PO.ET02.11 · 实验与分子治疗
多体药物偶联物(MDC)BD200 通过一种新型双靶向模式介导抗肿瘤活性
The multibody drug conjugate (MDC) BD200 mediates anti-tumor activity through a novel dual-targeting mode
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
目的:抗体药物偶联物(ADC)的治疗疗效依赖于有效的肿瘤靶向。然而,靶点表达的瘤内及病灶间异质性限制了 ADC 的疗效。此外,ADC 治疗会施加有利于抗原阴性克隆的选择压力,从而增强耐药性。为应对这一挑战,我们推出了多体(Multibody)技术,该技术可通过一种简单的对称性抗体实现对多种肿瘤相关抗原的特异性识别。
方法:多体保持了天然、对称性 IgG 的形式,但可调整其对不同肿瘤表面富集抗原的结合。这种多特异性旨在提高药物疗效、减少耐药并扩大应答患者群体。BD200 是一种多体药物偶联物(MDC),其可变片段(Fv)结构域被设计为可交替地以高特异性结合 TROP2 或 Nectin-4。在其对称性人源 IgG1 形式中,两个此类相同的 Fv 结构域构成了一个“或(OR)”门,使 MDC 能够二价地结合表达靶点 A 的细胞、表达靶点 B 的细胞或同时表达 A 和 B 的细胞。BD200 结合了一种基于拓扑异构酶 1 抑制剂的连接子-载荷。我们在多种肿瘤类型(每种表达一种或两种抗原)上检验了 BD200 的内化及细胞杀伤作用。在一系列采用人源细胞系来源异种移植(CDX)及患者来源异种移植(PDX)模型的体内小鼠研究中,我们将 BD200 的疗效与几种已获批的抗 TROP-2 及抗 Nectin-4 ADC 进行了比较。在这些研究中,我们还在对已获批 ADC 难治的肿瘤中检验了 BD200。最后,我们在非人灵长类动物(NHP)中评估了药代动力学(PK),以与已获批 ADC 的数据进行交叉比较。
结果:BD200 在多种肿瘤细胞中表现出快速内化及强效细胞毒性。虽然每种已获批的单特异性 ADC 在部分肿瘤细胞系上表现良好,但在所有体外检测的细胞系中,BD200 均与已获批 ADC 对照相当或更优。在评估体内抗肿瘤疗效时,BD200 表现出深度且持久的抗肿瘤应答,包括在对已获批 ADC 难治的模型中。BD200 相较于已获批 ADC 表现出相似或更优的血清稳定性及 PK 特性。
结论:临床前数据表明,二价 MDC 可应对肿瘤异质性的挑战,同时保留天然、简单、对称性人源 IgG 的可开发性及功能特性。这可能使 BD200 相较于现有 ADC 在更多肿瘤类型及更多患者中驱动更深度的应答。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Purpose: The therapeutic efficacy of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) relies on effective tumor targeting. However, intra-tumor and inter-lesional heterogeneity of target expression limit ADC efficacy. Moreover, treatment with an ADC exerts selective pressure favoring antigen-negative clones, thus enhancing drug resistance. To address this challenge, we introduce the Multibody technology, which allows for specific recognition of multiple tumor associated antigens through a simple symmetrical antibody.
Methods: Multibodies maintain the format of natural, symmetrical IgGs but can adjust their binding to different tumor surface-enriched antigens. This multi-specificity is designed to improve drug efficacy, reduce resistance and widen the responding patient population. BD200 is a multibody drug conjugate (MDC) whose fragment variable (Fv) domain is designed to bind alternatively to either TROP2 or Nectin-4 with high specificity. In its symmetrical human IgG1 format, two such identical Fv domains create an “OR" gate enabling the MDCs to bind bivalently to cells that express target A, cells that express target B or cells that express both A and B. BD200 incorporates a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-based linker-payload. We tested BD200's internalization and cell-killing on a wide array of tumor types, each expressing one or both antigens. In a series of in-vivo mouse studies using human cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, we compared BD200's efficacy to that of several approved anti-TROP-2 and anti-Nectin-4 ADCs. In these studies, we also tested BD200 in tumors that are refractory to approved ADCs. Finally, we assessed PK in NHPs to cross-compare with data from approved ADCs.
Results: BD200 demonstrated rapid internalization and strong cytotoxic potency across a wide range of tumor cells. While each approved monospecific ADC performed well on some tumor cell lines, BD200 was comparable or superior to approved ADC comparators with all cell lines tested in vitro. Assessing in vivo anti-tumor efficacy, BD200 showed deep and durable anti-tumor responses including in models refractory to approved ADCs. BD200 showed similar or superior serum stability and PK properties compared to approved ADCs.
Conclusion: The preclinical data suggest that a bivalent MDC addresses the challenge of tumor heterogeneity, while retaining the developability and the functional traits of a natural, simple, symmetrical human IgG. This may allow BD200 to drive deeper responses in more tumor types and more patients than existing ADCs.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. D. Oberst,
Astra Zeneca Employment, Stock, Stock Option, Patent.
Biolojic Design Employment, Other Securities.
D. Luger,
Biolojic Design Employment.
M. Kebede,
Biolojic Design Employment.
D. Gunasekera,
Biolojic Design Employment.
M. Gadrich,
Biolojic Design Employment.
Y. Ben David,
Biolojic Design Employment.
L. Asulin,
Biolojic Design Employment.
N. Grossman,
Biolojic Design Employment.
R. Fuchs,
Biolojic Design Employment.
H. Sasson,
Biolojic Design Employment, Other Securities, Patent.
Y. Diesendruck,
Biolojic Design Employment.
G. Nimrod,
Biolojic Design Employment.
T. Wyant,
Biolojic Design Employment, Other Securities.
Aulos Bioscience Employment, Stock, Stock Option.
R. Herbst,
Biolojic Design Employment, Other Securities.
Astra Zeneca Stock.
Y. Ofran,
Biolojic Design Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Other Securities, Other Business Ownership, Patent.
Aulos Biosciences Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option, Patent.
I. Amit,
Biolojic Design Employment, Other Securities.