seq of MYC degradation in a time-course in DHIT-GCB cells validated that MYC gene expression signatures were the most strongly downregulated but, interestingly, showed upregulation of signatures for B-cell differentiation and proliferation. Genome-wide CRISPR screens sorted on viable, non-apoptotic cells treated with venetoclax +/- MYC degradation demonstrated that the strongest genetic regulators of differential response to venetoclax were DNA replication and damage and cell cycle genes. These results indicated that disruption of these pathways could synergize with high MYC to promote sensitivity of DHIT-GCB cells to venetoclax. Finally, functional assays with clinically available targeted therapies perturbing DNA damage and cell cycle highlighted how MYC levels relate to these processes in malignant B-cells and thus modulate response to BCL2 inhibition. These studies may suggest drug combinations strategies that would harness the synergism between MYC and BCL2 in DHIT-GCB, and hopefully improve therapeutic outcomes for these DLBCL patients.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Kanangat, None.. J. D. Phelan, None.. L. Staudt, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索